nyphomaninc uncut ? or cut ?

[crazybeats]

I think the reason a longer cut has not been submitted is because the studio knows not to waste their money submitting it, there's no chance of the longest cut getting approved without something being flagged. Let me just shorten it down in a more what you might call, PG way. I think anything that is rated 18 should be uncut. I know studios pre cut things or they give different cuts to different countries and sometimes they make additional cuts to get a lower rating and I understand why that is done.

With a film like this, that doesn't apply. This would never be cut for a 15 or 12A because I don't believe the film is aimed at the mass market. I think this film and many others like it are there because the people behind it have spent a lot of love and labour on it and aren't in it for the money and the awards and adoration from critics. I think the audience expects that too and I wont go as far as saying this is an art house film but I know the BBFC have been very good with art house films over the years and have been very lenient in regards to content and the aim of the films and there's stuff right now in high street stores uncut and uncensored and the only reason they are uncut is they are under that 'art house' banner.


I think more work should be done.