ps3 quality - Blu-ray Forum

detective392 · 05-17-2009, 03:04 PM

I was reading on another forum that the ps3 dosent have better 1080p quality as some stand alone players and ps3 quality is less is this true becuase I use my ps3 for my blu-ray player?

tntkain · 05-17-2009, 03:07 PM

no thats not true, people just like to bash the ps3.

Sonny · 05-17-2009, 03:17 PM

The PS3 is just as good as 99.99999999% of other players in the PQ department.

Grevlin · 05-17-2009, 03:27 PM

How about audio quality - any weaknesses there??

Uncle Leo · 05-17-2009, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grevlin

How about audio quality - any weaknesses there??

NO. Decodes everything inside it so u do not need an amp that does, but no analog out

MOONPHASE · 05-17-2009, 03:56 PM

There is so much false information about the PS3 floating around in other forums that it's quite scary. Rest assured you didn't waste any money for buying a PS3 and ignore all of the hatred people have against the PS3.

neos_peace · 05-17-2009, 08:00 PM

as with what was said earlier. I use my PS3 as my Blu-ray player. It's awesome. I won't ever go with a standalone ever.

gonk · 05-17-2009, 08:33 PM

The PS3 was the only good choice for a Blu-ray player for the first year or two of the format's life, and it remains a good choice even today. For BD picture quality, I know of no reason to find fault with it. Some players will do a better job with standard DVD's, but there are also quite a few that won't do as good a job in that regard.

The only significant reasons I see to consider a standalone player instead of the PS3 are ambient noise (some PS3's generate a distracting amount of cooling fan noise), difficult integration with a universal remote, and a lack multichannel analog output.

md99 · 05-18-2009, 04:57 PM

I came SO close to buying a standalone this weekend. I went to a nearby electrical store and had a good look at the Panasonic BD's 35, 55 & 60 Blu Ray players. They weren't expensive, I could have bought any of them without leaving too much of a hole in my wallet but after watching the movie being played on all three (Wall-E, which I have) I honestly couldn't see any notable improvements over the Playstation (or each of the Panasonic units against eachother to be honest!). Until something comes along which really BLOWS the PS3 away I'm sticking with it.

If only it wasn't so damn ugly though

Steve · 05-18-2009, 05:10 PM

I'm using a PS3 as my only BD player and I'm very happy with it. PQ and AQ are both top-notch IMO. I remember reading about some player that came out that supposedly offer better PQ, but the improvement is minimal and the player is more than twice the price of a PS3.

Another_Dude · 05-18-2009, 05:14 PM

My PS3 outputs video in 1081p.

Its that good.

Steve · 05-18-2009, 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Another_Dude

My PS3 outputs video in 1081p.

Its that good.

That's awesome!

Hammie · 05-18-2009, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Another_Dude

My PS3 outputs video in 1081p.

Its that good.

Well, mine outputs both audio and video at 11.

Another_Dude · 05-18-2009, 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by louhamilton

Well, mine outputs both audio and video at 11.

Well its one louder now it'nt it?

Xombito · 05-18-2009, 05:58 PM

Ditto on pretty much everybody here. Quality as good as standalone. No multichannel analog out and though not really a problem anymore thanks to the Logitech adapter but remote function only support bluetooth.

lokir1 · 05-18-2009, 11:48 PM

PS3' ROCK! I Have 2 Ps 3's Yes Im A Gamer But Im A Movie Lover As Well Wouldnt Think Of Any Reason To Get A Stand Alone Against My Ps3's The Only Thing That Does Interest Me Is The Players From Denon Or Marantz And The Likes Which Include A Reon Chip Supposedly Making Even Blu Ray P/q Look Even Better But I Have No Experience 1st Hand And Dont Know If Its Justifiable To Spend 2k Or More On A Player For Just A Slight Improvement

Petra_Kalbrain · 05-19-2009, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lokir1

