As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
5 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
21 hrs ago
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
21 hrs ago
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.48
1 day ago
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
The Lord of the Rings: Return of the King 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Audio > Receivers
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-09-2009, 04:14 AM   #1
ak_ka ak_ka is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2009
SoCal
34
Default Receiver Suggestion ( < $350 )

Hi Guys,

I was gonna wait for Black Friday to pick up a receiver(my first ), but since I already bought the speakers(couldn't pass up the deal), I need it to hook em up.

I have a budget of around $300-350 at max, since I still need to pick up a sub(which is gonna set me back by another $350).

I've tried to narrow my choice to the following :-

Onkyo HT-RC160
Sony STR-DN1000
Pioneer VSX 919AH-K(though it seems its in huge demand so can't find it under $350 right now)
Harman Kardon AVR-1600

My speakers are Klipsch Quintet SL, rated at 50W. So I don't really need huge power. I want to get the cleanest sound.

Which one do you suggest? I really wanted to go with a Marantz, but with the sub thrown in, and considering I gotta save for a Blu-ray player too, I can't fir it into my budget

Help!!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 05:42 AM   #2
tarletonaggie tarletonaggie is offline
Member
 
tarletonaggie's Avatar
 
Oct 2008
146
Default

I really like my pioneer 919. I got one of the last ones that NewEgg had and IDK when they will get more in but I paid $329 for mine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 06:04 AM   #3
ak_ka ak_ka is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2009
SoCal
34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by tarletonaggie View Post
I really like my pioneer 919. I got one of the last ones that NewEgg had and IDK when they will get more in but I paid $329 for mine.
Yeah, seems like they're out of stock for them. And they'll get more in Nov. Besides, they charge tax for CA
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 07:45 AM   #4
Kryptonic Kryptonic is offline
Suspended
 
Kryptonic's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
45
Default

The Denon AVR590 is an excellent receiver. Usually find it well below $350. It's served me well.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 03:01 PM   #5
ak_ka ak_ka is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2009
SoCal
34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kryptonic View Post
The Denon AVR590 is an excellent receiver. Usually find it well below $350. It's served me well.
The only reason I didn't list Denon is because its 5.1 And I'm pretty sure I'll wanna add a couple of speakers to make my system a 7.1, and thats when I'll have to do the receiver upgrade. Plus, all the others offer 7.1 in this price range, so that ended up being a deal breaker for me
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 03:08 PM   #6
progers13 progers13 is offline
Blu-ray Baron
 
progers13's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
Tampa, FL
83
337
3
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ak_ka View Post
The only reason I didn't list Denon is because its 5.1 And I'm pretty sure I'll wanna add a couple of speakers to make my system a 7.1, and thats when I'll have to do the receiver upgrade. Plus, all the others offer 7.1 in this price range, so that ended up being a deal breaker for me
Glad to see you're thinking ahead. You'll definitely want to keep your options open for expanding to 7.1
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 03:16 PM   #7
bluman007 bluman007 is offline
Active Member
 
Jan 2009
27
11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by progers13 View Post
Glad to see you're thinking ahead. You'll definitely want to keep your options open for expanding to 7.1
if you add $50 to your budget, you can get an onkyo tx-sr607 on ebay. just my 2 cents.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 03:21 PM   #8
ak_ka ak_ka is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2009
SoCal
34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluman007 View Post
if you add $50 to your budget, you can get an onkyo tx-sr607 on ebay. just my 2 cents.
The thing is I can't justify the extra cost for the 607 over the RC160. It has 1 extra HDMI, 90W per channel v/s 80, and has satellite radio support(which I don't use)

Am I missing something important?

PS: This money could cover my cabling cost :P
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 03:34 PM   #9
bluman007 bluman007 is offline
Active Member
 
Jan 2009
27
11
Default

heres the review of Onkyo HT-RC160 on cnet. i guess this receiver is very close to 607 and for less money.

The good:
Solid sound quality; five HDMI inputs; relatively inexpensive; onboard Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio decoding; upconverts analog video signal to 1080i; automatic speaker calibration.

The bad:
Slightly less power than the TX-SR607; no built-in Sirius support; analog video upconversion is poor; no true graphical user interface; no 7.1 analog inputs; big and boxy design; Dolby Pro Logic IIz doesn't have much audible effect.

The bottom line:
The Onkyo HT-RC160 has nearly all the same functionality as the similar TX-SR607, for about $100 less, making it one of the best AV receiver values of the year.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 03:35 PM   #10
callas01 callas01 is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
callas01's Avatar
 
Jun 2008
Riverside, CA
42
230
47
Default

The Sony DN-1000 is the same as my 920, it is actually a very good receiver, when I saw that they listed it at $100 less on the MSRP I was a little surprised, but it looks as if it may be a little beefier then the 920. I push my Energy speakers very well with it so I think of the ones listed that may be the better of them. The Onkyo would be 2nd on my list and then the Harman. The Pioneer 1019/919 are basically the same, and the 1019 reviews were not well. I would steer clear of the new NON-Elite pios at the moment
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 03:50 PM   #11
ak_ka ak_ka is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2009
SoCal
34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluman007 View Post
heres the review of Onkyo HT-RC160 on cnet. i guess this receiver is very close to 607 and for less money.

