Batman (1989) (20th Anniversary Edition) - Page 5 - Blu-ray Forum

Blu Man · 11-18-2008, 12:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JackBauer24

Add a smilie or people are going to think you were serious.

Oh, this guy isn't jokeing, he's serious. He does not like Nolans Batmans, I think there the best ones but some people.......

GORT · 11-18-2008, 12:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Beast

No. They're way better than the two most recent so-called Batman films.

Ok Captain Ahab we get it you do not like Batman Begins or The Dark Knight

Midnightsailor · 11-18-2008, 01:04 AM

Nolan's movies are great but Burton's are damn good too. I honestly can't decide which ones are my favorites.

Kaiju · 11-18-2008, 02:59 AM

I think both directors did a good job with Batman, but for me it's Nolan's films over Burton's.

DetroitSportsFan · 11-18-2008, 03:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheMan

I think both directors did a good job with Batman, but for me it's Nolan's films over Burton's.

What about Schumacher?

Kaiju · 11-18-2008, 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DetroitSportsFan

What about Schumacher?

Haha, you know why I didn't mention him lol

Midnightsailor · 11-18-2008, 04:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DetroitSportsFan

What about Schumacher?

Those movies are great fun, though.

Copywriter · 11-18-2008, 05:28 AM

I'll be on this like white on rice. This Batman was great.

I still have the cups and stuff from the Taco Bell promotion.

Sad, yes.

mel2 · 11-18-2008, 07:10 AM

If sony, Fox, lionsgate, disney, universal, and paramount can provide extras in high def, why not warner?
the movie is already on the cusp of being bit-starved and probably will be on a BD25 so why not do a full BD50. I believe warner, for their catalog titles, are authoring these encodes to fit specifically on a BD25 instead of just doing the best that they can and let that determine the outcome.

AlexCruz · 11-18-2008, 07:21 AM

Wow... this came out the year I was born. The sound of "20th Anniversary" makes me feel old.

Midnightsailor · 11-18-2008, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mel2

If sony, Fox, lionsgate, disney, universal, and paramount can provide extras in high def, why not warner?
the movie is already on the cusp of being bit-starved and probably will be on a BD25 so why not do a full BD50. I believe warner, for their catalog titles, are authoring these encodes to fit specifically on a BD25 instead of just doing the best that they can and let that determine the outcome.

For some titles, this may be true. All studios should be aiming to impress new customers. I don't get it.

DigitalfreakNYC · 11-18-2008, 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AlexCruz

Wow... this came out the year I was born. The sound of "20th Anniversary" makes me feel old.

That's funny.

The sound of your saying that makes ME feel old.

Dave_6 · 11-18-2008, 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DigitalfreakNYC

That's funny.

The sound of your saying that makes ME feel old.

Same here

andy86i · 11-18-2008, 05:04 PM

this film was actually the first VHS i ever saw. my brother brought it home when it was released which probabley was about 1991.. cant wait to get the proper experience of it.

andy86i · 11-22-2008, 09:23 AM

a month to go till the uk releases, wooo

Kaiju · 11-22-2008, 06:03 PM

I remember I used to watch Batman 89 on VHS when I was really little and now I'll be watching The Dark Knight on Blu-ray

Oh how times change

chriharr · 11-27-2008, 04:17 PM

wow I looked at the specs of these movies

all feature Dolby TruHD lossless sound (sweetness) I'm sold, the first BATMAN movie has such a good soundtrack

andy86i · 11-27-2008, 04:20 PM

sweeet. do we know yet if the uk ones are dual layer? or do they need it?

Bear28 · 11-27-2008, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Midnightsailor

Nolan's movies are great but Burton's are damn good too. I honestly can't decide which ones are my favorites.

Im wondering if because of the gap between movies....if they can really be compared fairly...I think Burton's movies are the best, and I really like Keaton as Batman....buttt....

