|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 3D Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $14.99 | ![]() $18.99 | ![]() $22.40 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $9.55 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $18.15 | ![]() $17.49 | ![]() $11.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $14.99 | ![]() $14.99 |
![]() |
#11 | |
Retired Hollywood Insider
Apr 2007
|
![]() Quote:
![]() As to your observation that “it was a little distracting and gave the impression that the video was playing faster than it should” I believe the discrepancy among reviewers as to some seeing The Hobbit as “sped up” (such as when characters walk fast or run) and other reviewers here on Blu-ray.com seeing normal motion during their respective Hobbit HFR viewings is firstly, due to the theatrical projector systems utilized in the various venues at which they saw their Hobbit HFR exhibitions. People in my immediate family and visiting relatives for the Holidays have now viewed The Hobbit HFR at two different venues. The first was digital ‘IMAX’, e.g. dual projectors with static polarizers. The motion described by all observers was completely natural from the get-go with no evidence of *speed up*. The second local viewing was at a Multiplex which employed a single lens double flash projector (Barco DLP), and from the very beginning observers noticed that the motion appeared sped up…then things settled down, and later on in the movie a few motions appeared to play faster than they should. So, how well each type of projector system deals with The Hobbit seems to be a determining factor in the observation as to whether or not things appear ‘sped up’ or not, to theater patrons. The only question in my mind at this point is whether in this case 48fps proper or post processed 48fps at 270 degree shutter ( see the P.S. here ….https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...on#post6894679 is a contributing factor to some projector systems performing better than others. P.S. For your eyes (and probably interest) only… http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1...ution-for-2013 Last edited by Penton-Man; 01-06-2013 at 04:01 AM. Reason: added a P.S. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
|