|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $22.49 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $68.47 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.49 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $22.49 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $54.45 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $34.96 |
![]() |
#11 | |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]() Quote:
He's talking purely about resolution and not range but that's very revealing in itself, for if he was in any way concerned about HDR tone mapping then playing it on a projektor would be at the top of the list. He then goes on to justify not releasing stuff in 4K because those using projektors are in the tiniest minority of Criterion buyers, which runs totally contrary to them holding back on it just in case PJ types would be badly disadvantaged by the HDR snafu. He's saying they're holding back 4K because there aren't ENOUGH projektor owners out there to take advantage of what he perceives to be the main benefits. Again: I think people are giving them far too much credit here. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
|
|
![]() |
|
|