Nolan's movie were made 20ish years later and the technology (CGI, camera effects, etc) have all improved...so....I think it might be fairer to say, for the time Burton's movie kicked @$$ and will stand the test of time, but Nolan's movies, again for the time, also kick some @$$ and will stand up.

Does any of that make sense or do I need more coffee??

DigitalfreakNYC · 11-27-2008, 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by andy86i

sweeet. do we know yet if the uk ones are dual layer? or do they need it?

They would definitely need it to fit all the extras. Nothing has been confirmed yet, afaik.

Similar Threads
thread	Forum	Thread Starter	Replies	Last Post
Batman (1989)	United Kingdom and Ireland	RHINES4	31	04-07-2024 05:58 PM
Batman 1989 (Mayo 8)	Spanish	Buffalo MX	1	04-02-2009 10:55 PM
1989 Batman DVD Up-converted	Movies	Robmx	21	12-31-2007 02:26 AM

11-18-2008, 01:04 AM	#83
Midnightsailor Special Member Member since:Jan 2008 Location:Los Angeles, CA Blu-ray collection:32 Blu-ray reviews:1	Nolan's movies are great but Burton's are damn good too. I honestly can't decide which ones are my favorites.

11-18-2008, 02:59 AM	#84
Kaiju Blu-ray Knight Top contributor Member since:Oct 2008 4K collection:449 Blu-ray collection:1234 Trading Score:102	I think both directors did a good job with Batman, but for me it's Nolan's films over Burton's.

11-18-2008, 05:28 AM	#88
Copywriter Blu-ray Samurai Member since:Sep 2007 Location:Vegas Baby, Vegas	I'll be on this like white on rice. This Batman was great. I still have the cups and stuff from the Taco Bell promotion. Sad, yes.

11-18-2008, 07:10 AM	#89
mel2 Active Member Member since:Aug 2007	If sony, Fox, lionsgate, disney, universal, and paramount can provide extras in high def, why not warner? the movie is already on the cusp of being bit-starved and probably will be on a BD25 so why not do a full BD50. I believe warner, for their catalog titles, are authoring these encodes to fit specifically on a BD25 instead of just doing the best that they can and let that determine the outcome.

11-18-2008, 07:21 AM	#90
AlexCruz Expert Member Member since:Jan 2008 Location:Arkham Asylum, Gotham City Blu-ray collection:77 Blu-ray reviews:26	Wow... this came out the year I was born. The sound of "20th Anniversary" makes me feel old.

11-18-2008, 05:04 PM	#94
andy86i Active Member Member since:Jul 2008 Location:England Blu-ray collection:68 Blu-ray reviews: 2	this film was actually the first VHS i ever saw. my brother brought it home when it was released which probabley was about 1991.. cant wait to get the proper experience of it.

11-22-2008, 09:23 AM	#95
andy86i Active Member Member since:Jul 2008 Location:England Blu-ray collection:68 Blu-ray reviews: 2	a month to go till the uk releases, wooo

11-22-2008, 06:03 PM	#96
Kaiju Blu-ray Knight Top contributor Member since:Oct 2008 4K collection:449 Blu-ray collection:1234 Trading Score:102	I remember I used to watch Batman 89 on VHS when I was really little and now I'll be watching The Dark Knight on Blu-ray Oh how times change

11-27-2008, 04:17 PM	#97
chriharr Member Member since:Feb 2008 Location:Adelaide, SA . Australia Home Theater Gallery:4 Blu-ray collection:17 Blu-ray reviews:6	wow I looked at the specs of these movies all feature Dolby TruHD lossless sound (sweetness) I'm sold, the first BATMAN movie has such a good soundtrack

11-27-2008, 04:20 PM	#98
andy86i Active Member Member since:Jul 2008 Location:England Blu-ray collection:68 Blu-ray reviews: 2	sweeet. do we know yet if the uk ones are dual layer? or do they need it?

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals