As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
7 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
22 hrs ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
23 hrs ago
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.48
1 day ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2014, 12:52 AM   #1
sarah_wentworth sarah_wentworth is offline
Expert Member
 
sarah_wentworth's Avatar
 
Jun 2014
canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by geekesmind View Post
i would buy the animated series in a heartbeat if it ever came out on blu. I grew up with that show.
i grew up on kraft dinner
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2014, 02:05 AM   #2
J.R. Lopez J.R. Lopez is offline
Active Member
 
J.R. Lopez's Avatar
 
Oct 2012
5
308
88
9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarah_wentworth View Post
i grew up on kraft dinner


I believe this image make you.......
LOL!
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
sarah_wentworth (08-22-2014), The Edge (10-24-2014)
Old 08-22-2014, 06:02 AM   #3
sarah_wentworth sarah_wentworth is offline
Expert Member
 
sarah_wentworth's Avatar
 
Jun 2014
canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.R. Lopez View Post


I believe this image make you.......
LOL!
actually it makes me hungry....*gulp*
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2014, 06:07 AM   #4
sarah_wentworth sarah_wentworth is offline
Expert Member
 
sarah_wentworth's Avatar
 
Jun 2014
canada
Default

i don't know anything about VC-1, MPEG 2, or AVC but is one of them the absolute best and why isn't the best one always used? if a movie is costing millions to make why not use the best one to make sure it looks as good as can be? just curious
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2014, 09:34 PM   #5
Neomic Neomic is offline
Active Member
 
Jul 2011
Mishawaka, IN, USA
140
49
41
7
20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarah_wentworth View Post
i don't know anything about VC-1, MPEG 2, or AVC but is one of them the absolute best and why isn't the best one always used? if a movie is costing millions to make why not use the best one to make sure it looks as good as can be? just curious
AVC-MPEG4 is generally the only one used now days since it's far superior, but in the early days of Blu-ray, a lot of releases were just ports of their HD-DVD counterparts, which supported VC-1 and MPEG2, so a lot of movies from those days still use those same encodes ported from release to release.

Most movie studios don't bother re-encoding the master for AVC since most of those encodes fall under their (and sometimes our) "good enough" category.

As cool as it would be to get a new master for this film, I don't see it looking much better since it was made to look pretty drab in the first place. A new master might be a tad sharper, but unless you're watching on a large screen or have your television professionally calibrated, the difference probably wouldn't even be noticeable.

Then again, I could be wrong and a new transfer could be a night-and-day difference.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Trekkie313 (08-22-2014)
Old 08-22-2014, 10:13 PM   #6
SteamPunkCat SteamPunkCat is offline
Senior Member
 
SteamPunkCat's Avatar
 
Sep 2011
The Land of Mary
38
287
51
2
Thumbs up

I really like Tim Burton's world of Batman. I just think the characters and visuals deserved better storylines. (Even though there are many parallels to '89 Joker's plans to Heath Ledger's Joker's plan.) Otherwise, I would own both Batman & Batman Returns.

Just of curiosity, did they ever remove the purple paint from Jack Nicholson's neck for the Blu-ray?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2014, 11:15 PM   #7
Region_unlocked Region_unlocked is offline
Power Member
 
Jan 2014
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SteamPunkCat View Post
Just of curiosity, did they ever remove the purple paint from Jack Nicholson's neck for the Blu-ray?
Nope, still there.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2014, 01:59 AM   #8
sarah_wentworth sarah_wentworth is offline
Expert Member
 
sarah_wentworth's Avatar
 
Jun 2014
canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neomic View Post
AVC-MPEG4 is generally the only one used now days since it's far superior, but in the early days of Blu-ray, a lot of releases were just ports of their HD-DVD counterparts, which supported VC-1 and MPEG2, so a lot of movies from those days still use those same encodes ported from release to release.

Most movie studios don't bother re-encoding the master for AVC since most of those encodes fall under their (and sometimes our) "good enough" category.

