|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $17.49 1 hr ago
| ![]() $24.96 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $13.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $30.50 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.96 |
![]() |
#1 | |
Active Member
Jan 2007
Denmark
|
![]()
Who takes the time, to write something like this
![]() I took it from eproductwars.com Quote:
Last edited by Helicon; 08-04-2007 at 08:23 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Moderator
|
![]()
Yeah, that seems to be someone stirring up some trouble.
For one thing Sony paying $1 billion for Universal merely to go exclusive would not only be moronically expensive, but it would also be anti-trust. The insiders here are very clear that Universal is still committed to their mistake. If Universal wants to be in the disc business and encourage it properly they will eventually have no choice but to support Blu-ray. Gary |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Active Member
Mar 2007
|
![]()
Why would anyone pay Universal anything to go Blu-ray exclusive? They're bound to go Blu eventually when they figure out their mistake after the "Blu-Christmas", and it won't cost a penny! How's that?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Super Moderator
![]() Nov 2006
|
![]()
This is the stupidest post I have ever read. Ever.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Dec 2006
|
![]()
Look a couple posts before it. It's just someone making fun of an "insider"
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Super Moderator
![]() Nov 2006
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
And, the end of Microsoft as we know it. I guess a billion would also buy a lot of Fox looking the other way as thieves stole their titles on HD DVD. Gary |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
Gary |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Blu-ray Knight
Jan 2006
www.blurayoasis.com
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Moderator
|
![]()
Actually it does.
Universal is faced with a rather hefty cost structure shift if they go neutral. I'll bet they lose the freebies. So, when Ken Graffeo is waffling on about needing more mass market, it really means it represents the point could no longer afford to ignore not having the BD net income (revenue - cost) because he has a sweet deal that eliminates a lot of the up front costs of HD DVD releases. So, it's probably profitable for them, even with the poor numbers. Gary Last edited by dialog_gvf; 08-05-2007 at 04:17 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
"Bourne" Franchise Exclusive to Universal Pictures, Now | Movies | J_UNTITLED | 30 | 11-23-2008 06:49 AM |
Electronic Gaming Monthly: "Universal will no longer be exclusive to HD DVD" | General Chat | kotton247 | 33 | 03-27-2008 09:04 AM |
Post Gazette - "Sound Advice: HD DVD leaves Blu-ray in the dust" | General Chat | Razzy | 36 | 11-10-2007 09:01 PM |
"Warner exclusive" rumor leads to more Blu-ray orders? | General Chat | tron3 | 18 | 09-29-2007 09:22 AM |
What happens with "co-produced by HD DV exclusive studios" films in terms of Blu-ray? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Maxell | 1 | 09-14-2007 06:26 AM |
|
|