What Display Are You Looking Forward To The Most?

[dereksworl]

Me personally, I can't wait for SED to become mainstream. All the pros of CRT, none of its weaknesses.

Which display are you most anticipating the emergence of?

References:

OLED - Organic Light Emitting Diode is an emissive technology, meaning the
display emits its own light. This exciting technology shows incredible promise. One
advantage is that it will be manufactured by actually printing the display onto a
substrate with a special ink jet printer. This type of manufacturing process will
shrink costs dramatically. OLED has some definite advantages over traditional flat
panel technologies. It feels kind of funny already talking about traditional flat panel
technologies. It just highlights the pace of change in the consumer electronics
industry.


SED - Surface conductor Electron emission Display was engineered jointly by
Cannon and Toshiba. They are putting about $1.8 billion (US) into a new plant
outside Tokyo to produce large, flat panel TVs and monitors using the new
technology. SED is notable because it allows a plasma-like, thin form factor
combined with impressive image quality, akin to a CRT device.

It achieves the impressive picture quality because it uses basically the same
method to create an image as the traditional CRT. Unlike a CRT, however, it uses
no large electron gun. The SED exchanges the CRT's electron gun for a system
whereby the phosphors are stimulated with an individual emitter for each pixel. The
emitters are in very close proximity to the pixel, allowing the display to be very thin,
about 2.5" or so. Like the OLED, it will bring lightning fast response times, avoiding
image artifacts created by slower displays. It has the same dark, inky blacks and
rich colors associated with CRT displays. These image attributes have been missed
by so many video enthusiasts since the decline of the CRT. Like some of the other
new flat panel technologies, the SED has a much lower power consumption than
plasma or LCD, on the order of a 30% - 50% reduction.


FLCD - Ferroelectric Liquid Crystal Display is a relative of the traditional LCD
display that has become ubiquitous in the 32" and under display market. Traditional
LCD displays are usually of the Super Twisted Nematic (STN) variety. The FLCD
was introduced by Thorn EMI in 1992. The intervening years have seen
development solve initial problems with longevity, temperature sensitivity and
vibration sensitivity.

The FLCD is unique compared to the traditional LCD in that it does not need to
have a voltage continuously applied to a pixel in order to keep it off. With an FLCD,
a voltage is only necessary for the initial switching. This leads to a substantial
power savings, on the order of 75%. Another advantage of FLCD is the very rapid
response time, about 1000 times faster than a standard LCD. The rapid response
is essential to eliminating video anomalies when producing fast moving video
images. They have very wide viewing angles as well, which is quite desirable in a
consumer oriented, large screen display.

[Blaumann]

LED DLP front projectors, maybe even in the 4K variety.

I want the quality of a Sony G90 in a digital display.

[dereksworl]

Originally Posted by Blaumann

LED DLP front projectors, maybe even in the 4K variety.

I want the quality of a Sony G90 in a digital display.

I would love to get a Front Project, but i dont have the space or money.

[Chizzap30]

I'm really interested in the Laser tech from Mits. I heard really good things about the rear projections. I just think of the possibilities for front projection.

[[1080-p]]

what i'm not looking for is that dumb new sony tv that shuts itself off if person is sitting still
Sony’s eco-friendly Bravia KDL-46WE5

would perfer provision 3d media

[quexos]

OLED has caught my curiosity. Hope in a few years I'll get such a TV no thicker than half an inch or so.

[Jtodd]

Still enjoying my sammy lcd to much to worry about anything else right now!

[Canada]

Originally Posted by dereksworl

Me personally, I can't wait for SED to become mainstream. All the pros of CRT, none of its weaknesses.

Which display are you most anticipating the emergence of?

References:

OLED - Organic Light Emitting Diode is an emissive technology, meaning the
display emits its own light. This exciting technology shows incredible promise. One
advantage is that it will be manufactured by actually printing the display onto a
substrate with a special ink jet printer. This type of manufacturing process will
shrink costs dramatically. OLED has some definite advantages over traditional flat
panel technologies. It feels kind of funny already talking about traditional flat panel
technologies. It just highlights the pace of change in the consumer electronics
industry.


SED - Surface conductor Electron emission Display was engineered jointly by
Cannon and Toshiba. They are putting about $1.8 billion (US) into a new plant
outside Tokyo to produce large, flat panel TVs and monitors using the new
technology. SED is notable because it allows a plasma-like, thin form factor
combined with impressive image quality, akin to a CRT device.

It achieves the impressive picture quality because it uses basically the same
method to create an image as the traditional CRT. Unlike a CRT, however, it uses
no large electron gun. The SED exchanges the CRT's electron gun for a system
whereby the phosphors are stimulated with an individual emitter for each pixel. The
emitters are in very close proximity to the pixel, allowing the display to be very thin,
about 2.5" or so. Like the OLED, it will bring lightning fast response times, avoiding
image artifacts created by slower displays. It has the same dark, inky blacks and
rich colors associated with CRT displays. These image attributes have been missed
by so many video enthusiasts since the decline of the CRT. Like some of the other
new flat panel technologies, the SED has a much lower power consumption than
plasma or LCD, on the order of a 30% - 50% reduction.

FLCD - Ferroelectric Liquid Crystal Display is a relative of the traditional LCD
display that has become ubiquitous in the 32" and under display market. Traditional
LCD displays are usually of the Super Twisted Nematic (STN) variety. The FLCD
was introduced by Thorn EMI in 1992. The intervening years have seen
development solve initial problems with longevity, temperature sensitivity and
vibration sensitivity.

The FLCD is unique compared to the traditional LCD in that it does not need to
have a voltage continuously applied to a pixel in order to keep it off. With an FLCD,
a voltage is only necessary for the initial switching. This leads to a substantial
power savings, on the order of 75%. Another advantage of FLCD is the very rapid
response time, about 1000 times faster than a standard LCD. The rapid response
is essential to eliminating video anomalies when producing fast moving video
images. They have very wide viewing angles as well, which is quite desirable in a
consumer oriented, large screen display.

I thought that Toshiba canned the SED TV's unfortunatly.

[crazyBLUE]

Originally Posted by Jtodd

Still enjoying my sammy lcd to much to worry about anything else right now!

I will second that ! I agree ~ Well put !!!!!!

[mugupo]

Honogram

[Hale-Bopp]

I'm looking forward to whatever tech handles the new 3-D at home standard the best. Give me a great 3-D experience with high contrast and low response time and I'll be a very happy consumer.