As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
1 day ago
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
18 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
1 day ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
 
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
1 day ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
 
Jurassic World: Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
Lawrence of Arabia 4K (Blu-ray)
$30.49
 
Spotlight 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
1 day ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Movies
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-06-2009, 05:11 PM   #1
J_UNTITLED J_UNTITLED is offline
Power Member
 
Jul 2006
Default "Shazam!" Officially Dead

From JohnAugust.com...


Quote:
"Before the holidays, I promised a post-mortem on Shazam!, the big-screen adaptation of the DC comic I’ve been working on since early 2007. In case you’re not familiar with the character, here’s what I wrote when I first announced the project:

Captain Marvel is a superhero roughly as powerful as Superman, minus the heat-vision and cold breath. What’s unique about the character is that in ordinary life, he’s teenager Billy Batson. Speaking the name of the wizard who gave him his powers (Shazam) calls down a magic thunderbolt, transforming him into the studly superhero. But he’s still a teenager in there.

If this to you sounds, “Like Big, but with superpowers,” then congratulations! You now understand Hollywood.

So that you may further understand Hollywood, let me briefly fill you in on what’s happened in the meantime.

I wrote a draft for New Line. Around the time I turned it in, there was a lot of speculation about whether New Line would continue to remain in business, but there was enough enthusiasm that the mini-studio ran the numbers and considered going into production before a potential actors’ strike. (The WGA strike hadn’t yet happened, but it looked inevitable.) Director Pete Segal was busy on Get Smart, costarring Dwayne Johnson, and rumors began building that The Rock would play Black Adam. A lot of people liked that idea, me included.

I would describe this draft as a comedy with a lot of action. It mostly centers on Billy Batson getting and learning how to use his powers, and discovering what happened to his parents that left him an orphan. One of the appeals of the project is that Billy is a comic book hero who actually reads comic books. Black Adam ultimately becomes the adversary, but he works much like Voldemort in the Harry Potter movies — a dark force to battle at the end, not a constant presence throughout. I wrote the draft I had pitched, and was very happy with how it turned out.

I got notes from New Line and the producers — mostly about set pieces, and keeping Black Adam from becoming too sympathetic — but before I could get started, the WGA went on strike. I couldn’t write, nor did I talk to anyone involved for 100 days.

When the strike was over, Shazam! was suddenly a Warner Bros. movie.1 The new executive at Warners said he agreed with the New Line notes, and told the producers I should go ahead with my rewrite. We weren’t on the official production schedule, but there were discussions about budgets and timelines. We were definitely Pete Segal’s next movie, and many of the stories coming out of the press junkets for Get Smart were about Shazam.

When we turned the new draft in to the studio, we got a reaction that made me wonder if anyone at Warners had actually read previous drafts or the associated notes. The studio felt the movie played too young. They wanted edgier. They wanted Billy to be older. They wanted Black Adam to appear much earlier.

(I pointed out that Black Adam appears on page one, but never got a response.)

I expressed my frustration that I’d wasted months of my time and a considerable amount of the studio’s money on things that should have been discussed at the outset. I asked for a meeting with the executive in charge. He and I had one phone call, then I got a new set of notes that didn’t gibe with what we had discussed. (The written studio notes, I will say, were well-considered. I disagreed with the direction they were taking the movie, but they were thorough and self-consistent.)

In retrospect, I can point to two summer Warner Bros. movies that I believe defined the real issue at hand: Speed Racer and The Dark Knight. The first flopped; the second triumphed. Given only those two examples, one can understand why a studio might wish for their movies to be more like the latter. But to do so ignores the success of Iron Man, which spent most of its running time as a comedic origin story, and the even more pertinent example of WB’s own Harry Potter series. I tried to make this case, to no avail.

I was under contract to deliver one more draft. So I took them at their (written) word and delivered what they said they wanted: a much harder movie, with a lot more Black Adam. This wasn’t “Big, with super powers” anymore. It was Black Adam versus Captain Marvel, with a considerable push into dark territory and liminal badlands like Nanda Parbat. It wasn’t the action-comedy I’d signed on to write, but it was a movie I could envision getting made. The producer and director liked it, and turned it in to the studio while I was in France.

By the time I got back, the project was dead.

By “dead,” I mean that it won’t be happening. I don’t think it’s on the studio’s radar at all. It may come back in another incarnation, with another writer, but I can say with considerable certainty that it won’t be the version I developed.2

Yes, that sucks. And obviously, I can only share my interpretation of what transpired. There were dozens of meetings and phone calls in which I had no participation. As a reader, you should certainly consider the possibility that I wrote shitty scripts they simply didn’t want to make. Because Warners controls copyright on them, I can’t put them in the Library for you to read yourself. So you have to decide whether to take my word on it.

The larger point of this retelling is to help readers understand that at every level in a screenwriter’s career, there are projects that simply don’t happen, mostly for reasons you couldn’t anticipate at the outset. I’ve had good experiences at Warner Bros. (Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, Corpse Bride) and bad experiences (Tarzan, Barbarella). My next movie is at that studio, so while I’m frustrated by the way they handled this project, I have no axe to grind. When they have a movie they want and support, they’re top-notch.

I got paid well to write Shazam, and I get to keep that money. The real cost is an opportunity cost — the other projects I could have written that might be in production now. More than anything, that’s one of the reasons production rewrites are so appealing to established writers: you know those movies are going to get made.