PS3' ROCK! I Have 2 Ps 3's Yes Im A Gamer But Im A Movie Lover As Well Wouldnt Think Of Any Reason To Get A Stand Alone Against My Ps3's The Only Thing That Does Interest Me Is The Players From Denon Or Marantz And The Likes Which Include A Reon Chip Supposedly Making Even Blu Ray P/q Look Even Better But I Have No Experience 1st Hand And Dont Know If Its Justifiable To Spend 2k Or More On A Player For Just A Slight Improvement

DUDE! Have you EVER taken a typing class?!?!? What the hell is with the capitals? It's very annoying.

scweb13 · 05-19-2009, 02:55 AM

Of course, I'll chime in and say that I like my stand-alone better than my PS3 mainly due to the fact that the stand-alone bitstreams and operates with my Harmony One.

I would recommend the Panny BD-60 to anyone before I'd recommend the PS3 (unless they are a gamer).
There's a lovefest for the PS3 that is still alive today and it stems back to the days that it was the only BD player that was worth getting.

RiseDarthVader · 05-19-2009, 09:40 AM

Why do you want a player to bitstream and pay extra to have a receiver that decodes all the codecs compared to a decoder and player in 1 for half the price? Maybe your just one of the people that like to be able to see the codecs on your receiver instead of just PCM so whatever.

Johnny Vinyl · 05-19-2009, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RiseDarthVader

Why do you want a player to bitstream and pay extra to have a receiver that decodes all the codecs compared to a decoder and player in 1 for half the price? Maybe your just one of the people that like to be able to see the codecs on your receiver instead of just PCM so whatever.

When I inserted IN THE NAME OF THE KING I would have liked my receiver to say: "Mayday! Mayday! EJECT Immediately!"

John

05-17-2009, 03:04 PM	#1
detective392 Blu-ray Baron Top contributor Member since:Jul 2008 Location:Champlin, MN Home Theater Gallery:3 Blu-ray collection:439 DVD collection:293 Blu-ray reviews:21	ps3 quality I was reading on another forum that the ps3 dosent have better 1080p quality as some stand alone players and ps3 quality is less is this true becuase I use my ps3 for my blu-ray player?

05-18-2009, 11:48 PM	#16
lokir1 Active Member Member since:Oct 2007 Home Theater Gallery:23 4K collection:122 Blu-ray collection:817 iTunes collection:1 Prime collection:1 Blu-ray reviews:14	Top Dog PS3' ROCK! I Have 2 Ps 3's Yes Im A Gamer But Im A Movie Lover As Well Wouldnt Think Of Any Reason To Get A Stand Alone Against My Ps3's The Only Thing That Does Interest Me Is The Players From Denon Or Marantz And The Likes Which Include A Reon Chip Supposedly Making Even Blu Ray P/q Look Even Better But I Have No Experience 1st Hand And Dont Know If Its Justifiable To Spend 2k Or More On A Player For Just A Slight Improvement

Similar Threads
thread	Forum	Thread Starter	Replies	Last Post
PS3 CD Quality? Anything & Everything	Blu-ray Music and High Quality Music	JJ_85	3	08-28-2009 09:26 PM
The studio quality PCM and DTS-HD Master sound tracks are too good of quality	Home Theater General Discussion	HDTV1080P	12	06-04-2009 05:37 PM
Need help with picture quality for ps3	PS3	detective392	6	01-19-2009 05:05 AM
Ps3 vs s550 (Quality)	Blu-ray Players and Recorders	versacestl	16	01-18-2009 03:33 AM
PS3 Image Quality	Newbie Discussion	joshfuld	39	01-31-2008 02:43 PM

05-17-2009, 03:07 PM	#2
tntkain Senior Member Member since:Jul 2007 Blu-ray collection:103 Blu-ray reviews: 2	no thats not true, people just like to bash the ps3.

05-17-2009, 03:17 PM	#3
Sonny Blu-ray Ninja Member since:Aug 2007 Home Theater Gallery:8 Blu-ray reviews:6 Trading Score:1	The PS3 is just as good as 99.99999999% of other players in the PQ department.

05-17-2009, 03:27 PM	#4
Grevlin Blu-ray Samurai Member since:Jan 2009 Home Theater Gallery:38 Blu-ray collection:82	How about audio quality - any weaknesses there??

