|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $27.57 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.13 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $30.50 18 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.99 22 hrs ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $29.95 |
|
View Poll Results: Rate the movie (after you have seen it) | |||
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
19 | 5.57% |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
72 | 21.11% |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
104 | 30.50% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
113 | 33.14% |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
33 | 9.68% |
Voters: 341. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1081 |
Banned
Feb 2017
|
![]()
Lol they be asking dumbass questions why would Jurassic world 2 be the official title when Jurassic world is Jurassic park 4
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1083 |
Blu-ray Samurai
![]() Oct 2013
United Kingdom
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#1084 |
Power Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Hardback247 (05-30-2017) |
![]() |
#1085 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
The main complaint about JW actually IS the out of place silliness. It's a returning issue in almost all of the reviews. It has been discussed endlessly in these topics. One might not agree, but that doesn't change the fact it's a common problem people had with it. Even the crew of JW2 (JP5) mentioned how they wanted to avoid it.
Last edited by esteban²; 05-30-2017 at 10:50 AM. |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | UltraMario9 (05-30-2017) |
![]() |
#1086 |
Banned
|
![]()
‘No Plans Yet’ For Jurassic World 2 Trailer Yet!!!
http://jurassicoutpost.com/universal...easer-trailer/ |
![]() |
![]() |
#1090 | ||
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
Goosebumps. |
||
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#1091 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I've seen that JP teaser many years ago. There's even a high quality version of it at JPdatabase website. It is arguably the best teaser and perfectly captures the mysterious mood of the novel and the film. The JP2 teaser is very scary but not at all meaningful unlike this one above. It was a callback to the popularity of the T-Rex from the first film.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1095 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]()
Source: Coming Soon
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#1096 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | InuYashaCrusade (06-11-2017), Riddhi2011 (06-11-2017) |
![]() |
#1098 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Jurassic World 2 being shot digitally on Arri Alexa 65. Hawaii prep has begun -
https://twitter.com/ChrisLikesDinos/...738176/photo/1 Personally, I feel sad knowing that they abandoned film,which brought so much realism with its grit, grain, gorgeous colours and high contrast organic photography for the last four films. Bayona shot all of his movies on film, except 'A Monster Calls.' Now suddenly he lets go of film altogether. No matter 4K or 6K, digital images will never look like film. They almost always have that artificial sheen and a "very clean" and stable image. Spielberg was so insistent on film, John Schwartzman had said in an interview before JW came out. It seems Spielberg has much less involvement this time around. Perhaps having shot a live action movie digitally, he feels he cannot force others to work on film. Or maybe he's no longer that mentally invested in the franchise. Alexa 65 is the best digital camera in the industry now but it has a wholly different aesthetic than film. I also don't understand that Colin Trevorrow, who shot The Book of Henry on 35mm and is shooting Star Wars IX wholly on 65mm film formats was unable to have this movie shot on film. Anyway, the images can look good, like 'Rogue One,' or look really bland, like 'Passengers;' both shot on Alexa 65. |
![]() |
![]() |
#1100 |
Banned
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|