As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
9 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
How to Train Your Dragon (Blu-ray)
$19.99
2 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
1 day ago
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
1 day ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 09-01-2014, 09:01 PM   #14
Cliff Cliff is offline
Blu-ray Insider
 
Nov 2009
Woodland Hills, CA
15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lolwut View Post
The rating scale for Special Features on this site is unusually harsh. Blu-rays with lots of good special features get much lower scores than the PQ and AQ, even if there's nothing negative the reviewer says about them. With the exception of Criterion releases which get high marks in that area even if there are only a handful of special features.
Agreed. If the ratings don't mean anything then how are they supposed to be interpreted? I agree about certain titles/labels seemingly being favored. Criterion's Harold and Maude contains a commentary, a 12 minute featurette and about 28 minutes of archival audio excerpts, yet rates a 4/5 for extras. Shout also seems to get love on occasion. The Shadow has a 23 minute featurette (the same as They Came Together), a trailer (the same as TCT), and a still gallery (but lacks TCT's commentary, 100 minute table read or 30+ minutes of deleted scenes) and rates a 2.5 from Mr. Kauffman versus TCT's 2/5. Yet he's less favorable to their Cat People, which gets the same 2.5 for having nearly 45 minutes of new interviews with cast and crew.

I guess I can't figure out if he and the rest of the reviewers are grading based on -number of features, -quality of features, -length of features, or just some random methodology that only they understand. Why, for example, does Captain America The Winter Soldier score 3/5 with a commentary and approx 22 minutes of features total (Kenneth Brown even comments on the light supplemental package) against Draft Day (another title I produced releasing this week) which contains a commentary, about 8 minutes of deleted scenes, trailer, a 10 minute featurette on the NFL Draft, and... oh yeah, a brand new, exclusively produced 60 minute documentary on the making of the movie featuring all-new interviews with Kevin Costner, Jennifer Garner, Ivan Reitman, the screenwriters, the editors, the VFX artists, the composer, and additional actors? Cause Draft Day also rated a 3/5. Is it JUST because it's Captain America or is it because Captain America breaks that 22 minutes up into 5 different pieces... creating the illusion of more content versus our decision to present a full, self-contained 60 minute making-of doc? It's frustrating because I respect Blu-ray.com and their reviews. Maybe I'm giving them too much credit.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
lolwut (09-02-2014)
 
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:06 PM.