As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
3 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
1 day ago
The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
The Breakfast Club 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.52
 
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Superman 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
Pale Rider 4K (Blu-ray)
$28.24
5 hrs ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2010, 03:34 AM   #1
HD Goofnut HD Goofnut is online now
Blu-ray King
 
HD Goofnut's Avatar
 
May 2010
Far, Far Away
114
743
2373
128
751
1091
598
133
39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by un4gvn94538 View Post
some people have only 2ch systems mostly for music playback but still want lossless audio from movies
Which doesn't make much sense to me.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 03:39 AM   #2
bsmith6470 bsmith6470 is offline
Active Member
 
bsmith6470's Avatar
 
Nov 2009
Richfield, MN
11
215
18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HD Goofnut View Post
Which doesn't make much sense to me.
I'm with you. To me it defeats the purpose and would cause the exact symptom the OP is describing. Certain parts of the audio are assigned to certain channels for a reason. By eliminating 5.1 of those channels would leave some holes, wouldn't you think?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 03:40 AM   #3
un4gvn94538 un4gvn94538 is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
un4gvn94538's Avatar
 
Dec 2007
Limbo (Bakersfield, Ca.)
141
809
54
1492
277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HD Goofnut View Post
Which doesn't make much sense to me.
why? why wouldnt someone want the best possible sound out of thier equipment? or are you expecting them to go out and purchase more speakers? once upon a time, movies were only in stereo.

edit: would it be better to select the lossy track? some people just prefer a 2 channel set up for what ever reason. you dont have to understand.

Last edited by un4gvn94538; 06-24-2010 at 03:46 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 03:52 AM   #4
Jeff Kleist Jeff Kleist is offline
The Digital Bits
 
Jul 2008
1
Default

You need to set your system to stereo if you're using stereo speakers. You're missing the center channel and that's why you can't hear anything
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 01:27 PM   #5
dougotte dougotte is offline
Expert Member
 
Jul 2009
181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Kleist View Post
You need to set your system to stereo if you're using stereo speakers. You're missing the center channel and that's why you can't hear anything
Thanks, Jeff. A lot of posters here are writing incomplete or erroneous info. By setting your player to output stereo, it should downmix the lossless 5.1 track. Info from all the channels will be retained, but mixed down to 2 channels.

Doug
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 02:23 PM   #6
JediFonger JediFonger is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
JediFonger's Avatar
 
Nov 2009
248
1350
144
1
47
Default

or just choose the 2.0 track
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 03:03 PM   #7
neo_reloaded neo_reloaded is offline
Banned
 
Jan 2008
416
72
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JediFonger View Post
or just choose the 2.0 track
The two tracks differ in content, not just channels - the lossy track is the original broadcast mono, and the 7.1 lossless track is the remastered, remixed audio. When choosing between the two tracks, viewers should choose based on the content, not the channels. If your equipment is set up properly, whatever track you choose will be correctly mixed for the number of speakers you actually have and you will not miss any audio - as occurs for ALL Blu-rays. In fact, most BDs ONLY have 5.1 or 7.1 audio, so this would be a big problem if equipment was not designed to deal with this exact scenario.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 03:20 PM   #8
JediFonger JediFonger is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
JediFonger's Avatar
 
Nov 2009
248
1350
144
1
47
Default

i know... but if you have 2.0 u might as well just listen to the original mono mix. no point in 7.1->2.0 downmix.

Quote:
Originally Posted by neo_reloaded View Post
The two tracks differ in content, not just channels - the lossy track is the original broadcast mono, and the 7.1 lossless track is the remastered, remixed audio. When choosing between the two tracks, viewers should choose based on the content, not the channels. If your equipment is set up properly, whatever track you choose will be correctly mixed for the number of speakers you actually have and you will not miss any audio - as occurs for ALL Blu-rays. In fact, most BDs ONLY have 5.1 or 7.1 audio, so this would be a big problem if equipment was not designed to deal with this exact scenario.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 03:09 PM   #9
Lincoln6Echo Lincoln6Echo is offline
Special Member
 
Lincoln6Echo's Avatar
 
Sep 2009
4
312
1517
8
25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dougotte View Post
Thanks, Jeff. A lot of posters here are writing incomplete or erroneous info. By setting your player to output stereo, it should downmix the lossless 5.1 track. Info from all the channels will be retained, but mixed down to 2 channels.

