|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $29.99 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 12 hrs ago
| ![]() $13.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $34.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $10.99 3 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
Dec 2008
|
![]()
OK, I know this is discussed all of the time, but I'm hoping to get an answer specific to my current setup.
I recently bought a PS3 so I can start future-proofing and enjoying Blu-ray, but my HDTV is a couple of years old (Sony KDF-50E2000) and isn't exactly up to today's HD standards. I've played around with the settings on the PS3 and TV to the point where I'm happy with the picture, but I'm not sure whether to set the PS3 to output at 720p or 1080i (the PS3 "auto sets" itself at 1080i through the HDMI). I thought the 1080i picture looked really good, and couldn't see an immediate difference switching to 720p, but I'm now finding out that my TV failed the "deinterlace test," which makes me wonder if I'm only seeing 1080i as better because of the larger number (placebo effect). I need to know if it's best to output from PS3 at 1080i and let the TV downscale to 768, potentially losing resolution (despite me being unable to notice easily) or to output from PS3 at 720p and let the TV upscale to 768. I'd like to know which will give me the better overall PQ, as well as which method is making my system do unnecessary work (if either). Sorry for the long post... I'm just really interested in hearing an answer other than "whatever looks best to you." My own perception is not satisfying me at this point. EDIT: If it makes a difference, I will be using the PS3 for Blu-ray and DVD about 90% of the time, so any difference pertaining to videogames is not really an issue. Last edited by dwesson; 12-31-2008 at 06:41 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Active Member
Dec 2008
|
![]() Quote:
My concern, I guess, is over the fact that since my TV "fails the deinterlace test", I felt that maybe I was only getting the 540p because of the TVs inability to adapt to the interlaced signal... but if that were true, wouldn't I notice all sorts of lines and jaggies, especially during "action" scenes? I've tried a whole bunch of different stuff as reference, and it all looks great on my TV... clear as can be. I just want to make sure I'm not forcing my TV to do anything it doesn't need to be doing, or physically can't do. But since most of you agree that it looks the same or better using 1080i regardless, I'm just going to leave it at that and enjoy it until I can upgrade to 1080p. Thanks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Yeah, there probably won't be much difference. ESPN uses 720p for HD broadcasting because of the fast motion sports where 720p is more stable, but most other networks use 1080i for shows/movies etc. But if your TV isn't de-interlacing properly, that would definitely be noticable on a standalone BD player. I'm just not sure about PS3s, though. As long as your TV de-interlaces properly, there is no difference between 1080i and 1080p TVs with a standalone BD player, for instance.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Active Member
Dec 2008
|
![]()
Yeah, even though I'm being told that my TV doesn't deinterlace properly (nothing I have seen with my own eyes backs that statement up) I will probably continue using it set at 1080i until I notice some sort of distortion with the picture. I have been told that Sony sets are usually pretty solid with scaling, which may account for why I don't see a difference.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Active Member
Dec 2008
|
![]()
I'm not 100% positive, but I've been doing a lot of research and it seems that a lot of HDTVs that are not "Full HD" (1080p) can still accept 1080i and/or 1080p signals. Only, instead of displaying the picture at that quality, which would be impossible, seeing as how the TV only has 720 or 768 lines of resolution, the TV scales the image to a resolution it can display.
So, it all comes down to what resolutions your TV will accept, and whether or not it looks better downscaling a 1080 signal, or upscaling a lower signal. I've been told the best option is to always feed the TV it's native resolution, but I swear 1080i looks nicer on my set. Either that or I'm just happier thinking it does. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Junior Member
|
![]()
i have the same tv.. running to a sony bdps350 blu-player.. i am very impressed with this tv.. ive seen many other 720p(lcd.plasma..crt) i still think the grand wega beats them. i am running in 1080i. Dark Knight and cars/wall-e.. looked amazing. at this stage i dont see a need for a 1080P tv.
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
1080i | Home Theater General Discussion | samdaman94 | 9 | 09-22-2009 02:25 AM |
1080i | Display Theory and Discussion | spudd4242 | 12 | 01-27-2009 05:36 PM |
What is 1080i? | Display Theory and Discussion | The Lion King | 41 | 05-19-2008 09:50 AM |
1080i | Newbie Discussion | AZULEJO | 19 | 03-25-2008 04:05 PM |
1080i is all I can get | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | haas | 8 | 08-10-2007 02:49 PM |
|
|