|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $29.96 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $86.13 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.96 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $36.69 1 day ago
| ![]() $14.44 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $122.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $37.99 | ![]() $80.68 |
|
View Poll Results: Rate Fantastic Four | |||
1 Star |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
94 | 42.53% |
2 Stars |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
59 | 26.70% |
3 Stars |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
53 | 23.98% |
4 Stars |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
13 | 5.88% |
5 Stars |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | 0.90% |
Voters: 221. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1941 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
Can someone clarify if a studio ever actually intentionally sabatoged their own movie with hope for financial failure? Everyone keeps on saying Fox is doing this to screw other Marvel movies. Is that even a realistic scenario? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1942 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
fitprod |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1943 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1944 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
Take this with a grain of salt, but from what I heard, Sony has been talking with Marvel, so I'm sure we'll all hear about something one way or another with what's going on with the Spider-Man franchise. At the very least, we know that Sony and Marvel have a greater line of communication with each other than what Marvel has with Fox. Last edited by Darkstream; 11-14-2014 at 05:18 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1945 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Fox's treatment of Idiocracy was pretty close.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1946 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1947 |
Special Member
|
![]()
I've honestly tried to maintain my sense of humor and moreover I've genuinely tried to remain open-minded throughout the entire updating/revamping (forward minded diversification/unnecessary stunt casting/political correctness debate) and I was successful ...to a degree.
But this news about Victor Von Doom (one of Marvel's three greatest villains of all-time), is just about the straw that broke the camel's back. Although I generally attempt to maintain my composure, I must at this point say that if the rumored changes to Victor (is that even still his name?) are, in point of fact, true than quite simply... F*ck this film... ![]() Or to put it another way ...I've already seen the character of Victor Von Doom destroyed in the prior "Fantastic Four" films ...along with the character of Galactus. Guess I'm a bit tired of these bullish*t movies. Last edited by Red Dragon; 11-14-2014 at 10:45 PM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Col. Zombie (11-15-2014) |
![]() |
#1948 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
There's no way that Marvel would ever think the FF (or F4) license was truly worthless. That's Marvel's First Family! And Dr. Doom is Marvel's greatest supervillain! Just because no one else has ever had good handle on the characters doesn't mean that Marvel wouldn't want them back to show what really could be done with them. If anyone from Marvel ever said something to the effect of "the Fantastic Four license is practically worthless," it would have all been a deal-making tactic just to get them back at an agreeable price, whether X-Men were included or not.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1949 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I have no doubt in my mind that Marvel could spin gold with the Fantastic Four property. The FF are a perfect fit for the MCU.
An ideal FF film would embrace the Lee/Kirby comics, and have the same tone as the first Iron Man film and the first Thor film. Fox could never in a million years make the Fantastic Four film I know Marvel Studios could make. Marvel took Guardians of the Galaxy and made it one of the most successful movies of the year; the most successful domestic success. They turned Rocket and Groot into superstars. They're now iconic. Marvel would make the FF A-list superstars again, and the FF would be more popular than ever before. No doubt in my mind. And to think what Marvel could do if they could utilize Galactus, Silver Surfer... it would be amazing. And we know Marvel wanted them, because they once offered to let Fox keep the Daredevil rights if Fox would trade them just the rights to Galactus and Silver Surfer. I'm not saying Marvel can do no wrong, but they're making the best comic book movies. They get their characters better than anyone. They make the most "comic book-y" comic book movies that appeal to hardcore comic book fans just as much as they appeal to people who have never touched a comic book. Even if Fox pulled a miracle and made a good FF movie, it could never be as good as a Marvel Studios FF movie. Not to sound like a Marvel fanboy, but the simple truth is they have the best record. Imagine a Lee/Kirby inspired FF movie, with the classic FF, helmed by Brad Bird? How great would that be? Instead we're stuck with Josh Trank, a bunch of actors who look more at home on the CW, and a "Doom" who gets his name from internet bloggers. ![]() Marvel has my faith and my trust. Fox does not. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1950 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Both the F4 and Spider-Man are tainted now. Marvel doesn't need them. Let Fox and Sony keep them and continue to do whatever the hell they are doing. Marvel is strong enough now where those other characters can stay away and won't be missed. At all.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1951 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