Doug
Yeah, that's what I'm saying...on my Oppo, you can set the unit to down-mix any track to whatever speaker set-up you have. I don't have 7.1, but I do have 5.1, so I just set it to down-mix to 5.1 and it "squeezes" those extra channels into the two surrounds.

But in anycase, I can't believe people who have upgraded to BD are still just using TV speakers as their sound source. Hell, when I upgraded to DVD back in '01, I made sure to have a dedicated 5.1 system. It was severely under-powered and LFE was severely lacking (2 built-in 40W subs into the FL/FR channels), and it couldn't even decode DTS, but I got a 720W system with a dedicated 120W sub that sits on the floor.

And the reason why I didn't get a then, 6.1 set-up, (7.1 mixes and receivers for that matter, weren't even around then) because I had no where to put that 6th speaker. My surround speakers straddle a window and that 6th speaker would have have to gone where the window is.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 05:20 PM   #10
dougotte dougotte is offline
Expert Member
 
Jul 2009
181
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lincoln6Echo View Post
But in anycase, I can't believe people who have upgraded to BD are still just using TV speakers as their sound source. Hell, when I upgraded to DVD back in '01, I made sure to have a dedicated 5.1 system. It was severely under-powered and LFE was severely lacking (2 built-in 40W subs into the FL/FR channels), and it couldn't even decode DTS, but I got a 720W system with a dedicated 120W sub that sits on the floor.
It depends on the situation. Our main LR system has a fairly nice surround setup (Marantz AVR, KEF speakers), but I have a second setup in a tiny area in the basement. This is my escape cave when the wife and daughter have taken over the LR to watch Biggest Loser or something similar. In the basement, I just have room for a 32" TV, FiOS box, and blu player.

I first tried setting the blu to downmix to a DD track, but realized that it downmixes to stereo just fine w/ the lossless track instead, and sounds better, too.

Doug

Last edited by dougotte; 06-24-2010 at 05:28 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 03:55 AM   #11
charlieray1 charlieray1 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
charlieray1's Avatar
 
Nov 2008
Victorville, CA
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by un4gvn94538 View Post
edit: would it be better to select the lossy track? some people just prefer a 2 channel set up for what ever reason.
Yes! If the choice is between hearing the complete lossy soundtrack or hearing just a portion of the soundtrack in lossless audio . . . lossy obviously wins.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 04:02 AM   #12
HD Goofnut HD Goofnut is online now
Blu-ray King
 
HD Goofnut's Avatar
 
May 2010
Far, Far Away
114
743
2373
128
751
1091
598
133
39
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by charlieray1 View Post
Yes! If the choice is between hearing the complete lossy soundtrack or hearing just a portion of the soundtrack in lossless audio . . . lossy obviously wins.
I agree. If a person has a 2.0 or 2.1 setup and there's a lossy Dolby Digital 2.0 track then that would be the better choice over a lossless track. There are a few 2.0 lossless tracks out there, but they are heavily outnumbered by 5.1 and 7.1.

Last edited by HD Goofnut; 06-24-2010 at 02:42 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 10:00 AM   #13
Kyo28 Kyo28 is offline
Power Member
 
Kyo28's Avatar
 
Jun 2008
446
12
Default

I have all three season and they all play just fine. My setup is:
- PS3
- Onkyo TX-SR607 receiver
- 5.1 B&W speaker & subwoofer setup

I've watched them all in DTS HD MA 7.1 and had no problems at all. However, I think this really depends on your setup and people watching those with their TV speakers might be better off with the lossy 2.0. I tried the DTS HD MA 7.1 through my TV speakers but also didn't notice any problems, except that I had to turn up the volume a few notches.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:30 PM.