Square Enix: 360 Easier To Program For Than PS3 - Blu-ray Forum

DezNutz · 12-16-2008, 02:38 PM

I don't see why this is bad.. hell it is probably easier to develop for the Gameboy than the 360.. but what does that mean? Does that mean gameboy is the best system? No just the easiest to develop for..

More times than not, easier to develop for = older system capable of less therefore less work to develop..

dk3dknight · 12-16-2008, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DezNutz

I don't see why this is bad.. hell it is probably easier to develop for the Gameboy than the 360.. but what does that mean? Does that mean gameboy is the best system? No just the easiest to develop for..

More times than not, easier to develop for = older system capable of less therefore less work to develop..

I think that is human nature...

At work if your boss gave you a choice would you choose the small stack or the larger stack that requires months of extra work attached to it...

becomingwater · 12-16-2008, 02:46 PM

All I will say to this is talk to Naughty Dog and you will find out the PS3 is not hard to develop on. To me this is saying they are lazy developers over at Square Enix.

I still think Naughty Dog is the best Game Developer out there.

Uniquely · 12-16-2008, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DezNutz

More times than not, easier to develop for = older system capable of less therefore less work to develop..

Or then... it could just mean a system with better developers support. I've read many developers say that the support they get from MS is second to none.

Simplayer · 12-16-2008, 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robinandtami

Or then... it could just mean a system with better developers support. I've read many developers say that the support they get from MS is second to none.

More than likely.

Avarice · 12-17-2008, 01:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by robinandtami

Or then... it could just mean a system with better developers support. I've read many developers say that the support they get from MS is second to none.

GG, naughty dog, and Konami would disagree with you on second to none as far as support goes. Plus the word "lazy" is what applies to developers this late in the game using the same ole' excuse after most every other developer has seem to have gotten the hang of the cell. Even EA has started getting games up and running same day and date.....and they usually suck in my book

prerich · 12-17-2008, 05:10 PM

Closing this thread - no XBox 360 discussions.

Similar Threads
thread	Forum	Thread Starter	Replies	Last Post
Square Enix Plans to Take Over Tecmo	PS3	MajorZero	15	08-30-2008 01:35 AM
Square-Enix...really guys?	General Chat	gnash	11	08-21-2008 05:14 AM
Square Enix promises FFXIII for 08.	PS3	stockstar1138	24	01-29-2008 06:42 PM
Square Enix CEO: 360 & PS3 too complex	PS3	Blu Tiger	19	06-14-2007 12:49 PM
Square Enix going multi-platform?	PS3	funkybudda	9	01-25-2007 11:26 PM

12-16-2008, 02:38 PM	#1
DezNutz Expert Member Member since:Mar 2007 Home Theater Gallery:8 Blu-ray collection:24	I don't see why this is bad.. hell it is probably easier to develop for the Gameboy than the 360.. but what does that mean? Does that mean gameboy is the best system? No just the easiest to develop for.. More times than not, easier to develop for = older system capable of less therefore less work to develop..

12-16-2008, 02:46 PM	#3
becomingwater Power Member Member since:Mar 2007 Location:New Mexico Home Theater Gallery:1 4K collection:15 Blu-ray collection:526 Blu-ray reviews:13 Trading Score:3	All I will say to this is talk to Naughty Dog and you will find out the PS3 is not hard to develop on. To me this is saying they are lazy developers over at Square Enix. I still think Naughty Dog is the best Game Developer out there.

12-17-2008, 05:10 PM	#7
prerich Moderator Top ranked HT gallery Top contributor Member since:Dec 2007 Home Theater Gallery:50 Blu-ray reviews:1 Trading Score:2	Closing this thread - no XBox 360 discussions.

Best PS3 Game Deals