You're in the minority with that thought. Marvel may not need Spider-Man and the Fantastic Four to succeed as a studio, but those properties are near and dear to both Marvel as a company and all their fans, therefore they would be greatly welcomed additions to the Marvel Cinematic Universe at any point in the future. Any sort tainting that those properties suffer at the hands of other studios would wipe clean off in a second the moment the first internet headline reads of Marvel reaquiring Spider-Man and/or The Fantastic Four.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | DJMcNiff (11-15-2014), Moviefan2k4 (11-15-2014) |
![]() |
#1952 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Various tax loopholes over the years have allowed a production's financial backers to receive much higher payouts from box office failure. Recently there was a German one that essentially justified most of Uwe Boll's career until it was finally closed.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1953 |
Special Member
Jun 2012
Assgard
|
![]()
I wonder if this sort of adaptation was sought out for its lower production costs. Fewer powered beings, fewer cgi shots, and keep the F4 away from Marvel for another x years.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1954 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
Marvel will always value the comic book characters, but, as of right now, in terms of cinematic value, the property is practically worthless. Three movies in and only two that have seen the light of day. The movie franchise has never been one that was highly valued by movie fans. the previous F4 movies were regarded as failures some quarters, despite decent box office. Personally I enjoyed them. And now we have what appears to be fourth F4 movie in the making that appears to be nuclear in how big of a bomb it will be. IF, and this is a BIG IF, Marvel does go after the F4 rights they will surely attempt to get X-Men as well. And that would give Fox some leverage in negotiations. The most likely scenario is that Marvel is just going to let Fox grow tired of the franchise and let the rights revert back. That way Marvel doesn't have to spend a dime. The only way Fox wins, is if Marvel gets itchy and decides they want F4 back RIGHT NOW. But Marvel is quite happy to play with their own toys for the time being. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Darkstream (11-15-2014) |
![]() |
#1955 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Thomas Guycott (11-15-2014) |
![]() |
#1956 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1957 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
Galactus Silver Surfer Namor Annihilus Skrulls (& Super Skrull by extension) - That one stung when they had to use the Chitori instead Kang (not sure if he his in the Avengers roster or the FF one) And of course Doom. It could be said that the roster has 2 out of 4 of Marvel's greatest Villains of all time (Galactus & Doom, the other two being Magneto and Thanos). I know Spidey is iconic for Marvel, but I'd rather a million times that they'd get FF back honestly. At least I think they can work with Sony to some extent. Looks like bridges are being burned every day between Marvel and Fox these days... I'd like a world where you have a 3 year rotation between Avengers, FF and GotG (or another team like Inhumans or West Coast Avengers per example). |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | djakrse (11-15-2014) |
![]() |
#1958 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Red Dragon (11-15-2014) |
![]() |
#1959 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
Wasnt Chronicle mysterious until release as well?
We have seen nothing except for these horrible-sounding info nuggets from actor interviews. They could still be kidding. There is a pattern. Usually in pre-movie interviews, it's all positive or "im sorry I cant talk about that." In FF4 interviews, the cast/crew consistently throw in some form of negativity and horrible story-changing info. Trank is in his 20s - he must have instructed everyone to trick all media. It's something his generation would do. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1960 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Is This the Plot of The Fantastic Four?
I guess this is floating around the internet. Of course, no way to verify if it's real, and it can easily be a fake that someone wrote up. I don't know how old it is. It (supposedly) is the whole movie, so I should mention "potential spoilers." Fake or real, it's worth reading for the laughs: Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
fantastic 4 |
|
|