|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $35.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $33.49 17 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $34.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $11.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.33 | ![]() $35.99 15 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Dec 2006
|
![]()
The event of the last week brought about the true colors of HD-DuDers fanbois. During the war, all of them claimed to be HD-enthusiasts, die hard HD who can't wait to early adopt future techs, pro-consumers, blah, blah, blah...
Now we can tell who is who...... 1. The true HD enthusiasts are the ones saying, 'HD-DVD is dead, let's support BD' to fight SD and downloads 2. Pro-Microsofts are the ones saying, 'Digital Download is DA FUTURE!!! 3. Anti-Sonys are the ones saying, 'I ain't supporting BD, I'm going back to SD-DVD' 4. Dumb anti-consumers are the ones saying, 'The war ain't over, HD-DVD can still win this war' |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() Quote:
Feel sorry for #4, they're the ones who'll be getting burned the worst by this format war. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Active Member
Oct 2007
|
![]()
Can't agree with #2.Lost of ppl agree with this, lots who'v never heard of ms.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I count myself under #1
Blu-Ray is the future. Now let's kill downloads and SD! Seriously I've had Blu-Ray for enough time to have known it was going to be the winner of this thing. If you get an HD DVD supporter to actually SEE the difference. It's no contest. Blu-Ray is superior. An HD enthusiast simply HAS to admit that. Everyone else is just deluding themselves. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Dec 2006
|
![]()
In Hidef Digest, I still see a few of #4
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Member
Oct 2007
Tampa, FL
|
![]()
I'm admittedly someone who leaned towards HD DVD, mainly because I enjoy interactivity and PiP commentaries and such. Despite this, even before the WB rumors started I had more Blu-rays than HD DVDs, and now that the PS3 is Profile 1.1 compliant, you could say that I'm almost fully Blu (the little red part will exist until Uni and Paramount switch, as I enjoy quite a few movies from those two studios). So that in that sense, I'm definitely a fan of high-def optical media over the other solutions (SD, downloads), it's just my status as a broke college student prevents me from supporting it even more
![]() I can say this though: before the WB announcement, AVS never really bothered me, and I wondered why everyone on here had so much hatred for that place. After trying to read through that place for a couple days after the announcement though, I fully understand where the hatred comes from now. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Senior Member
Dec 2006
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Dec 2007
|
![]()
You hit the nail on the head. That is an excellent summary. Nice to see a couple of no 1s here.
BTW im new to all HD stuff, but the vitreol that is spouted off in HDD and AVS forum is unbelievable. They give fanboyism a bad name! Last edited by tuku; 01-09-2008 at 11:15 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I still want hi-def downloads to (eventually) prevail over physical media. But not until it is (a) on-demand for any movie, sporting event, TV show or trailer I want, whenever I want, (b) cheaper than buying the physical media, (c) completely lossless audio and video quality, (d) downloads only take minutes, not hours or days, and (e) a simple server storage solution that allows me to hold nearly unlimited downloads and share them across my home theater, laptop, iPod, car, etc.
Basically, I want Star Trek IRL. Until that happens, I'm Blu. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
The #1's I applaud for because that is exactly what I would be doing if Blu-ray had lost. The #3's I think I would call them the "sore loosers". If they can't have HD their way, then it's "no way". The #4's should be called the "ignorants". They aren't looking at the big picture of where high-def media needs to go to survive. Now some of the #3's are being confused with #2's (properly labeled IMO). The true #2's are Microsoft mouthpieces. The #3's that have slipped into this category are not willing to give up on high-def entirely, just high-def media. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I love the #4 people... Why the crap would you want a format that only 2 studios will be releasing titles for? It makes no sense at all! Even if HD DVD magically survives with these 2 studios, they'd have to keep up enough releases each week to warrant the formats existance which isn't going to happen. It's actually almost impossible...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Nov 2007
|
![]()
Actually I see more HD-DVD fanboys crying that the consumers lost because HD-DVD lost. Obviously because a technologically inferior product is $100 bucks cheaper and was pronounced dead over a year ago makes it the "consumer friendly" format, right? By their logic, yes, absolutely.
But I definitely don't understand why they are crying other than the fact they wasted AT LEAST a few hundred bucks on something now obsolete. Given their mindset honestly don't expect any of them to acceptingly convert to Blu, and nobody else should either. Besides, they aren't our problem now. The new battle is helping the BDA meet their billion disc forecast and help spur the transition from DVD. HD-DVD is no longer on the same playing field as Blu-Ray, and has officially gone off to its own sector of the market -- commonly referred to as the garage sale market. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
2. LOL Yeah thats right download and waste your disc-space on films. 3. Thats just sad. 4. LOL This sort needs to wake up. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Expert Member
Jul 2007
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Active Member
|
![]()
To be honest, I can understand the desire for downloads. I have an appleTV, and have been encoding my dvd collection and storing them on an external drive. Sure, it takes up loads of space, but having everything right there at your fingertips is a major convenience that can't be denied. Especially when you start to get a massive collection (I have almost 1000 dvd/BD discs) having a place to put them and make them still accessible (not to mention keeping them in alphabetical order when you have children in the house) becomes a majors issue. So, I can understand the desire for downloads and digital storage. Heck, the process of ripping dvds to my computer and playing them on the aTV seems to upconvert the video very nicely. Though I do lose out a bit on the audio side, as the mp4 codec (which is all an unhacked aTV) can support) is only capable of dobly prologic at best. but removing an entire wall of dvds and replacing it with a single external hard drive is a storage solution that can not be scoffed at. However for digital downloads to work, they really need to have better bandwidth and at least 1080i resolution, and an easy way to store data that does not rely on a home pc.
Edit: One thing that pisses me off to no end is why studios continue to release discs with cases that are 3-4 times larger than they need to be to store and protect the disc. My collection could easily take up 1/3 the space if all the cases where as thin as they could and -should- be. They should all be the size of a standard cd case with half or 1/3 the width is all that is truly needed for storage and adequate protection. sure make them a bit thicker if you want to include a booklet or something. but many of the movies i buy today have nearly empty cases wasting massive amounts of space. Last edited by Arr MiHardies; 01-10-2008 at 12:49 AM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
HD DVD fanbois latest terrorist group!!!zomg1one! | General Chat | kalkin84 | 0 | 06-02-2008 05:25 PM |
Question: Is it true that HD-DVD is not 1080p? | Newbie Discussion | Skygod | 14 | 01-08-2008 09:10 PM |
Not sure if old new or new...Image of True Warner DVD | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | scorpionkingct | 3 | 12-21-2007 06:39 PM |
Hidefdigest Shows Their True Colors Again | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | E-Dogg | 42 | 12-18-2007 10:29 PM |
HighDefDigest Showing Their True Colors Again... | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | E-Dogg | 17 | 10-29-2007 08:31 PM |
|
|