Which Fantastic 4 film did you like more

[KilloWertz]

Originally Posted by Diesel

I bought the 3 pack when it was $24.99 as I figured the two FF movies were worth $12.50 to me

I've never seen Daredevil, but I'll give it at least once shot to see if I by some chance happen to like it.
If I don't like it that is saying quite a bit, I mean, I like Scorpion King...

I liked the Scorpion King and didn't care that much for Daredevil (outside of getting to watch Jennifer Garner as Elektra), so your last sentence is flawed. You may actually like it, but either way, you basically got it for free anyways.

To actually answer the poll though, I liked both.

[GOAT]

Originally Posted by Lord_Stewie

I liked the original.

but didnt vote for it im guessing since it has 0 votes? lol

[GOAT]

Originally Posted by Meeklo

Where's the option for the 1994 Roger Corman produced Fantastic Four movie?

I completly forgot that one... did it ever get a release? Wasnt it just made to keep the copyright?

[vegeta88]

Silver Surfer. Both have their problems (Alba for one) but I think Silver Surfer was pretty cool (played by the awesome Doug Jones). The first one was a bit slow and I felt it was a bit sillier; however, I have not watched it in a while. I just bought the Marvel pack so I'll go through them again.

[Lord_Stewie]

Originally Posted by GOAT

but didnt vote for it im guessing since it has 0 votes? lol

Just voted. LOL.

[ScarredLungs]

Neither of them are favorites of mine, but alas, I would choose the 1st one over the second one.

[koontz1973]

Like them both for what they are.

Switch of brain popcorn films.

[Groo The Perverted]

Originally Posted by GOAT

I completly forgot that one... did it ever get a release? Wasnt it just made to keep the copyright?

Was made to keep the copyright, with no intentions of releasing it.

The Fantastic Four is an unreleased low-budget feature film completed in 1994. Created to secure copyright to the property, the producers never intended it for release although the director, actors, and other participants were not informed of this fact.

In 1992, Constantin Film was about to lose its option on the film rights for Fantastic Four, unless production began by December. Without the $40 million in necessary funding for a full-budget film, producer Bernd Eichinger turned to Roger Corman for help. Corman spent $1.98 million to shoot the movie.

Constantin Film permitted the director, actors and others involved in the film to believe that the studio intended to release it in theaters, rather than the film being a cinematic equivalent of an ashcan copy.[1][2] The cast and crew did the film for low salaries after being told that if it did not get released to theaters, it would be used as the pilot for a potential television series.

Filming lasted a month and finished in January 1993, after which post-production began. The cast gave press interviews and attended comic book conventions in good faith. The studio announced a premiere date of 1994, at the Mall of America in Minnesota. In late 1993, the studio announced that the film would not be released.

[Kryptonic]

Neither are particularly good, but I enjoyed the first film as far as summer popcorn films go. A lot of wasted potential with this franchise. The second was mostly a dud. I enjoyed the exchanging of powers, but felt Galactus was a huge missed opportunity and the Silver Surfer kind of lackluster and wasted.

[GOAT]

Originally Posted by Dreaming in Blu

Was made to keep the copyright, with no intentions of releasing it.

that is what I thought.. thanks for confirming

[P@t_Mtl]

I will say what I've said in every other threads about F4 movies. I like them both. I take them for what they are, movies base on a comic book about 4 people that wear blue suite, one guy can stretch, one girl can become invisible, one turn into a flame and fly and the other is a giant rock that talks.

[CaptainYoda]

I liked them both. They were fun movies. Not as serious as some other movies.

[Lt. Aldo Raine]

the 2nd one was better, but was still pretty crap

the 1st ones cgi has not aged well already, is was poorly done

and the 2nd ones isnt that great either

[Tcan21]

I thought both weren't very good

[Oateyboat]

No Third Installment. Reboot. Since Disney's new management looms over hot Marvel properties, Fox decided to give it a reboot, hoping for success a la Batman Begins & Casino Royale

[Moefiz]

Rise Of The Silver Surfer....much better than the first.

[BlackMamba]

I liked 2 more. The Silver Surfer was cool.

[Deadset]

Originally Posted by Moefiz

Rise Of The Silver Surfer....much better than the first.

We agree Moe!

[SpaceDog]

Both of these movies felt like quick cash-ins on superherohype after X-men and Spider-man. I was shocked they greenlit a sequel.
The second one was perhaps worse... Silver Surfer - Herald of a scary cloud.

[CHERRYGARCIA]

Originally Posted by kryptonic

neither are particularly good, but i enjoyed the first film as far as summer popcorn films go. A lot of wasted potential with this franchise. The second was mostly a dud. I enjoyed the exchanging of powers, but felt galactus was a huge missed opportunity and the silver surfer kind of lackluster and wasted.

q4t