Jurassic Park Collection 4K UHD (1993-2015)

[Geoff D]

Originally Posted by trippledx3

Watching Jurrasic World now on disc and its stunning when it comes to resolution! Alot of grain, some not so good shots, but im only 30min in..

I keep forgetting that Jurassic World was shot on film.

[Hardback247]

Has JW's heavy blue tint been reduced?

[trippledx3]

So my take on the Jurrasic World 4K disc is that it is WAY better than the BD, i would put the best looking scenes in the same line as Transformers the last knight and almost The Revenant, its amazing. But, a few shots looks like they have DNR, a few shots is veeeery soft, i usuly like grain but there is a few scenes where the grain is a little bit annoying imo, the colours are better than the blu, but not as good as one would expect from a new film with HDR, the colour a bit more muted than i would like it to be, but only a bit. The resolution and detail is superb, especially the second half, BUT it really exposes the CGI at times, makes a couple of the dinosaurs look real fake at times, but all those negatives are just a few scenes. Im no reviewer obviosly, but i would rate this disc 8/10 for detail and resolution

[Vangeli]

So you're saying they haven't run out of Oblivion filters yet

[Hardback247]

Originally Posted by trippledx3

So my take on the Jurrasic World 4K disc is that it is WAY better than the BD, i would put the best looking scenes in the same line as Transformers the last knight and almost The Revenant, its amazing. But, a few shots looks like they have DNR, a few shots is veeeery soft, i usuly like grain but there is a few scenes where the grain is a little bit annoying imo, the colours are better than the blu, but not as good as one would expect from a new film with HDR, the colour a bit more muted than i would like it to be, but only a bit. The resolution and detail is superb, especially the second half, BUT it really exposes the CGI at times, makes a couple of the dinosaurs look real fake at times, but all those negatives are just a few scenes. Im no reviewer obviosly, but i would rate this disc 8/10 for detail and resolution

Could you please provide comparison shots?

[Pyoko]

Originally Posted by rashbeep

also how are there still no screens of any of these films lol

Would have posted some screenshots of the first one but the discs are too new, and not yet supported in the usual software.

[RalphoR]

Anyone peek at their JP3 UHD yet? I'm hoping the HDR really jumps out on this one.

[trippledx3]

Originally Posted by Hardback247

Could you please provide comparison shots?

F that, i tried with my phone camera and a another camera and they just dont look like the movie looks, at all, i dont have a proffesional camera

[mzupeman]

I’m rolling the dice on that steelbook Best Buy has. I’m hoping the discs are in an overlapping pattern and not stacked... and if they ARE stacked, I hope the 4K discs will be on the bottom... although I doubt it if that’s the route they have taken.

[trippledx3]

Originally Posted by Hardback247

How did you get it already?

Its not supposed to come out until the 25th here in Norway

[dyne]

Originally Posted by mzupeman

I’m rolling the dice on that steelbook Best Buy has. I’m hoping the discs are in an overlapping pattern and not stacked... and if they ARE stacked, I hope the 4K discs will be on the bottom... although I doubt it if that’s the route they have taken.

I think I will too as I have $25 in rewards credits saved up.

[Pieter V]

Originally Posted by trippledx3

Its not supposed to come out until the 25th here in Norway

Can you please count the inner rings of your disc? It suppose to be BD-66 (2 rings) but you never know. Phantom Thread is another recent example, where it is BD-100.

[Vangeli]

Considering all of the bonus features are included on the UHD disc and they're 1.85-1 and fairly long (except JPIII) I very much hope they're BD-100's.

[Ernest Rister]

Originally Posted by Pyoko

It's not exactly a pristine 4K Sony transfer, but still leagues ahead of the ancient BD. I don't think anyone's going to be disappointed.

I only watch the 3D version included in the Jurassic Park Collection from a couple years back, which, if I'm not mistaken, is a whole different beast in terms of color timing, even including new digital f/x like foreground rain and debris and leaves to push the 3D effect. Looks great, and the new sound mix was a lot of fun.

[trippledx3]

Originally Posted by Pieter V

Can you please count the inner rings of your disc? It suppose to be BD-66 (2 rings) but you never know. Phantom Thread is another recent example, where it is BD-100.

Ima amateur, but yes theres a white ring, then a light blue ring, then a mirror ring, then another mirror ring then a ring with numbers and letters, then a very light blue ring then the disc.... did that answer your question? I could take a photo if thats better? :P

[Pieter V]

Originally Posted by trippledx3

Ima amateur, but yes theres a white ring, then a light blue ring, then a mirror ring, then another mirror ring then a ring with numbers and letters, then a very light blue ring then the disc.... did that answer your question? I could take a photo if thats better? :P

Please take a photo.

[trippledx3]

Originally Posted by Pieter V

Please take a photo.

Haha! I understand, here:

https://imgur.com/a/PApdQ8e

As you see one of the "rings" is not a ring at all, is this even normal or?

had to link it, dont know how to post a picture here, yes im shure im not right in the head :P

[Vangeli]

Looks like a BD-66 to me.

[Pieter V]

Originally Posted by trippledx3

Haha! I understand, here: [IMG]httphttps://imgur.com/a/PApdQ8e[/IMG]

https://imgur.com/a/PApdQ8e

had to link it, dont know how to post a picture here, yes im shure im not right in the head :P

Thanks. BD-66.

[trippledx3]

Originally Posted by Geoff D

I keep forgetting that Jurassic World was shot on film.

Same here, i actually thought something was wrong with the disc when it started playing and i saw the pq because i could swore it was shot digital