|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $33.49 1 hr ago
| ![]() $33.49 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $27.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $9.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $35.33 | ![]() $19.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $27.57 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#62 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Sir, I suspect $100 to $150 milion was tons more than they'd make in profit off BD sales for the next 18 months. All they have to release is catalog titles, Shrek III, Transformers, and Knocked Up. I'd have bought all three if on blu along with another 100,000 maybe so that's what: half a mil and change in profit? In 15 months, we'll all go back to buying their titles one way or the other. It's not like I can get Shrek III from Sony.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#64 | |
Sound Insider/M.P.S.E.
Dec 2006
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#65 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
Some HD-DVD suporters seem to revert to their "30Gb is enough" motto, but they know full well that having all of a HD movie plus bonuses in HD in one disc is huge, as well as fitting an entire season of your fav. TV show in HD in 40% less discs (BD-50 vs HDDVD 30) would reduce the price of a set drastically... Let's not even talk about a 100gb with the price of a full Season set in mind.... Can you say all of House HD on 4x BD-100 vs 12x HD-DVDs ? Last edited by Elandyll; 10-10-2007 at 12:01 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#68 |
Power Member
![]() Aug 2007
North Potomac, MD
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#69 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I find it hallarious how the HD-DVD fanboys kept saying how 30gb is enough and theres no need for a crazy dual layer 50gb disc.
![]() Now that theres a crazy tripler layer 51gb disc for HD-DVD what will the idiot fan boys that said 30gb was enough say? obviously if Toshiba went out of there way to make a 51gb disc then 30gb was just not enough. ![]() Im glad I invested in Blu-ray and dindt have to worry about boiling discs, future absolete players, bait and switch tricks, inferior media, etc.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#70 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
TL51 success or failure will not determine the outcome of the war, IMO. Storage capacity is NOT HD-DVD's biggest problem. BANDWIDTH IMO is HD-DVD's biggest problem. Most of HD-DVDs other problems are listed in my sig (in no particular order). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#72 |
Special Member
|
![]()
bandwidth is the key. not to mention, i don't know if this has been said but what if this was for data storage and not movies... whatever the case may be, hd dvd = t3h suk
|
![]() |
![]() |
#73 |
Special Member
|
![]()
Toshiba/HD-DVD have enough problems with the "write" drives for the 30gig discs. Add another layer and they'll have even more problems. I don't see TL51 discs ever making it to market in any form. Kind of like Warner's oft-delayed TotalHD discs. TL51 and TotalHD look nice on paper though.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#74 |
Blu-ray Prince
|
![]()
The Myth of The Triple Layer
I don't believe any of the higher ups in the HD DVD camp ever seriously thought that this technology would ever be brought to market but used it mostly for on-line spin purposes. Wasn't it an amazing coincidence that the triple layer HD DVD was exactly 51 GB, 1 GB more than BD-Rom's 50 GB. It was simply a misleading bulletin point to counteract Blu-ray's real technical advantage and give wild-eyed HD DVD fanboys something to cling to. But when Amir(I think he was the original source of this or at least he publicized it enough on the insiders thread at AVSforums) leaked this out, it's amazing how it spread like wildfire though the minds of HD DVD supporters. |
![]() |
![]() |
#75 |
Active Member
Aug 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#76 |
Member
Sep 2007
Hawaii
|
![]()
Hahaha the way this is unfolding just sounds like a classic Microsoft thing. And why would you want a 51g disc for backup when you can get a 100g blu-ray lol
|
![]() |
![]() |
#77 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
The HD-DVD TL51 disc was a direct counter to BDs 50gig dual-layer disc no doubt. A normal dual-layer HD-DVD disc holds 30gig of data, or 15gig per layer. If they were going to do a "regular" triple layer disc they would have had 15gig+15gig+15gig - a TL45gig disc. This is still shy of BD's 50gig so HD-DVD/Toshiba had to squeeze more data onto each layer, pushing the "data area" closer to the edges of the disc (a la 80min CD) in order to get more capacity so that they could have a disc that has more storage than Blu-ray. Spin, baby, spin! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#78 |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]()
No studio has announced any title using TL51 discs. Who knows when/if that'll happen. I have a feeling it may never see the light of day.
a quote from that forums, that just shows you that hddvd is a one hit wonder, there was never any room for future technology to be administered in. Those HDDVD's will look great on their shelves next to those DIVX discs from years ago. LMAO |
![]() |
![]() |
#79 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
![]() So what do we call this new "break through"? X3 DUD? ![]() |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Best buy no longer has hd dvd players listed on web | General Chat | I DO BLU | 5 | 03-03-2008 04:25 AM |
Best Buy high def mailer... no HD DVD players or movies | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Right of Might | 23 | 09-26-2007 07:22 PM |
Some good news - my local Best Buy clearanced HD DVD players | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | yankeedawg21 | 27 | 09-23-2007 02:32 AM |
Fox: 10 Million BD players versus 100 Thousand HD DVD players | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | zombie | 54 | 08-02-2006 05:26 PM |
|
|