|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $32.99 | ![]() $15.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $37.49 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.13 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $27.95 | ![]() $45.00 | ![]() $12.52 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $82.99 | ![]() $29.99 |
![]() |
#1682 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | HD Goofnut (12-26-2017) |
![]() |
#1683 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Epic landscape aspect perhaps, versus "character driven" aspect.
Although PATTON was filmed in epic landscape, the character driven scenes worked equally well. I was disappointed in the smaller aspect of PASSAGE TO INDIA, with some great landscape scenes. But the over all story if character driven. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1688 |
Active Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1689 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1690 |
Power Member
|
![]()
Thanks for this list!
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | HD Goofnut (01-13-2018) |
![]() |
#1693 |
Banned
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1694 |
Active Member
|
![]()
Sorry for my ignorance - is the first post being updated? I see a lot of people throwing out random movies throughout this and I'm not sure if they are asking if they are real 4K, wanting them to be real 4K, stating they are real 4K or just saying they happen to like these movies.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1695 |
Special Member
|
![]()
A practical-effects driven, 1 1/2 hour, directed by a man whose notorious for using as little CGI as possible movie that was finished on film is comparable to Marvel movies with CGI in almost every frame, nearly 3 hours, and likely impossible to finish on film?
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1696 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | boe (01-14-2018) |
![]() |
#1697 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
I guess the best thing we could all hope for would be for post-production and VFX work to become easier, faster and cheaper to do in 4K, thus enabling even the most VFX-heavy movies to deliver DIs at 4K. I would assume that a lot of it comes down to rendering times, as well as just VFX artists needing more time to do more detailed or intricate work for 4K to become the norm. Most big-budget movies now don't seem to shoot at anything lower than 4K, so the camera tech is certainly up to the task.
Time is of course money, and studios generally have an urge to get the movie done as quickly as possible, which will inevitably lead to some kind of sacrifices being made at some point. In this case it's having a DI at 2K when it could easily have been 4K. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1698 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I know the capture, ingest, storage, compute, client and networking infrastructure is significant for a true 4K editing workflow.
That said, these shops have deep pockets. But alas, we’re talking about the bottom line here - it always wins. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1699 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1700 |
Special Member
|
![]()
If they spent recklessly on 4K CGI, which would also require God knows how much more computing hours to finish and greatly extending post production deadlines as well as increase costs for something most of their audience doesn't care about, than they wouldn't be getting 14 billion dollars.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | FilmFreakosaurus (01-14-2018), MarekM (01-14-2018) |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|