Also softening the blow is that I’m already writing a new project, one I might have had to pass up if Shazam had dragged on any further. The first half of 2009 is going to be very busy. So while I’ll miss Shazam, and the movie it could have been, I won’t feel too bad if this is the last post I ever write about it.

1. Warners has a relationship with DC Comics that goes beyond the corporate kinship with New Line, so they apparently could have gotten involved even if New Line had remained separate.


2. Keep in mind that press releases often have little relationship to reality. The same week I found out that Shazam! was dead, Variety and several online news outlets ran stories about Pete Segal’s new overall deal with Warners, which highlighted Shazam! as his next project. I got several “Congratulations!” emails."
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:13 PM   #2
lobo81865 lobo81865 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
lobo81865's Avatar
 
Aug 2008
1
562
3659
3338
1323
3018
1551
950
1
102
Default

That sucks. I love Captain Marvel, and have the expensive DC Archive edition books of the character. I have fond memories of the 70's (albeit cheesy) Saturday morning show.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:15 PM   #3
Batman00 Batman00 is offline
Special Member
 
Batman00's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
116
22
1
Default

Its not dead, just HIS version of this script is, they will make it, just with a more serious script
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:17 PM   #4
lobo81865 lobo81865 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
lobo81865's Avatar
 
Aug 2008
1
562
3659
3338
1323
3018
1551
950
1
102
Default

Ah, yeah I just caught that at the last part of the post. Come to think of it, I wouldn't want it to be too humorous. The inclusion of Black Adam would be cool.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:25 PM   #5
Beast Beast is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Beast's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
376
3
Send a message via AIM to Beast
Default

Shocking. Showing again that Warner Bros. doesn't understand it's comics arm.

This is why Marvel is kicking their ass in both comics and film.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:26 PM   #6
J_UNTITLED J_UNTITLED is offline
Power Member
 
Jul 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lobo81865 View Post
Come to think of it, I wouldn't want it to be too humorous.

If the original comic series was fairly comedic or light in tone, why shouldn't the film be?
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:26 PM   #7
P@t_Mtl P@t_Mtl is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
P@t_Mtl's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Montreal
4
452
513
3
Send a message via Yahoo to P@t_Mtl
Default

I sure hope they end up making this movie sometime soon. I have fond memories of the Saturday TV show from the 70's.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:27 PM   #8
Beast Beast is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Beast's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
376
3
Send a message via AIM to Beast
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by P@t_Mtl View Post
I sure hope they end up making this movie sometime soon. I have fond memories of the Saturday TV show from the 70's.
If they do make it, they'll want it like Dark Knight. Which shows they don't get the property.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:28 PM   #9
J_UNTITLED J_UNTITLED is offline
Power Member
 
Jul 2006
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by P@t_Mtl View Post
I sure hope they end up making this movie sometime soon.

Well, considering it is apparently not even in active development anymore I doubt it will be anytime that soon unless a new writer or director comes to them with a take they get juiced on (i.e. see dollar signs).
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:29 PM   #10
P@t_Mtl P@t_Mtl is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
P@t_Mtl's Avatar
 
Sep 2008
Montreal
4
452
513
3
Send a message via Yahoo to P@t_Mtl
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beast View Post
If they do make it, they'll want it like Dark Knight. Which shows they don't get the property.
Probably you are quite right. Would make no sense to turn it into a Dark Knight type of movie, characters are so completly different.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 05:33 PM   #11
Beast Beast is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Beast's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
376
3
Send a message via AIM to Beast
Default

This is the whole reason why Time Warner owning DC Comics sucks.

DC has no say in how these movies are made. And all WB sees is Dark Knight's Dollar Signs.

That's what's killed almost every movie that has been slated for development.

It's lame how WB will put these films into production, just to prevent them from being made by someone else.

That clause of WB having first option rights to every DC film just has killed the chance of seeing anything featuring a DC character outside of Batman and Superman. Just look at the track record so far. Cause they will never pass on a film, simply put them into pre-production and eventually kill them.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2009, 09:52 PM   #12
Clark Kent Clark Kent is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Clark Kent's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Metropolis
2
184
Default

The writer seems very honest and forthright about the whole process. My guess is that New Line was serious about making the movie and Warner had little intention of ever developing this script it inherited. Warner executives are intently focused on the bottomline of every movie and how it can be turned into a franchise and a possible summer blockbuster. This section,

When we turned the new draft in to the studio, we got a reaction that made me wonder if anyone at Warners had actually read previous drafts or the associated notes. The studio felt the movie played too young. They wanted edgier. They wanted Billy to be older. They wanted Black Adam to appear much earlier.

tells me they were looking for the movie to spark a franchise with hopes of hitting box office gold by selling it to the older teen audience.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Movies

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
has "The Batman Anthology" been officially confirmed? Blu-ray Movies - North America FUBARFilms 5 08-04-2008 07:16 PM
Plot Revealed for "Dead of Night" ("Dylan Dog") Movies J_UNTITLED 0 07-16-2008 08:06 AM
UK gets "Kill Bill" 1&2, "Pulp Fiction", "Beowulf", "Jesse James", and more in March? Blu-ray Movies - North America JBlacklow 21 12-07-2007 11:05 AM
"Halloween", "Dawn of the Dead" and "Day of the Dead" on October 2nd Blu-ray Movies - North America J_UNTITLED 5 08-19-2007 03:29 AM
Ultimate AV Mag says "DVD is officially legacy video" General Chat zombie 2 09-16-2006 07:17 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:40 AM.