Ah ha! Proof I wasn't as nuts as you all thought I was!

[AlexKx]

Now I swear. Proof that I wasn't freakin' nuts after all. You folks totally SLAMMED me for being off my rocker and flat on the floor when I found out over the last couple of months that Blu-Ray discs were being used for a TOTALLY different reason than what I understood that they were going to be used for after YEARS of waiting for it to be released since the year 2001 or so.

http://www.howstuffworks.com/framed....gy/3696306.stm

Now again. I TOTALLY think Blu-Ray's capacity should be used for High Definition before getting more hours onto one layer of a disc but it certainly IS different from what I understood it was going to be used for for a LONG time until the last couple of months according to this article if I am understanding it right. Am I not? I just didn't understand the facts of High Definition and that a clear cut one way decision was made for the entire industry. Again I think that the decision is the right one but am I still to understand that the storage space should be able to be increased more and more to hold more hours on one layer like it was originally thought it would?