As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
1 hr ago
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
3 hrs ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
7 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
1 day ago
Black Eye (Blu-ray)
$9.99
5 hrs ago
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.33
 
How to Train Your Dragon (Blu-ray)
$19.99
21 hrs ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
1 day ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2007, 11:47 PM   #61
GreenMotion GreenMotion is offline
Special Member
 
Apr 2007
82
1064
10
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CAB View Post
Rich.
They better stash it in the bank, because its not going to last.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007, 11:56 PM   #62
CAB CAB is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
CAB's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
::1
88
1827
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenMotion View Post
They better stash it in the bank, because its not going to last.
Sir, I suspect $100 to $150 milion was tons more than they'd make in profit off BD sales for the next 18 months. All they have to release is catalog titles, Shrek III, Transformers, and Knocked Up. I'd have bought all three if on blu along with another 100,000 maybe so that's what: half a mil and change in profit? In 15 months, we'll all go back to buying their titles one way or the other. It's not like I can get Shrek III from Sony.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007, 11:56 PM   #63
miked924 miked924 is offline
Expert Member
 
miked924's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
Queens, NY
5
295
1038
22
4
1
2
Default

I own an hd dvd player and if they start releasing movies on these discs then I think my hd dvd buying days are over...no way would I buy a new player!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007, 11:56 PM   #64
Sir Terrence Sir Terrence is offline
Sound Insider/M.P.S.E.
 
Sir Terrence's Avatar
 
Dec 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Torrance View Post
They SHOULD agree that this is a huge blow to hd-dvd... because it IS!

A few weeks back, their beloved RDJam was gloating over the announcement of the TL51 (and I remember his posts around that time, suggesting that it was bigger than the Paramount news... and added a smug "<giggle>" or two in there). He got everyone's hopes up over there. Then rumors of how quickly TL51 discs were going to hit the market... maybe even by this Christmas!

Yea, right. A nice dose of reality is what they need right about now. A reality that a lot of us over on this forum have known for a long time.
What is worse is reading what David Vaughn had to say on this. He said that TL51 was compatible with current players, all they had to do is tilt the drive a bit to get it to read the disk. So how do you tilt the drive of a player already in my house??? This shows you just how much an insider he really is.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2007, 11:58 PM   #65
Elandyll Elandyll is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Elandyll's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
MD
188
1
Default

Quote:
My feeling is that this isn't something that the HD DVD supporter wanted because they believe it is needed, rather to take away a talking point for the BD crowd.
The way I see it, the "talking point" response of HD-DVD has been shot by the anounce of BD-100 a mere 2-3 weeks after their anounce of a theoric TL-51, and obliterated after the prototype was shown another week later, alongside TDK anouncing its first tests and a very possible compatibility with existing players only needing a soft patch.
Some HD-DVD suporters seem to revert to their "30Gb is enough" motto, but they know full well that having all of a HD movie plus bonuses in HD in one disc is huge, as well as fitting an entire season of your fav. TV show in HD in 40% less discs (BD-50 vs HDDVD 30) would reduce the price of a set drastically... Let's not even talk about a 100gb with the price of a full Season set in mind.... Can you say all of House HD on 4x BD-100 vs 12x HD-DVDs ?

Last edited by Elandyll; 10-10-2007 at 12:01 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 12:02 AM   #66
BluThunder BluThunder is offline
Member
 
BluThunder's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Hollywood, CA
117
5
Default

HD-DVD was an inferior format from the start. If, and only if I were a HD-DVD owner and hear that I need to buy a new player, I would switch to Blu-ray right NOW!

HD-DVD is crap!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 12:10 AM   #67
BluThunder BluThunder is offline
Member
 
BluThunder's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Hollywood, CA
117
5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenMotion View Post
I wonder how Paramount feels now.
They don't know nothing! Wrong choice supporting HD-DVD exclusively.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 12:19 AM   #68
PaulGo PaulGo is offline
Power Member
 
PaulGo's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
North Potomac, MD
Default

I do like David Vaughn's response to my post:

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...9#post11859119
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 12:20 AM   #69
Tru-way Tru-way is offline
Senior Member
 
Tru-way's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
2
Default

I find it hallarious how the HD-DVD fanboys kept saying how 30gb is enough and theres no need for a crazy dual layer 50gb disc.

Now that theres a crazy tripler layer 51gb disc for HD-DVD what will the idiot fan boys that said 30gb was enough say? obviously if Toshiba went out of there way to make a 51gb disc then 30gb was just not enough.

Im glad I invested in Blu-ray and dindt have to worry about boiling discs, future absolete players, bait and switch tricks, inferior media, etc..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 12:23 AM   #70
Slapper Slapper is offline
Special Member
 
Slapper's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
I live in a pineapple under the sea...
277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shadowmoon View Post
Well, I posted it on AVS.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showt...3#post11859683

We will see how scorched I will be when they say 'oh hes a BD supporter, this is just FUD', and I get banned with my 2 post counts over there lol. Maybe I should start a poll on how fast my post will be deleted and me banned for life lol.

This is a huge blow to HD DVD if this holds true, or Toshiba finds a way around the lens issue. Can very well determine the outcome of the format war.

