Another way High-Def Digest is biased towards HD DUD: Delayed reviews for bad HD DUDs

		Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Another way High-Def Digest is biased towards HD DUD: Delayed reviews for bad HD DUDs

12-12-2007, 03:31 AM

#18

richard lichtenfelt richard lichtenfelt is offline

Power Member

Member since:Jul 2007

Location:I'm not drunk, I'm just tired cause I been up all night drinking.

Blu-ray reviews:3

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alan Gordon

Actually, his latest column on uncompressed audio was his LEAST biased column I've read from him. It explained the differences between PCM, Dolby TrueHD, and DTS-HD MA, and I don't remember any HD DVD "spin" or belittling of "Blu-ray" even though I was looking hard for it given the writer.

~Alan

From his article "That's not a knock against Master Audio, but rather a limitation imposed by the playback hardware."
It was subtle, but isn't all sabotage done with labored sneakiness.
He is addressing the recent news of 60% of blu-rays having uncompressed audio to 20% of hd dvds, and the whole article is meant to say that it is a non-issue. The theme is the same as his "the blu-ray movie sales advantage doesn't matter because the overall sales #'s are insignificant" article.

Similar Threads
thread	Forum	Thread Starter	Replies	Last Post
high def digest?	General Chat	junglalien	2	04-02-2008 12:33 PM
Is High Def Digest Down?	Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology	Living Near Shamu	42	12-10-2007 11:10 PM
hi-def digest reviews just unfair	Blu-ray Movies - North America	jorg	4	08-23-2007 12:51 AM
HD DVD Reviews by Hi-Def Digest	General Chat	Blu-Ray Buckeye	7	06-20-2007 10:39 PM

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

Forum Jump

All times are GMT. The time now is 08:28 AM.

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals