|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.97 1 hr ago
| ![]() $35.99 20 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.99 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $22.96 |
|
View Poll Results: Are you gonna hold off bluray disk purchases now, to wait for ultraHD bluray? | |||
YES |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
63 | 9.69% |
NO |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
587 | 90.31% |
Voters: 650. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#442 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
But there is no reason that 3D can't be added to the spec later just like it was for current Blu-Ray. Blu-Ray 3D didn't come till 4 years into Blu-Rays lifetime and we might have a similar wait Also most modern 3D movies have 2k DIs. So even if it had a 3D spec there are only a handful of 3D movies that could take full advantage of it |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#443 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#444 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Can the new UHD players play 3D blurays, meaning it will upscale the 3D bluray?
Also is there a link of all the movies titles old and new? I came across a link by CNET with some of the titles that will be available to stream or are on the Sony and Samsung media players but not a full list. |
![]() |
![]() |
#445 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
Films with 4K DIs: https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=218262 Digital Films with 4K DIs: https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=220755 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#446 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#447 |
Blu-ray King
|
![]()
No, these are films that were actually filmed in 35mm (4K) or higher that have been a given a 4K or higher digital intermediate. There will no upscaling required as they will have already been scanned at 4K.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#448 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
There are still some films that were only ever released on blu-ray back in 06/07 as barebones releases with MPEG-2 transfers and never received any kind of re-encode or remaster over the past 8 years.
I think it's safe to say that these films probably won't be released in 4K if studios don't feel the need to give them a decent blu-ray release, so I suppose if you need them in HD they'd still be worth picking up on BD. |
![]() |
![]() |
#449 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#450 |
Blu-ray King
|
![]()
I absolutely disagree here. I have done some direct comparisons of the exact same recordings on both vinyl and CD. My conclusion is that the CD sounds too clean in layman's terms and I am not just talking about scratches and pops.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Se.Vero (08-30-2015) |
![]() |
#451 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
They would likely look better on an old CRT screen. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#452 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by kidglov3s; 08-29-2015 at 05:31 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#453 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
Tons of CDs have sounded like crap over the years thanks to "digital remastering", which really means "crank up the volume and obliterate any dynamic range the audio had" (The Loudness Wars). Vinyl has manged to avoid being a player in that field for the most part. And some people do like the warm analog sound of vinyl, like I said. But there are many drawbacks to vinyl, and the debate will likely never end on which is better. Again, according to math, CD wins. I myself love vinyl but agree it has many, many drawbacks. For one, every time you play it, it gets worse. That's a fact, and a major downside. The fact that the sound is better on the outside edge of the record as opposed to the inside is another issue. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#454 |
Blu-ray Ninja
Oct 2008
|
![]()
I don't know why this misconception persists - most vinyl records of new music are pressed from the same overcompressed masters as the CDs. And there are plenty of CDs that have dynamic mixes. It's like saying teal color timing is a problem with the blu-ray format (and I'm not suggesting you said anything like that, mind you). No, both are problems with mastering trends.
Last edited by 42041; 08-29-2015 at 06:28 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#455 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
Milking you like a tit Not you btw just gen pop |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#457 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Vinyl can in theory sound better.. But as someone already mentioned, the sound on these modern revival vinyls isn't analogue, but the same digital masters which are used for CDs that are put on vinyl.
Pretty much the equivalent of a digital video shot with the 2.8K digital camera transferred to 35mm film. |
![]() |
![]() |
#458 | |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]() Quote:
I will say, however, that vinyl is a more "tangible" physical medium. There's something about holding a vinyl record, looking at the cover, and flipping it over in my hands that somehow lends more to the concept of experiencing music instead of merely listening to it. As far as sound, convenience, and durability go, though, I'm all about the CDs. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#459 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#460 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
I couldn't see Star Trek and World War Z on those lists. I have noticed they have been given the 4K treatment whether they are taken from actual 4K transfers (or higher) or upscaled I don't know. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|