|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best 4K Blu-ray Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $22.49 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $16.05 1 day ago
| ![]() $22.49 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.99 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.99 13 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.95 | ![]() $28.99 | ![]() $27.95 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $45.00 | ![]() $27.95 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.99 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#146 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#148 |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#150 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Some interesting comments from cinematographer Paul Cameron:
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | EbonDragon (08-19-2017), Geoff D (08-19-2017), gkolb (08-19-2017), imsounoriginal (08-19-2017), jbragg89 (08-19-2017), legends of beyond (08-19-2017), zmarty (08-21-2017) |
![]() |
#151 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
And that, my friends, is why they need to start just shooting with digital cameras at 4k+ Resolution and mastering at 4k. Hdr makes grain worse so film shot moves can have unintentional grain. Excellent find and that thanks for posting!! |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | zmarty (08-21-2017) |
![]() |
#152 |
Banned
|
![]()
Or, alternatively, the artists can continue shooting on whichever medium they prefer.
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | EbonDragon (08-19-2017), Geoff D (08-19-2017), legends of beyond (08-19-2017), Lt_Cobretti (08-19-2017), Ooze33 (08-23-2017), StingingVelvet (08-20-2017), toasted (08-24-2017) |
![]() |
#153 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Or not. Because as the above director found out, film and hdr do not go that great together. It'll be interesting to see if it changes his mind on shooting with film going forward. There is a REAL issue with film and hdr, if you want to pretend it doesn't exist then that's your own prerogative, but it's 2017 and hdr will only become more of a standard for how movies and TV shows are mastered. Here's another Hollywood colorslist talking about the issues with film and hdr since you want to pretend the issues don't exist. http://www.definitionmagazine.com/jo...-ready-for-hdr |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#154 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | legends of beyond (08-19-2017), toasted (08-24-2017) |
![]() |
#155 | |
Blu-ray Knight
Feb 2012
|
![]() Quote:
If you read the interview, he absolutely was in favor of and glad they shot on film, describing that as a "major plus", so I doubt it will change his mind. Yes, he said the grain was inconsistent with how it registered on the HDR grade, but as he then mentions, it is more about using the appropriate tools to get the look you want. And in this case, film was best for the look the creative team wanted, even if there are drawbacks as with any format, rather than just trying to hit certain tech specs like a 4K DI or HDR (indeed we are seeing some discs release without HDR, and I'm all for directors/cinematographers choosing to pass on HDR if it doesn't match their intended look). |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#159 |
Contributor
|
![]()
It sounds like through their experiments a 4K scan with HDR resulted in what they considered to be a worse transfer than a 2K scan with HDR. Hence what would seem to be a 2K scan with HDR (but maybe with 3K visual effects?) instead of a 4K scan with HDR for the UHD.
Doesn't bother me, as I'm sure it'll look great whatever (and we've seen what fantastic results you can get from other 2K sources and DIs - such as John Wick 2). However, it sounds like they don't like the fact that a 4K scan with HDR exhibits more film grain than they imagined it might. Without seeing what they saw, the comments on grain being an 'issue' sound like a subjective analysis rather than an objective one, but it also sounds like the grain varied between scenes a lot and so they went for the more consistent look of a 2K scan with HDR. Which is fair enough! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#160 | |
Blu-ray Baron
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|