As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×


Did you know that Blu-ray.com also is available for United Kingdom? Simply select the flag icon to the right of the quick search at the top-middle. [hide this message]

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
14 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
The Creator 4K (Blu-ray)
$20.07
4 hrs ago
How to Train Your Dragon (Blu-ray)
$19.99
7 hrs ago
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
 
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
16 hrs ago
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
1 day ago
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Displays > Display Theory and Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-05-2009, 12:44 AM   #1
link_of_hyrule link_of_hyrule is offline
Member
 
link_of_hyrule's Avatar
 
Mar 2009
Toronto
Default 120Hz, 240Hz - what's the big deal??

I don't understand the big draw to TVs displaying 120Hz or higher. I gues 60 Hz is/was the standard, right? When I switch from 60 to 120, the picture/motion just looks weird. Like a home movie or cartoon. Is this the intent? Keeping it at 60 Hz seems to keep the movie looking like a "Hollywood" movie. Is it just me, or what?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2009, 12:58 AM   #2
LoveHomeTheatre LoveHomeTheatre is offline
Member
 
Sep 2008
45
Default

What your seeing is not 120hz but motion interpolation. 120hz is just the refresh rate. What gives it that soap opera feel is something seperate. For example, some TV's like Samsung call it motion flow I believe. Lets take a regular film thats being put through at 1080p/24. Normally, at 120 Hz with no motion interpolation, it will refresh it 5 times.

xxxxx

where x is qual to each frame repeated 5 times (120/24 = 5)

Motion interpolation inputs extra frames that "guess" where the next frame will be using complex algorithms in between each frame giving you

xoxoxoxoxo where x = original, o = interpolated

Thus results in the soap opera feel you get. Some people like it, some don't. Its all personal preference but motion interpolation does not give you the original picture. hopefully this helps.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2009, 01:18 AM   #3
dgator783 dgator783 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
dgator783's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
Lakeland,FL
377
1521
11
14
Send a message via AIM to dgator783
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by link_of_hyrule View Post
I don't understand the big draw to TVs displaying 120Hz or higher. I gues 60 Hz is/was the standard, right? When I switch from 60 to 120, the picture/motion just looks weird. Like a home movie or cartoon. Is this the intent? Keeping it at 60 Hz seems to keep the movie looking like a "Hollywood" movie. Is it just me, or what?
it helps if u watch alot of sports or action-fast moving films
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2009, 02:56 PM   #4
Clark Kent Clark Kent is offline
Blu-ray Prince
 
Clark Kent's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Metropolis
2
184
Default

Many people find that it looks weird for material shot on film but some like how it makes live-action video look like sporting events.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2009, 03:21 PM   #5
Sonny Sonny is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Sonny's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
8
6
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveHomeTheatre View Post
What your seeing is not 120hz but motion interpolation. 120hz is just the refresh rate. What gives it that soap opera feel is something seperate. For example, some TV's like Samsung call it motion flow I believe. Lets take a regular film thats being put through at 1080p/24. Normally, at 120 Hz with no motion interpolation, it will refresh it 5 times.

xxxxx

where x is qual to each frame repeated 5 times (120/24 = 5)

Motion interpolation inputs extra frames that "guess" where the next frame will be using complex algorithms in between each frame giving you

xoxoxoxoxo where x = original, o = interpolated

Thus results in the soap opera feel you get. Some I like it, some don't. Its all personal preference but motion interpolation does not give you the original picture. hopefully this helps.
+1 that's what's going on, you have motion interpolation on. That's the "HD Video look" you get , that most don't like. 120Hz does help & 240Hz should help just a bit more as far as MR goes, hopefully?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 01:37 PM   #6
Fors* Fors* is offline
Moderator
 
Fors*'s Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Pottstown, PA
160
12
142
11
Default

I do not think you will "see" that much of a difference with 240hz set. What LCD's really need to improve upon are their response times being below 4ms...just my opinion.....
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 01:46 PM   #7
Erman_94 Erman_94 is offline
Power Member
 
Jan 2008
Canada
31
201
Default

can this motion interpolation be turned off?

and will most models have this in the future? i dont like it
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 01:58 PM   #8
dereksworl dereksworl is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
dereksworl's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Around
18
1
USA

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erman_94 View Post
can this motion interpolation be turned off?

and will most models have this in the future? i dont like it
Yes the frame interpolation can be turned off. it can also be set to low, medium, or high on most newer Gen displays. "Off" is usually the way to go when watching blus, except Transformers. then it's Low

Last edited by dereksworl; 04-06-2009 at 06:28 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 11:26 PM   #9
link_of_hyrule link_of_hyrule is offline
Member
 
link_of_hyrule's Avatar
 
Mar 2009
Toronto
Default

I just don't get the point of 120Hz/240Hz if its better to just turn it OFF during regular viewing.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2009, 11:36 PM   #10
Fors* Fors* is offline
Moderator
 
Fors*'s Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Pottstown, PA
160
12
142
11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by link_of_hyrule View Post
I just don't get the point of 120Hz/240Hz if its better to just turn it OFF during regular viewing.
I don't want to upset anyone, so what I think you meant to say was to turn off the "motion enhancer" or "motionflow" as you can't "turn off" a TV with 120 hz. Lets not any more than we have been.