TL51 success or failure will not determine the outcome of the war, IMO. Storage capacity is NOT HD-DVD's biggest problem. BANDWIDTH IMO is HD-DVD's biggest problem. Most of HD-DVDs other problems are listed in my sig (in no particular order).
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 12:41 AM   #71
pscoop pscoop is offline
Active Member
 
pscoop's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Tuksin
64
1
Default

Wow it got ugly over there fast. And why do they get so bent out of shape when people hyphenate HD DVD?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 12:57 AM   #72
Xerious Xerious is offline
Special Member
 
Xerious's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Washington, DC
238
4
Send a message via AIM to Xerious
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slapper View Post
TL51 success or failure will not determine the outcome of the war, IMO. Storage capacity is NOT HD-DVD's biggest problem. BANDWIDTH IMO is HD-DVD's biggest problem. Most of HD-DVDs other problems are listed in my sig (in no particular order).
bandwidth is the key. not to mention, i don't know if this has been said but what if this was for data storage and not movies... whatever the case may be, hd dvd = t3h suk
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 01:21 AM   #73
Slapper Slapper is offline
Special Member
 
Slapper's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
I live in a pineapple under the sea...
277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Xerious View Post
bandwidth is the key. not to mention, i don't know if this has been said but what if this was for data storage and not movies... whatever the case may be, hd dvd = t3h suk
Toshiba/HD-DVD have enough problems with the "write" drives for the 30gig discs. Add another layer and they'll have even more problems. I don't see TL51 discs ever making it to market in any form. Kind of like Warner's oft-delayed TotalHD discs. TL51 and TotalHD look nice on paper though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 01:30 AM   #74
Clark Kent Clark Kent is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Clark Kent's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Metropolis
2
184
Default

The Myth of The Triple Layer

I don't believe any of the higher ups in the HD DVD camp ever seriously thought that this technology would ever be brought to market but used it mostly for on-line spin purposes. Wasn't it an amazing coincidence that the triple layer HD DVD was exactly 51 GB, 1 GB more than BD-Rom's 50 GB. It was simply a misleading bulletin point to counteract Blu-ray's real technical advantage and give wild-eyed HD DVD fanboys something to cling to.

But when Amir(I think he was the original source of this or at least he publicized it enough on the insiders thread at AVSforums) leaked this out, it's amazing how it spread like wildfire though the minds of HD DVD supporters.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 01:34 AM   #75
Tru 2 Blu Tru 2 Blu is offline
Active Member
 
Tru 2 Blu's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mnelsoneorm View Post
Oh, come on, I feel bad for anyone who has an HD-DVD player, so be nice to them. Let them vent to you, cry on your shoulder, and then take them to BB or Fry's or whatever and help them pick out their new BD player .

lol. This has to be a classic .
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 01:35 AM   #76
Hayashi Hayashi is offline
Member
 
Hayashi's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Hawaii
Default

Hahaha the way this is unfolding just sounds like a classic Microsoft thing. And why would you want a 51g disc for backup when you can get a 100g blu-ray lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 01:42 AM   #77
Slapper Slapper is offline
Special Member
 
Slapper's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
I live in a pineapple under the sea...
277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Clark Kent View Post
The Myth of The Triple Layer

I don't believe any of the higher ups in the HD DVD camp ever seriously thought that this technology would ever be brought to market but used it mostly for on-line spin purposes. Wasn't it an amazing coincidence that the triple layer HD DVD was exactly 51 GB, 1 GB more than BD-Rom's 50 GB. It was simply a misleading bulletin point to counteract Blu-ray's real technical advantage and give wild-eyed HD DVD fanboys something to cling to.

But when Amir(I think he was the original source of this or at least he publicized it enough on the insiders thread at AVSforums) leaked this out, it's amazing how it spread like wildfire though the minds of HD DVD supporters.

The HD-DVD TL51 disc was a direct counter to BDs 50gig dual-layer disc no doubt. A normal dual-layer HD-DVD disc holds 30gig of data, or 15gig per layer. If they were going to do a "regular" triple layer disc they would have had 15gig+15gig+15gig - a TL45gig disc. This is still shy of BD's 50gig so HD-DVD/Toshiba had to squeeze more data onto each layer, pushing the "data area" closer to the edges of the disc (a la 80min CD) in order to get more capacity so that they could have a disc that has more storage than Blu-ray.

Spin, baby, spin!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 01:46 AM   #78
jw jw is offline
Blu-ray Archduke
 
jw's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
USA
519
Default

No studio has announced any title using TL51 discs. Who knows when/if that'll happen. I have a feeling it may never see the light of day.



a quote from that forums, that just shows you that hddvd is a one hit wonder, there was never any room for future technology to be administered in.
Those HDDVD's will look great on their shelves next to those DIVX discs from years ago. LMAO
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 01:56 AM   #79
tron3 tron3 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
tron3's Avatar
 
Aug 2004
New Jersey
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SKRUhddvd View Post
this news breaks just before the christmas season! how the hell will they sell any hddvd players now! i wonder now if the hddvd camp will be split into two factions the ones that can play all the movies and the ones that cant?
So within their own camp there will be the "haves" and "have nots". Brilliant marketing stratagy.

So what do we call this new "break through"? X3 DUD?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2007, 01:59 AM   #80
MatrixS2000 MatrixS2000 is offline
Power Member
 
MatrixS2000's Avatar
 
Mar 2007
Toronto, Canada
48
305
6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jason_grumpy View Post
But but but.. their spec is finalized!



Queue Nelson HAHA guy.

Exactly my thoughts! lol!
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Best buy no longer has hd dvd players listed on web General Chat I DO BLU 5 03-03-2008 04:25 AM
Best Buy high def mailer... no HD DVD players or movies Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Right of Might 23 09-26-2007 07:22 PM
Some good news - my local Best Buy clearanced HD DVD players Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology yankeedawg21 27 09-23-2007 02:32 AM
Fox: 10 Million BD players versus 100 Thousand HD DVD players Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology zombie 54 08-02-2006 05:26 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:25 AM.