|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $39.02 1 hr ago
| ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $23.79 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $35.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $33.49 |
![]() |
#63 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Is Universal really going to take a 10-year-old HD transfer and slap HDR on it?
When the UE came out on BD, people were disappointed the video was untouched. The UE now costs $10 on BD, so this 4K marketing process will be fascinating. I'm also not fully convinced WB will remaster the early HP movies for UHD either. |
![]() |
![]() |
#65 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
Also this is Universal we're talking about, so no matter the state of the master it's going to be re-used. No question about that really. I think the Kong BD still looks amazing and should look amazing on UHD though. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#67 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Except for the wide colour gamut, increased bitrate for every last detail possible, HDR for more depth and dimensionality to the image, and so on and so forth.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Oh, I meant it was pointless to have a 4K DI or attempt to go back and do a proper 4K master, as a majority of the VFX was ~2K, and that was a majority of the movie. Of course I'd love a UHD HDR release of this one!
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Geoff D (05-01-2017), legends of beyond (05-01-2017) |
![]() |
#69 |
Special Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
Banned
|
![]()
They may not know how to do seamless branching with lossless audio... unlike every other major studio. That seems to be Universal's MO on most discs like that.
So, the audio may not work correctly yet again. |
![]() |
![]() |
#73 | ||
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Seeing as the corrective firmware update from D&M doesn't seem to be any closer to fruition then yeah, this may end up being another DTS-HD HR 7.1 jobbie if the DTS:X is indeed lossy. At least the disc is a triple-stacker according to the cover, and thank **** for that given the lengthy running time of the film. I make that to be Universal's first 100GB disc. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
Special Member
|
![]()
If the typical modding mods are in typical modding mode, you typically won't get an answer. Some of my posts were also deleted for some reason.
Last edited by legends of beyond; 05-03-2017 at 09:02 PM. Reason: Added some things. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | rickah88 (05-03-2017) |
![]() |
#77 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#79 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
Now look where we are. [emoji1] At least the Blu-ray only cost me $10. Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#80 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
If any movie gets a new 4k scan and comes out on bd it's good practice to wait several months to see if a 4k version will be released. Since we most likely have the existing blu it's easy to do. I'm not buying the new 4k scan of Wrath of Khan because at some point it will have a uhd release.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | HiDefBer (05-06-2017), reanimator (05-04-2017) |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|