|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.99 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $33.49 23 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $27.57 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $30.49 | ![]() $24.96 |
![]() |
#12 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
When I think of some of the outstanding Karloff films under Warner Brother's control I
have to wonder why they chose the least of them. Frankenstein 1970 is pathetic. Sub-par. Less than a Monogram. It doesn't even have the schlock value of an Ed Wood although it's just as bad. I don't enjoy this film. It's a "point-the-camera-and-shoot" instead of a dramatic mise en scène. There's not much story here, and what little there is kindergarten-obvious and stretched out way too long. Karloff created some memorable characters and faces in some good films at WB. Where's 1936 The Walking Dead 1937 West of Shanghai 1938 The Invisible Menace 1939 Devil's Island Why would they put Frankenstein 1970 ahead of better films? |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|