|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $34.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $29.95 1 day ago
| ![]() $30.52 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.96 | ![]() $26.95 | ![]() $11.49 | ![]() $34.99 |
![]() |
#121 |
Blu-ray Emperor
|
![]()
Dude, they just added some sharpness to it. That's it. And yet it still won't resolve anything like the apparent detail/sharpness of the previous Blu-ray. They didn't go back to the DI as was prognosticated, they didn't even change the HDR grade because it's what the directors signed off on the first time. It's the same filmout transfer underneath, pixel for pixel. I'm happy that you're happy but for all that gnashing of teeth, for all the involvement of Fidelity's reassuringly expensive service and checking again with the filmmakers, they've just plopped an unsharp mask on it or better yet, have literally done nothing to the source and simply given the 4K transfer a new encode which bypassed the filtering of the Lionsgate, which any authoring house could've done. It's not Mackenzie Magic™️.
Last edited by Geoff D; Today at 01:22 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|