It all depends on the source and how it was intending to be viewed. The motion enhancer settings from low to high provide interpolation (adds missing frames to give it a smoother look) for fast moving scenes, which some complain about gives it the look of a "soap opera effect", especially with movies. I think the motion enhancer or motionflow works very well with sports and even with most PIXAR or cartoon material. But ultimately, it is up to the viewer.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 12:05 AM   #11
starkent08 starkent08 is offline
Senior Member
 
Mar 2009
870
16
Default

how bout those avs lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 12:29 PM   #12
dereksworl dereksworl is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
dereksworl's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Around
18
1
USA

Quote:
Originally Posted by link_of_hyrule View Post
I just don't get the point of 120Hz/240Hz if its better to just turn it OFF during regular viewing.
As Forsberg already said, you cannot turn off the 120Hz. what you are turning off is the "motion enhancement." 120Hz purpose is to reduce motion blur and to properly display 24p source material. and yes once again>
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 01:13 PM   #13
Got2LoveGadgets Got2LoveGadgets is offline
Active Member
 
Got2LoveGadgets's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
UK
8
100
4
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveHomeTheatre View Post
What your seeing is not 120hz but motion interpolation. 120hz is just the refresh rate. What gives it that soap opera feel is something seperate. For example, some TV's like Samsung call it motion flow I believe. Lets take a regular film thats being put through at 1080p/24. Normally, at 120 Hz with no motion interpolation, it will refresh it 5 times.

xxxxx

where x is qual to each frame repeated 5 times (120/24 = 5)

Motion interpolation inputs extra frames that "guess" where the next frame will be using complex algorithms in between each frame giving you

xoxoxoxoxo where x = original, o = interpolated

Thus results in the soap opera feel you get. Some people like it, some don't. Its all personal preference but motion interpolation does not give you the original picture. hopefully this helps.
This is an extremely good explanation of what is happening. Refresh rates are going to be the new buzz words in the same was as 720p and 1080p are now. Refresh rates are going to be very important when 3D finally gets released to the consumer market, home displays will have to run at a very minimum of 120hz and then multiples of this 240hz ect. So we will soon see stickers stuck on LCD's that say 1080p 120hz 3d ready (or something similar)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 03:01 PM   #14
BluCheez BluCheez is offline
Senior Member
 
BluCheez's Avatar
 
Aug 2008
Winnipeg, Canada
12
80
18
Default Baraka with Motion Flow at High

I only use my Sony XBR4 LCD for BDs and DVDs. The distortion that results from the interpolation along with that unreal-feel, cause me to leave the Motion Enhancer off all the time.

The exception is Baraka. For whatever reason there is minimal distortion with the Motion Enhancer set to high and it gives a "hyper-real" effect to the movie. If you have Baraka, give it a try. It is very cool.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 03:08 PM   #15
Fors* Fors* is offline
Moderator
 
Fors*'s Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Pottstown, PA
160
12
142
11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluCheez View Post
I only use my Sony XBR4 LCD for BDs and DVDs. The distortion that results from the interpolation along with that unreal-feel, cause me to leave the Motion Enhancer off all the time.

The exception is Baraka. For whatever reason there is minimal distortion with the Motion Enhancer set to high and it gives a "hyper-real" effect to the movie. If you have Baraka, give it a try. It is very cool.
I usualy have mine off too, except for certain programing. I do however like the option to turn it off or not in those instances where I can turn it on to add to my viewing experience (i.e sports (especially hockey) and cartoons.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2009, 03:22 PM   #16
Monkey Monkey is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Monkey's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
31
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluCheez View Post
I only use my Sony XBR4 LCD for BDs and DVDs. The distortion that results from the interpolation along with that unreal-feel, cause me to leave the Motion Enhancer off all the time.

The exception is Baraka. For whatever reason there is minimal distortion with the Motion Enhancer set to high and it gives a "hyper-real" effect to the movie. If you have Baraka, give it a try. It is very cool.
Try Planet Earth as well
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 03:15 AM   #17
BluCheez BluCheez is offline
Senior Member
 
BluCheez's Avatar
 
Aug 2008
Winnipeg, Canada
12
80
18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkey View Post
Try Planet Earth as well
I have, and it worked well most times. I am really fussy about any artifacts, smearing or blurring, so if I see more than a bit, OFF goes ME. On Planet Earth, I notice the artifacts around fast moving objects, say like a wolf trying to catch a baby caribou.