The good:
Solid sound quality; five HDMI inputs; relatively inexpensive; onboard Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio decoding; upconverts analog video signal to 1080i; automatic speaker calibration.

The bad:
Slightly less power than the TX-SR607; no built-in Sirius support; analog video upconversion is poor; no true graphical user interface; no 7.1 analog inputs; big and boxy design; Dolby Pro Logic IIz doesn't have much audible effect.

The bottom line:
The Onkyo HT-RC160 has nearly all the same functionality as the similar TX-SR607, for about $100 less, making it one of the best AV receiver values of the year.
Yeah, I did read through the CNET reviews. It does seem like a compelling buy. The only problem is that for sound, its rated lower than the other 3 listed. It does have its pluses: 7.2, extra HDMI input.


Quote:
Originally Posted by callas01 View Post
The Sony DN-1000 is the same as my 920, it is actually a very good receiver, when I saw that they listed it at $100 less on the MSRP I was a little surprised, but it looks as if it may be a little beefier then the 920. I push my Energy speakers very well with it so I think of the ones listed that may be the better of them. The Onkyo would be 2nd on my list and then the Harman. The Pioneer 1019/919 are basically the same, and the 1019 reviews were not well. I would steer clear of the new NON-Elite pios at the moment
Well, the reviews I read were that they've actually lowered the quality on the DN-1000 from your 920. The power rating is exaggerated. Though it gets the highest marks for sound quality, a bit of a surprise to me.
Its funny, I started out as a big Sony fanboy when I was a kid, now I'm a bit skeptical bout them :P
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 03:58 PM   #12
callas01 callas01 is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
callas01's Avatar
 
Jun 2008
Riverside, CA
42
230
47
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ak_ka View Post
Well, the reviews I read were that they've actually lowered the quality on the DN-1000 from your 920. The power rating is exaggerated. Though it gets the highest marks for sound quality, a bit of a surprise to me.
Its funny, I started out as a big Sony fanboy when I was a kid, now I'm a bit skeptical bout them :P
Well the power ratings on most of the $500 and below receivers are all exaggerated now-a-days. Look at the Yamaha 665 it runs 42 wpc and listed at 90 wpc, the Pioneer 1019/919 is bench testing at 28 wpc and listed at 120 wpc.

Don't be fooled, they all have suffered power loss and still lay claim to higher output.


https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=104836 Look at post #19 & #24, that is the test results.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 04:01 PM   #13
tootall82103 tootall82103 is offline
Active Member
 
tootall82103's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by callas01 View Post
The Sony DN-1000 is the same as my 920, it is actually a very good receiver, when I saw that they listed it at $100 less on the MSRP I was a little surprised, but it looks as if it may be a little beefier then the 920. I push my Energy speakers very well with it so I think of the ones listed that may be the better of them. The Onkyo would be 2nd on my list and then the Harman. The Pioneer 1019/919 are basically the same, and the 1019 reviews were not well. I would steer clear of the new NON-Elite pios at the moment
I agree. I'd go with the Sony out of the bunch also.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 04:03 PM   #14
ak_ka ak_ka is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2009
SoCal
34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by callas01 View Post
Well the power ratings on most of the $500 and below receivers are all exaggerated now-a-days. Look at the Yamaha 665 it runs 42 wpc and listed at 90 wpc, the Pioneer 1019/919 is bench testing at 28 wpc and listed at 120 wpc.

Don't be fooled, they all have suffered power loss and still lay claim to higher output.


https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=104836 Look at post #19 & #24, that is the test results.
Yeah, I had come across this as well. (donno if me having Klipsch helps it though )
Thats why I was interested in the HK, coz they tend not to exaggerate their ratings, and I really like their Logic 7 processing, at least in my car

My head's already spinning from the confusion
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 04:19 PM   #15
Phatjedi Phatjedi is offline
Active Member
 
Phatjedi's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
Schertz
123
Default

Just sold my Sony 920 for the DN-1000 and I am glad I did. Took 15 minutes to set up, GUI is much better than on the 920. 7.1 never sounded so good.
I have everything running through it (Sony XBR 50, PS3, 360, Laser disc Player and Sony BD S360).
Price was $340.00
Very happy with my purchase.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 04:20 PM   #16
ZIPPO ZIPPO is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
ZIPPO's Avatar
 
May 2008
Columbus, Ohio
148
472
3
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ak_ka View Post
(donno if me having Klipsch helps it though )
Thats why I was interested in the HK, coz they tend not to exaggerate their ratings, and I really like their Logic 7 processing, at least in my car
I vote for the HK. Like Marantz & Denon, HK is very truthful in their power ratings. Here's some feedback on the HK x600 receivers: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1178816
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 04:31 PM   #17
ak_ka ak_ka is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2009
SoCal
34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZIPPO View Post
I vote for the HK. Like Marantz & Denon, HK is very truthful in their power ratings. Here's some feedback on the HK x600 receivers: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1178816
Yeah, the HK does sound tempting.

