Next Call of Duty detailed.:)

[becomingwater]

http://www.gametrailers.com/news/nex...-detailed/1729

[Scooby Blu]

good find. Time will tell .

[STARSCREAM]

I like the sounds of this one.

[Agent Simth]

I want MW3.

[Mr. J]

Man, a new Call of Duty every year would get old real fast. Not to mention quality starts to diminish when you release a game every year like that. Look at Madden!

[toef]

Even though GameTrailers is a credible site, I don't see what their "source" knows that anyone else couldn't tell you.

If you're interested, here's some info on the next next Call of Duty game (as in, the one after the next one).

-it'll be called Modern Warfare 3
-it will take place in modern day
-it will have guns in it
-it will come out in November 2011

[toef]

Originally Posted by jayvo2008

Man, a new Call of Duty every year would get old real fast. Not to mention quality starts to diminish when you release a game every year like that. Look at Madden!

Well the difference is they have two teams, Treyarch and Infinity Ward.

So there's a new game every year, but two years between games made by the same team.

2007 - Infinity Ward
2008 - Treyarch
2009 - Infinity Ward
2010 - Treyarch
etc.

I think it'd help if Infinity Ward could disassociate itself with the Call of Duty name, and spin that off into it's own thing. I think they're trying, by often referring to the current game as Modern Warfare 2, rather than Call of Duty 6, but I'm sure Activision insists on keeping it within the Call of Duty franchise.

[Mr. J]

Originally Posted by toefer

Well the difference is they have two teams, Treyarch and Infinity Ward.

So there's a new game every year, but two years between games made by the same team.

2007 - Infinity Ward
2008 - Treyarch
2009 - Infinity Ward
2010 - Treyarch
etc.

I think it'd help if Infinity Ward could disassociate itself with the Call of Duty name, and spin that off into it's own thing. I think they're trying, by often referring to the current game as Modern Warfare 2, rather than Call of Duty 6, but I'm sure Activision insists on keeping it within the Call of Duty franchise.

I think thats exactly what they need to do! Get rid of Call of Duty and just name it Modern Warfare!

[DJ Manyak]

99% of cod multiplayer is full of hackers i would rather play battlefield

[Simplayer]

Originally Posted by toefer

I think it'd help if Infinity Ward could disassociate itself with the Call of Duty name, and spin that off into it's own thing. I think they're trying, by often referring to the current game as Modern Warfare 2, rather than Call of Duty 6, but I'm sure Activision insists on keeping it within the Call of Duty franchise.

Sounds like they're trying to make an MMO of sorts. Maybe...

[ScarredLungs]

Originally Posted by jayvo2008

Man, a new Call of Duty every year would get old real fast. Not to mention quality starts to diminish when you release a game every year like that. Look at Madden!

I agree. These are coming out way to fast.

[209Mason]

I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I'm gonna throw this out there:

I enjoyed the crap out of Modern Warfare 1. That was one of the best single player experiences ever (next to Portal) for how short it was. However, I REALLY miss Infinity Ward's work on COD1 and COD2. Those are classics... call me crazy, but I still play COD2 multiplayer more than MW.

I wish IW would jump back into the 'traditional' COD and give us something like Vietnam or Korean War (or heaven forbid WWII) with the polished graphics/storytelling they've been churning out in Modern Warfare.... Sorry to Treyarch, but World at War just didn't do it for me.

Just kinda sucks because IW is making money hand over fist on Modern Warfare, so I'm sure they'll stick in the present... I just wish they'd jump back into what started it all sometime.

[supersix4]

I just cant stand driving vehicles ever since the demo of world at war where I went like 31-1 in that tank I said this isn't for me. Hopefully they have enough diversity in guns and attachments exc. for me to buy this.

[toef]

Originally Posted by 209Mason

I'm sure I'm in the minority, but I'm gonna throw this out there:

I enjoyed the crap out of Modern Warfare 1. That was one of the best single player experiences ever (next to Portal) for how short it was. However, I REALLY miss Infinity Ward's work on COD1 and COD2. Those are classics... call me crazy, but I still play COD2 multiplayer more than MW.

I wish IW would jump back into the 'traditional' COD and give us something like Vietnam or Korean War (or heaven forbid WWII) with the polished graphics/storytelling they've been churning out in Modern Warfare.... Sorry to Treyarch, but World at War just didn't do it for me.

Just kinda sucks because IW is making money hand over fist on Modern Warfare, so I'm sure they'll stick in the present... I just wish they'd jump back into what started it all sometime.

I used to think a Civil War game would be fun, because the setting interests me, but then I realized how bad it'd be as an FPS. Horribly inaccurate guns, with terribly slow loading times. Maybe a killstreak would be a cannon strike, where some CPU teammates will roll out a cannon, and launch a ball wherever you want.

[supersix4]

Originally Posted by toefer

Maybe a killstreak would be a cannon strike, where some CPU teammates will roll out a cannon, and launch a ball wherever you want.

where did you come up with that

[Mr. J]

Originally Posted by supersix4

where did you come up with that

Thats actually a good idea!

[BluHavik]

Originally Posted by toefer

I used to think a Civil War game would be fun, because the setting interests me, but then I realized how bad it'd be as an FPS. Horribly inaccurate guns, with terribly slow loading times. Maybe a killstreak would be a cannon strike, where some CPU teammates will roll out a cannon, and launch a ball wherever you want.

Nah, we want Modern Warfare, you know where we run around with dual shotguns and handgun knife attachments. We will settle for no less then realistic.

[Wingman1977]

Originally Posted by computergeek

99% of cod multiplayer is full of hackers i would rather play battlefield

Dumb comment. Now, if you said that 99% of COD mutilplayer is full of campers, snipe*****s, noobtubers, and akibo *****s (dual shotguns), that would have made more sense.

[Terjyn]

Originally Posted by toefer

I think it'd help if Infinity Ward could disassociate itself with the Call of Duty name, and spin that off into it's own thing. I think they're trying, by often referring to the current game as Modern Warfare 2, rather than Call of Duty 6, but I'm sure Activision insists on keeping it within the Call of Duty franchise.

Since Call of Duty is Infinity Ward's baby, I'd say kick Treyarch off the name.

I say this primarily because IW shouldn't be locked into "Modern Warfare", which they are if you keep that name.

[Darkhawk9587]

Originally Posted by becomingwater

http://www.gametrailers.com/news/nex...-detailed/1729

Vietnam could be interesting, though I doubt I'll pick it up since it'll be an almost carbon copy of MW with a different setting.

Originally Posted by Agent Simth

I want MW3.

You'll have to wait until November of 2011. Plus, Infinity Ward might not even make the game.

Source: http://www.gamespot.com/news/6245073...dlines;title;6