Baraka surprises me, because there is often a lot of movement, but few artifacts and smearing. I wonder if the 8K mastering and/or high bitrate have anything to do with it.

I tried putting ME on for the IMAX scenes in The Dark Knight, but I had to turn it off right away because it looked so "off"... Perhaps the type of content featured in Planet Earth or Baraka (i.e. nature) lend themselves to ME.

Last edited by BluCheez; 04-08-2009 at 03:18 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 11:50 AM   #18
Fors* Fors* is offline
Moderator
 
Fors*'s Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Pottstown, PA
160
12
142
11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluCheez View Post

I tried putting ME on for the IMAX scenes in The Dark Knight, but I had to turn it off right away because it looked so "off"... Perhaps the type of content featured in Planet Earth or Baraka (i.e. nature) lend themselves to ME.
I had the same issue with artifacts and I had to turn it off as well. Once you notice them, it seems like you see them in every scene thereafter.

Last edited by Fors*; 04-08-2009 at 12:03 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 08:17 PM   #19
BluCheez BluCheez is offline
Senior Member
 
BluCheez's Avatar
 
Aug 2008
Winnipeg, Canada
12
80
18
Default The joys of fussiness!

Quote:
Originally Posted by forsberg21 View Post
I had the same issue with artifacts and I had to turn it off as well. Once you notice them, it seems like you see them in every scene thereafter.
I find that the more I learn about TV calibration and the more I tweak, the less I am willing to put up with. When I first got my TV the attitude was, "If they have all these advanced features it would be a waste not to use them." However, I've learned that more is not always better. Two quick examples:
  1. Detail and Edge Enhancement: both of these settings may cause the picture to "pop", but they also cause artifacts. Look at the chain link fence on the Dark Knight when Alfred drives his car to the underground bunker after finding Bruce absent from his penthouse. With DE and EE on the fence with shimmer and distort. I though this was normal until I started tweaking. Turn them off and it looks normal, the way it should.
  2. Backlight: some feel that brighter will result in a more vibrant picture. At first I was surprised when someone suggested that the best contrast is obtained with the Backlight at minimum. I tried it just yesterday, and after recallibrating my blacks and whites (with my AVS disc) I am amazed at how great it looks. Look at the black leather jacket of Spooner in i Robot when he first talks to "the richest man in the world" (forgot his name). I also noticed that with the backlight at minimum the noise is reduced.
Ahhh, the joys of being fussy. I am just amazed at how often people will put up with a terrible looking picture because they are intimidated by the settings or couldn't be bothered.

Cheers!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 08:26 PM   #20
Fors* Fors* is offline
Moderator
 
Fors*'s Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Pottstown, PA
160
12
142
11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BluCheez View Post
I find that the more I learn about TV calibration and the more I tweak, the less I am willing to put up with. When I first got my TV the attitude was, "If they have all these advanced features it would be a waste not to use them." However, I've learned that more is not always better. Two quick examples:
  1. Detail and Edge Enhancement: both of these settings may cause the picture to "pop", but they also cause artifacts. Look at the chain link fence on the Dark Knight when Alfred drives his car to the underground bunker after finding Bruce absent from his penthouse. With DE and EE on the fence with shimmer and distort. I though this was normal until I started tweaking. Turn them off and it looks normal, the way it should.
  2. Backlight: some feel that brighter will result in a more vibrant picture. At first I was surprised when someone suggested that the best contrast is obtained with the Backlight at minimum. I tried it just yesterday, and after recallibrating my blacks and whites (with my AVS disc) I am amazed at how great it looks. Look at the black leather jacket of Spooner in i Robot when he first talks to "the richest man in the world" (forgot his name). I also noticed that with the backlight at minimum the noise is reduced.
Ahhh, the joys of being fussy. I am just amazed at how often people will put up with a terrible looking picture because they are intimidated by the settings or couldn't be bothered.

Cheers!
I agree whole heartedly agree. I always keep the enhancements off and I have my backlight at around 2 or 3 and use Movie mode on my Sammy. My wife thought it looked way to dark when I did it, but now that it has been a few months, she doesn't even notice how "dark" it is, but I always make sure to point out the blacks whenever I can.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Displays > Display Theory and Discussion

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
120hz vs 240hz....any real noticable difference? Display Theory and Discussion Steelmaker 9 09-02-2009 02:56 AM
DTS MA-HD: What's the big deal? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Maxell 71 03-23-2008 12:29 AM
what's the big deal with DTS-HD MA??? L-PCM is the way to go... Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology jon s 24 02-27-2008 01:02 AM
This may not be a big deal but.... Blu-ray Movies - North America dogger114 7 11-08-2007 02:24 AM
Whats the big deal... with firmware? Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Moefiz 23 10-21-2007 10:32 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:34 PM.