I know it doesn't upconvert(most upconversions in this range a bad anyway), but does it conver from Analog to Digital, or do I have to run a component cable from the receiver to the TV too?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 04:54 PM   #18
ak_ka ak_ka is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2009
SoCal
34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZIPPO View Post
I vote for the HK. Like Marantz & Denon, HK is very truthful in their power ratings. Here's some feedback on the HK x600 receivers: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=1178816
Quote:
Originally Posted by ak_ka View Post
Yeah, the HK does sound tempting.

I know it doesn't upconvert(most upconversions in this range a bad anyway), but does it conver from Analog to Digital, or do I have to run a component cable from the receiver to the TV too?
Well, I went through that thread, and apparently HK have been misquoting the power rating on the 1600. Its actually 35W per channel. Don't think that'll be enough..
So it seems a straight shootout between the Onkyo and the Sony.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 05:26 PM   #19
ZIPPO ZIPPO is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
ZIPPO's Avatar
 
May 2008
Columbus, Ohio
148
472
3
3
Default

35 watts would be plenty for those speakers. Any of your receiver options would be drive them fairly easy.

from Audioholics.com Quintet SL review
http://www.audioholics.com/reviews/s...sch-quintet-sl

The front three speakers of the Klipsch Quintet SL package are of an MTM "D'Appolito" design with a horn-loaded 3/4 inch aluminum dome tweeter flanked by two 3.5 inch mid-bas drivers. Outside of the woofers are two ports. With the grills on, the three speakers should outline three sides of a flat panel nicely. The rear speakers use the same horn-loaded tweeter and one of the 3.5 inch woofers (these are the same speakers that are included in the Quintet III speaker package). While we have found that orienting the center channel vertically will give you better overall sound quality, we're willing to bet that your better half won't let you. But we suggest you try just in case.

The build quality of these speakers is up to the high standards we've come to expect from Klipsch. The stands once again double for wall mounts which is a nice touch as it negates a potentially expensive add-on that other companies are more than happy to stick you with. The 93db@1watt/1meter for the fronts and 91db@1watt/1meter for the rears sensitivity is crazy high for any speaker much less speakers of this size. There isn't a receiver or amp on the planet that should have a hard time driving these speakers to their limits and beyond.

Last edited by ZIPPO; 10-09-2009 at 05:33 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2009, 06:02 PM   #20
ak_ka ak_ka is offline
Active Member
 
Jun 2009
SoCal
34
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZIPPO View Post
35 watts would be plenty for those speakers. Any of your receiver options would be drive them fairly easy.

from Audioholics.com Quintet SL review
http://www.audioholics.com/reviews/s...sch-quintet-sl

The front three speakers of the Klipsch Quintet SL package are of an MTM "D'Appolito" design with a horn-loaded 3/4 inch aluminum dome tweeter flanked by two 3.5 inch mid-bas drivers. Outside of the woofers are two ports. With the grills on, the three speakers should outline three sides of a flat panel nicely. The rear speakers use the same horn-loaded tweeter and one of the 3.5 inch woofers (these are the same speakers that are included in the Quintet III speaker package). While we have found that orienting the center channel vertically will give you better overall sound quality, we're willing to bet that your better half won't let you. But we suggest you try just in case.

The build quality of these speakers is up to the high standards we've come to expect from Klipsch. The stands once again double for wall mounts which is a nice touch as it negates a potentially expensive add-on that other companies are more than happy to stick you with. The 93db@1watt/1meter for the fronts and 91db@1watt/1meter for the rears sensitivity is crazy high for any speaker much less speakers of this size. There isn't a receiver or amp on the planet that should have a hard time driving these speakers to their limits and beyond.
Aah, guess I am a complete noob I did read that review earlier, but forgot bout the sensitivity. Now I'm eve more confused.

Guess should've opened a poll, coz its hard to keep track of the votes.

So far:-

Sony - +3
HK - +1
Onkyo - +1
Pioneer - +1
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Audio > Receivers

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
New Receiver Suggestion Home Theater General Discussion cathexist 13 01-03-2010 02:24 AM
Need receiver suggestion for ~$350 or so... Receivers seedubxj 24 12-20-2009 10:44 PM
Receiver with Sony BDP-350? Receivers ijokr 6 03-04-2009 09:57 PM
Want a receiver in the $350-$450 range, that utilizes HDMI audio... Receivers Chordata 34 02-20-2009 04:45 PM
Receiver suggestion Receivers SoundFreak 17 09-17-2008 12:39 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:15 AM.