05-17-2009, 03:56 PM	#6
MOONPHASE Blu-ray Duke Top contributor Member since:Jun 2007 Location:California 4K collection:8 Blu-ray collection:520 DVD collection:820 Blu-ray reviews:18 Trading Score:29	There is so much false information about the PS3 floating around in other forums that it's quite scary. Rest assured you didn't waste any money for buying a PS3 and ignore all of the hatred people have against the PS3.

05-17-2009, 08:00 PM	#7
neos_peace Special Member Member since:Jul 2008 Location:Shamokin Dam, Pa Home Theater Gallery:14 Blu-ray collection:279 Trading Score:1	as with what was said earlier. I use my PS3 as my Blu-ray player. It's awesome. I won't ever go with a standalone ever.

05-17-2009, 08:33 PM	#8
gonk Senior Member Member since:Mar 2009 Location:Memphis, TN Blu-ray collection:111	The PS3 was the only good choice for a Blu-ray player for the first year or two of the format's life, and it remains a good choice even today. For BD picture quality, I know of no reason to find fault with it. Some players will do a better job with standard DVD's, but there are also quite a few that won't do as good a job in that regard. The only significant reasons I see to consider a standalone player instead of the PS3 are ambient noise (some PS3's generate a distracting amount of cooling fan noise), difficult integration with a universal remote, and a lack multichannel analog output.

05-18-2009, 04:57 PM	#9
md99 Expert Member Top ranked HT gallery Member since:Sep 2008 Location:Oirland Home Theater Gallery:167 Blu-ray collection:406	I came SO close to buying a standalone this weekend. I went to a nearby electrical store and had a good look at the Panasonic BD's 35, 55 & 60 Blu Ray players. They weren't expensive, I could have bought any of them without leaving too much of a hole in my wallet but after watching the movie being played on all three (Wall-E, which I have) I honestly couldn't see any notable improvements over the Playstation (or each of the Panasonic units against eachother to be honest!). Until something comes along which really BLOWS the PS3 away I'm sticking with it. If only it wasn't so damn ugly though

05-18-2009, 05:10 PM	#10
Steve Blu-ray Knight Top ranked HT gallery Top contributor Member since:May 2008 Location:Anna, TX 4K collection:128 Blu-ray collection:416 Trading Score:41	I'm using a PS3 as my only BD player and I'm very happy with it. PQ and AQ are both top-notch IMO. I remember reading about some player that came out that supposedly offer better PQ, but the improvement is minimal and the player is more than twice the price of a PS3.

05-18-2009, 05:14 PM	#11
Another_Dude Blu-ray Guru Member since:Dec 2008 Blu-ray collection:191 Blu-ray reviews:8	My PS3 outputs video in 1081p. Its that good.

05-18-2009, 05:58 PM	#15
Xombito Active Member Member since:May 2009 Location:Somewherein CA. Blu-ray collection:97 Blu-ray reviews:1	Ditto on pretty much everybody here. Quality as good as standalone. No multichannel analog out and though not really a problem anymore thanks to the Logitech adapter but remote function only support bluetooth.

05-19-2009, 02:55 AM	#18
scweb13 Blu-ray Guru Member since:Nov 2007 Location:Everett, WA 4K collection:1 Blu-ray collection:512 DVD collection:29 Trading Score:4	Of course, I'll chime in and say that I like my stand-alone better than my PS3 mainly due to the fact that the stand-alone bitstreams and operates with my Harmony One. I would recommend the Panny BD-60 to anyone before I'd recommend the PS3 (unless they are a gamer). There's a lovefest for the PS3 that is still alive today and it stems back to the days that it was the only BD player that was worth getting.

05-19-2009, 09:40 AM	#19
RiseDarthVader Power Member Member since:Sep 2008 Location:Australia Blu-ray collection:136	Why do you want a player to bitstream and pay extra to have a receiver that decodes all the codecs compared to a decoder and player in 1 for half the price? Maybe your just one of the people that like to be able to see the codecs on your receiver instead of just PCM so whatever.

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals