|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $12.49 58 min ago
| ![]() $32.99 | ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $37.49 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 | ![]() $45.00 | ![]() $34.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $15.99 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 | ![]() $27.13 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $82.99 | ![]() $16.99 |
![]() |
#2004 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Finished on a 2K DI. Most likely newly transferred from the camera original for the 4K master, Sony insist that all of their movies shot on film but finished on a DI get taken through a traditional neg cut, meaning that creating a new (and genuine) 4K transfer is a lot simpler. I've not heard how they treat VFX in these instances, whether they just cut a filmout into the negative or whether they upscale the 2K digital originals, although the latter could be tricky if spread across lots of different vendors.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | s_har (06-30-2018) |
![]() |
#2006 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
You are my favorite poster here! |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Geoff D (07-01-2018) |
![]() |
#2018 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Visitor2014; 11-20-2018 at 12:18 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2019 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
So a few weeks after I tuned my Oled . . . I found a Blu-Ray I bought in a few years ago that was stilled sealed (stored in my stash section to watch later) . . . and it was the 1982 film BLADE RUNNER which was reissued in 2011. After inserting it in my 4k Upscale Player and into the first 15 minutes . . . the WOW factor hit me! What the heck is going on??? A blu-ray that looks as crisp as a regular 4k movie?? Turns out the biggest factor was how the studio used the best master available . . . and then produced a high-K transfer to be used in a standard Blu-Ray Format. Now that the official Blade Runner 4K is out, most of the reviews are saying there is not that much difference. So my Blu-Ray library is not going to get tossed for a while . . . as I begin to rediscover which titles look as good as 4K . . . which may not be as good as Native . . . but close enough. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2020 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
The AC article mentions that the filmmakers were still angling for a DI finish during post but the studio was prevaricating (the suits also insisted on screening film dailies rather than digital ones) and that no decision had been made, have never found anything since to indicate it got a DI.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|