|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $27.57 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.13 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $30.50 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.99 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.95 |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Big TVs are so cheap now, who cares if there's "black bars" on the bottom and top, or on the sides?
If you were trying to watch Ben-Hur on an old 19-inch CRT, then yeah, that's more of a problem. But TVs have gotten a lot better since then! TVs are so good and so cheap now, it's amazing to me that anyone would complain about them. (Also, I've never understood why people use the phrase "black bars". It's just negative space where there's no image. They're not bars. They're nothing.) |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
Everyone with a 1.78 TV is equally affected. It wouldn't matter if I replaced my 65 inch TV with an 85 inch TV. It would have the reverse effect of making 1.3 movies and shows too big. You can scoot your seat closer for 2.4 movies, but the flatness of the screen will bulge out in the center more and the sound won't be right. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
The filmmakers intended it to take up most of your field of view, which doesn't work when your display width is so narrow that it shrinks the picture. Your experience with Ben-Hur was compromised by the 1.78 prioritization for fullscreen content.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
Standard TV dimensions are a good compromise for accommodating a variety of aspect ratios (and for actually fitting in people's living rooms). |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|