
Did you know that Blu-ray.com also is available for United Kingdom? Simply select the

|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Did you know that Blu-ray.com also is available for United Kingdom? Simply select the ![]() |
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $24.96 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $19.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $20.07 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $27.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $30.48 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.95 |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
This film is pretty much regarded as the weakest in the series (of the original cast anyway) but Paramount almost let Shatner complete the elaborate special effects sequences as he had originally envisioned them before the producers had cut his budget for the Director's Cut DVD release. At the last minute they decided it wasn't worth investing the cost to produce given the projected sales return on the investment compared to the Star Trek: The Motion Picture special edition DVD. Even with some spectacular new effects sequences (ILM was unavailable at the time and a new FX house was hired which produced inferior visual effects) it probably would not make this a better film by any means but somehow some glorious new effects i.e. TOS Remastered might make this a bit more tolerable and it would be interesting to see the scope of Shatner's journey to find God or whatever it was supposed to be at the center of the galaxy. Would you like to see a special edition of Star Trek V with new visual effects produced for the blu-ray release when the Director's Cut double-dippings begin?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Blu-ray Count
Jul 2007
Montreal, Canada
|
![]()
I say let him go for it, what is there to lose
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Blu-ray Duke
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
I think it's kinda folish for them not to allow it. there are enough trekkies in the world that they would surely sell enough copies to re-doup the budget for the effects. If they did the effects in-house that would probably save them even more, but is that the movie that ILM did the effects for? I guess they could see how well the Blu release for the original series is going, a base their choice off of that. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Jan 2008
Chicago, IL
|
![]()
I side with pretty much everyone here. While a full fledged "director's cut" won't make it a good film by any means it might improve it a bit. If anything it would be interesting to see what might have been.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Star Trek: Films 1-10 Remastered Special Edition Box Set [Blu-ray] | United Kingdom and Ireland | bluwombat | 31 | 11-20-2011 04:12 PM |
Which one has better Special Effect (Star Wars: Episode III or Star Trek)? | Movie Polls | mugupo | 34 | 06-04-2010 10:09 PM |
JJ Abrams on Star Trek sequel, Shatner and Khan... | Movies | GreenScar | 70 | 05-20-2009 02:48 PM |
How can Star Trek be saved from HD-DUD and Paramount? | General Chat | Sean4000 | 27 | 12-12-2007 08:44 PM |
Paramount releasing Star Trek on HD DVD | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Lord_Stewie | 57 | 07-31-2007 02:52 PM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|