As cool as it would be to get a new master for this film, I don't see it looking much better since it was made to look pretty drab in the first place. A new master might be a tad sharper, but unless you're watching on a large screen or have your television professionally calibrated, the difference probably wouldn't even be noticeable.

Then again, I could be wrong and a new transfer could be a night-and-day difference.
Hey thanks! just for theck of it i'm going to pay attention to different encodes
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2014, 12:58 PM   #9
Neomic Neomic is offline
Active Member
 
Jul 2011
Mishawaka, IN, USA
140
49
41
7
20
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sarah_wentworth View Post
Hey thanks! just for theck of it i'm going to pay attention to different encodes
VC-1 is actually a decent codec and can have great results, but the one most people flip out about (and rightfully so) is MPEG2 since it's a very old codec (1996) and usually is accompanied by a ton of video anomalies that can easily be avoided by using one of the better codecs.

Sadly, some studios still do cheap out. The American Pie trilogy used old MPEG2 masters done for the DVDs, converted to MPEG4. Basically the equivalent of putting a turd in shrink-wrap. lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 08:27 AM   #10
ravenus ravenus is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
ravenus's Avatar
 
Dec 2010
India
6
6
1200
144
184
8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Neomic View Post
Then again, I could be wrong and a new transfer could be a night-and-day difference.
Not a good phrase to use in this case, Batman prefers the night
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 09:04 AM   #11
GP Legend GP Legend is offline
Banned
 
GP Legend's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
BC, Canada
45
273
53
11
Default

If it's just the same transfer and that new bonus feature isn't significant, I will just get the four-film favourites edition that has all four movies in a nice, single bluray case to save on shelf space. Much better deal, since it is under $30 for all four movies. However, I will hold off on getting it until we know exactly what will be in this release.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-2014, 09:03 AM   #12
StingingVelvet StingingVelvet is offline
Blu-ray Grand Duke
 
StingingVelvet's Avatar
 
Jan 2014
Philadelphia, PA
849
2329
111
12
69
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluRay84 View Post
I thought Batman looked fantastic on blu ray personally the best I've ever seen it and Batman: Returns transfers' amazing. I've come to realise though that some films just won't look particularly impressive in HD no matter how well it's worked on I mean Batman on blu ray looks really sharp but often quite dull too. Some films seem to have a really dull look to them (I guess it's the way it was filmed) and in my opinion wouldn't really benefit from being remastered. Like you say we could be wrong though and a 4k remaster could look miles better than the original blu ray release but somehow I doubt it.
Batman could look better with a new 4k scan I'm sure, but yeah, for the most part it looks good. The film is never going to amaze due to how it was shot.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2014, 09:23 AM   #13
rockin rockin is offline
Active Member
 
rockin's Avatar
 
Sep 2010
240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StingingVelvet View Post
Batman could look better with a new 4k scan I'm sure, but yeah, for the most part it looks good. The film is never going to amaze due to how it was shot.
Yeah I agree - Batman was never one of those benchmark looking films, but a 4K scan could squeeze some more detail into it - look at Ghostbusters for example.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Marv Inc. (09-27-2014)
Old 08-22-2014, 01:40 PM   #14
jayman3 jayman3 is offline
Banned
 
Jul 2013
Orlando, FL
Default

*Cue sarcasm* I'm going to wait another five years for the 30th Anniversary set

All jokes aside, I already own the 4-pack blu-ray so I don't need to get this edition.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-22-2014, 08:29 PM   #15
sarah_wentworth sarah_wentworth is offline
Expert Member
 
sarah_wentworth's Avatar
 
Jun 2014
canada
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayman3 View Post
*Cue sarcasm* I'm going to wait another five years for the 30th Anniversary set

All jokes aside, I already own the 4-pack blu-ray so I don't need to get this edition.
i just bought the 4 pack. if the video quality is the same i'll just keep that one
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:32 PM.