|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $29.96 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 | ![]() $29.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.49 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 | ![]() $34.96 | ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $80.68 | ![]() $37.99 | ![]() $47.99 | ![]() $20.99 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.99 |
![]() |
#21 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
hehe Disney's vote in September was a good one in my opinion keeping them good with there consumer base.There 2.0 vote is a brilliant follow up....Disney shows there customers they want to give the best and HD-DVD cant provide...It puts HD-DVD on the spot to meet BR standards when it comes to disk space which cant be done with there current player lineup. Toshiba has lost alot of MONEY and wont make the grade..hmm I wounder how much they would charge for that triple layer player .....99.99 lol lol .This war will be over late 2008.Toshiba is to stretched. Last edited by Sling; 11-20-2007 at 01:18 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
Moderator
|
![]()
Because Disney has been involved there since the beginning. They're the rare member that actually has voted on HD DVD related items whereas everyone else abstains. And remember that they were quite involved with HDi as well. So they have their reasons for keeping some amount of control there but their focus is with Blu-ray.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Blu-ray Count
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
Jun 2007
Omaha NE
-
-
-
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
Expert Member
Feb 2007
Colorado Springs, CO
|
![]()
Thanks for all the info. You guys are awesome on putting the facts straight
|
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
Junior Member
Nov 2007
|
![]()
I am not sure if Disney will be going HD but they probably will if both formats stay around for another year or so
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
Special Member
|
![]()
Why do you think Disney would go HD dvd if both formats are still competing for another year?
Last edited by Sling; 11-20-2007 at 02:46 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Banned
May 2007
Brussels, Belgium
|
![]()
What does this mean ? voting for the hd-dvd ??? why is Disney even there voting at all ?
Anyone understands or knows this ? http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/multime..._Approval.html |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Member
Jan 2007
|
![]() ![]() Disney Votes for 51GB HD DVD Media Approval. |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
Active Member
Apr 2007
|
![]()
Don't look to far into it. It's just technology nothing more. Was I the only one that caught them saying New Line was HD exclusive when we are getting them miles ahead of HD?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
And, who knows what their motivations were in voting for the 51GB disc? Perhaps they see an advantage to allowing a Media format onto the market that won't work with all 3 current generation players. This scenario will most likely force consumers to purchase another HD DVD player in order to support the new disc. That would certainly put a halt to HD DVD disc sales.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Member
Jan 2007
|
![]()
Strange how the media spins this story...BUT, I still feel we need to show DISNEY our FULL SUPPORT! I'm gonna pick up CARS this week!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
Disney is smart, they are successful. the 51 GB disc does nothing to increase bandwidth, BD will STILL have space advantages with 100gb discs.....i see nothing wrong with the company making the smart move of planning for the future...if we get stuck with HD DVD id like to have 51 gb discs.....
Id vote yes for it also, im realistic. |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Member
Jan 2007
|
![]()
For the record...I DID look for an existing article. Thanx!
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
Expert Member
May 2007
|
![]() Quote:
I would personally be happy if Disney demanded higher bandwidth (with 1.5x spin rate) and TL51s, got them and then released on HD DVD. At that point the lowest common denominator wouldn't mean much lower limits for HD DVD. I like Blu-ray, but it is mostly because they didn't make the 1.0x spin rate mistake (IMO) the HD DVD side made and I think it would be great if the HD DVD side would step up and fix that mistake, instead of trying to stick us with that bad decision for years. I don't expect them to fix that one at this point (even though if they had it to do over again, I don't think they would make the same decision), but if they did fix their bandwidth issue and also went to 51GB, I wouldn't have a problem with them winning. --Darin Last edited by darinp2; 11-20-2007 at 07:08 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
Junior Member
Jul 2007
Norway
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
What does the "approved" 51GB HD DVD mean for Blu-ray? | General Chat | Mpalmieri1203 | 219 | 02-06-2008 10:55 PM |
Picture of new 51GB HD-DVD | General Chat | xwingsct | 14 | 12-31-2007 05:10 AM |
HD-DVD 51GB Final Approval? | General Chat | sphdle1 | 5 | 11-22-2007 01:04 PM |
51GB HD-DVD discs Ready for production | General Chat | yoda79 | 11 | 09-10-2007 05:16 PM |
|
|