more director's cut please

[Skillz5]

I agree with the Pearl Harbor Directors Cut. I felt that the gore took away from the film. I find myself watching the Theatrical cut. I did enjoy the added Alec Baldwin scene, but the gore was just too much for a historical film. I enjoy Micheal Bay films now since the release of Pearl Harbor, but it seems he could not keep his hand out of the cookie jar when it came to gore.

There are very few films where I watch the theatrical over the DC.

[ClaytonMG]

Originally Posted by Skillz5

I agree with the Pearl Harbor Directors Cut. I felt that the gore took away from the film. I find myself watching the Theatrical cut. I did enjoy the added Alec Baldwin scene, but the gore was just too much for a historical film. I enjoy Micheal Bay films now since the release of Pearl Harbor, but it seems he could not keep his hand out of the cookie jar when it came to gore.

There are very few films where I watch the theatrical over the DC.

You know, it's funny. I have no problem with the violence and gore in Bad Boys II (there's a tone of it). But with Pearl Harbor, everything looked so pretty and the way it was filmed was amazing, then the gore comes on and it totally distracts from everything because you're to busy going "that's gross and inappropriate."

But like I said, that's why seamless branching is soooo important and such a great idea (at least on Blu-Ray, on regular DVD it was more of a distraction). Hopefully Me, Myself & Irene will use seemless branching as well... But I think they'd have to remaster the added scenes a little better...