
Did you know that Blu-ray.com also is available for United Kingdom? Simply select the

|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Did you know that Blu-ray.com also is available for United Kingdom? Simply select the ![]() |
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $24.96 14 hrs ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $31.13 | ![]() $20.07 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $19.99 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $34.99 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $99.99 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $27.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $29.99 1 day ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Mar 2009
Toronto
|
![]()
I don't understand the big draw to TVs displaying 120Hz or higher. I gues 60 Hz is/was the standard, right? When I switch from 60 to 120, the picture/motion just looks weird. Like a home movie or cartoon. Is this the intent? Keeping it at 60 Hz seems to keep the movie looking like a "Hollywood" movie. Is it just me, or what?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Member
|
![]()
What your seeing is not 120hz but motion interpolation. 120hz is just the refresh rate. What gives it that soap opera feel is something seperate. For example, some TV's like Samsung call it motion flow I believe. Lets take a regular film thats being put through at 1080p/24. Normally, at 120 Hz with no motion interpolation, it will refresh it 5 times.
xxxxx where x is qual to each frame repeated 5 times (120/24 = 5) Motion interpolation inputs extra frames that "guess" where the next frame will be using complex algorithms in between each frame giving you xoxoxoxoxo where x = original, o = interpolated Thus results in the soap opera feel you get. Some people like it, some don't. Its all personal preference but motion interpolation does not give you the original picture. hopefully this helps. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Last edited by dereksworl; 04-06-2009 at 06:28 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Member
Mar 2009
Toronto
|
![]()
I just don't get the point of 120Hz/240Hz if its better to just turn it OFF during regular viewing.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
![]() It all depends on the source and how it was intending to be viewed. The motion enhancer settings from low to high provide interpolation (adds missing frames to give it a smoother look) for fast moving scenes, which some complain about gives it the look of a "soap opera effect", especially with movies. I think the motion enhancer or motionflow works very well with sports and even with most PIXAR or cartoon material. But ultimately, it is up to the viewer. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I only use my Sony XBR4 LCD for BDs and DVDs. The distortion that results from the interpolation along with that unreal-feel, cause me to leave the Motion Enhancer off all the time.
The exception is Baraka. For whatever reason there is minimal distortion with the Motion Enhancer set to high and it gives a "hyper-real" effect to the movie. If you have Baraka, give it a try. It is very cool. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I have, and it worked well most times. I am really fussy about any artifacts, smearing or blurring, so if I see more than a bit, OFF goes ME. On Planet Earth, I notice the artifacts around fast moving objects, say like a wolf trying to catch a baby caribou.
Baraka surprises me, because there is often a lot of movement, but few artifacts and smearing. I wonder if the 8K mastering and/or high bitrate have anything to do with it. I tried putting ME on for the IMAX scenes in The Dark Knight, but I had to turn it off right away because it looked so "off"... Perhaps the type of content featured in Planet Earth or Baraka (i.e. nature) lend themselves to ME. ![]() Last edited by BluCheez; 04-08-2009 at 03:18 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Moderator
|
![]()
I had the same issue with artifacts and I had to turn it off as well. Once you notice them, it seems like you see them in every scene thereafter.
Last edited by Fors*; 04-08-2009 at 12:03 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
Cheers! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
120hz vs 240hz....any real noticable difference? | Display Theory and Discussion | Steelmaker | 9 | 09-02-2009 02:56 AM |
DTS MA-HD: What's the big deal? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Maxell | 71 | 03-23-2008 12:29 AM |
what's the big deal with DTS-HD MA??? L-PCM is the way to go... | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | jon s | 24 | 02-27-2008 01:02 AM |
This may not be a big deal but.... | Blu-ray Movies - North America | dogger114 | 7 | 11-08-2007 02:24 AM |
Whats the big deal... with firmware? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Moefiz | 23 | 10-21-2007 10:32 AM |
|
|