As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
A Better Tomorrow Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$82.99
9 hrs ago
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
 
Corpse Bride 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.94
2 hrs ago
Longlegs 4K (Blu-ray)
$23.60
2 hrs ago
Shudder: A Decade of Fearless Horror (Blu-ray)
$101.99
1 day ago
The Dark Half 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.68
2 hrs ago
Congo 4K (Blu-ray)
$28.10
3 hrs ago
The Bad Guys 2 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.54
5 hrs ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$48.44
3 hrs ago
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
 
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$39.02
8 hrs ago
Sexomania / Lady Desire (Blu-ray)
$19.12
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


View Poll Results: Which version of Star Wars Blu-ray will you be purchasing (or not)?
The Complete Star Wars Saga 1,335 72.48%
The Prequel Box Set 20 1.09%
The Original Trilogy Box Set 110 5.97%
Not Purchasing Star Wars Blu-ray 377 20.47%
Voters: 1842. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-19-2015, 08:19 AM   #57221
tskwerl tskwerl is offline
Active Member
 
tskwerl's Avatar
 
May 2015
8
299
258
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StingingVelvet View Post
Okay so after not liking Star Wars or Empire Strikes Back my wife reluctantly watched Return of the Jedi tonight to be caught up for the new movie and... she liked it a lot. She teared up when Anakin's ghost appeared (even though she never saw the prequels). She said "I guess I'm a Star Wars fan now."

Explain that one.
One of us! One of us!

It's interesting how adamant some people can be about not wanting to watch a science fiction film or a Star Wars film, but if they open their minds just for a little bit, can end up enjoying themselves. Good on her.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
StingingVelvet (12-19-2015)
Old 12-19-2015, 08:22 AM   #57222
Falaskan Falaskan is offline
Banned
 
Mar 2011
Alaska
274
60
1
44
Default

That's why I've always liked ROTJ. Besides Ian McDiamond, the movie pulls the biggest emotional punch of the trilogy
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 03:17 PM   #57223
oldgame oldgame is offline
Senior Member
 
oldgame's Avatar
 
May 2009
46
11
Default

Just watched the trilogy on laserdisc. The originals not the thx discs. It was great to hear the stereo tracks, and see artifacs. It was like watching film again.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 03:18 PM   #57224
Geoff D Geoff D is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

I loves them PCM tracks on the THX laserdiscs. Loveliness.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 04:27 PM   #57225
Jonkai Jonkai is offline
Active Member
 
Dec 2013
147
Default

So a few questions: 1. Does the new Complete Saga set include either digital copy or DVDs? 2. Is there a difference between the complete saga and the two trilogy sets? 3. Do the two trilogy sets still come with DVDs or digital copies?
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 04:31 PM   #57226
jdw89 jdw89 is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
jdw89's Avatar
 
Jun 2013
Oklahoma
92
1052
206
106
159
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonkai View Post
So a few questions: 1. Does the new Complete Saga set include either digital copy or DVDs? 2. Is there a difference between the complete saga and the two trilogy sets? 3. Do the two trilogy sets still come with DVDs or digital copies?
1. No, and no
2. The difference are the 3 bonus disc's that are only found in the complete saga
3. The trilogy sets come with DVDs, no digital copies though.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Jonkai (12-19-2015)
Old 12-19-2015, 04:46 PM   #57227
ZoetMB ZoetMB is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
May 2009
New York
172
27
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimSmith View Post
If only the original trilogy was released unaltered on Blu-ray then there wouldn't be a need for anything "illegal" as far as these films are concerned! Lots of activities are illegal and that just shows that some laws are just downright stupid!!
While copyright and especially patent laws certainly need revising for the modern age, I'd like to know what bothers you about the concept that an artist or content owner has the exclusive rights to a work and no one else has the rights to that work within the term of the copyright.

One can fault Congress for constantly extending the copyright term (largely at the urging of Disney, by the way, who used the incredible rationale that if Mickey Mouse went into the public domain, people could make pornographic cartoons with Mickey Mouse with the implication that children would see them), but the fact remains that if I create something and copyright it, you don't have the right to do anything with it other than to purchase or rent it for non-commercial viewing with the exception of some limited uses for educational fair use, criticism and satire. And that's as it should be. Just because you want something that the artist/owner isn't giving you doesn't give you the right to steal the work. Grow up.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
JackKnightStarman (12-19-2015), Riddell (12-28-2015)
Old 12-19-2015, 05:08 PM   #57228
Alan_Grant Alan_Grant is offline
Special Member
 
Alan_Grant's Avatar
 
Apr 2013
46
125
Default

I really wish the UOT would be released. As of now, I don't own a single one of these films. I'd love too though.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 05:15 PM   #57229
ZoetMB ZoetMB is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
May 2009
New York
172
27
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kaiju View Post
I would agree with you, but unfortunately, you're wrong.

Vader shouting "NOOOOOO!!!" as he chucks Emperor Palpy completely ruins the scene for me.
Only because you know it wasn't there originally. But if you didn't know that, it wouldn't bother you at all or at least no more than any other of the many instances of trite dialogue in these films. And I'm going to contend that most of the complaints either come from people who never saw the originals or who did see them, but couldn't possibly remember anything but the major changes (although the "NOOOOOO" would be one of them).

Somewhere on the web is this frame-by-frame analysis of the changes, and (without going back and counting), probably 80% were to fix garbage mattes and multi-generation dissolves, 15% were to add objects such as additional fighters, lifeforms and buildings to scenes and only 5% were the stupid changes that he shouldn't have made, but I really think people overreact to, even though some of the criticisms are valid (like showing Hayden Christensen at the end of ROTJ, which would have only made sense if Luke had known what he looked like).

Furthermore, even though fanboys are clamoring for the unaltered originals, my prediction is that if they were released by themselves, they would not sell that well, because the general public really doesn't give a crap either way and those who have bought on BD are not going to double-dip for the OT again. Giving those versions to the streaming services might generate some extra revenue as some people who had never seen the OT in its unaltered form might be curious enough to pay $6 to see what the fuss is about, but getting consumers to lay down another $60 to get the trilogy again - I don't see anyone but the fanboys doing that.

Once people did view the UOT again, I predict a lot of "that's what all the fuss was about?" along with a bunch of "I like the special editions better". They'll certainly be some people who will be excited and claim the unaltered editions are superior, but most of those people have decided that in advance.

And let's not forget that especially with Episode IV, there were three different audio versions of that film: the 70mm 6-track mix, the 35mm Dolby Optical 4-track mix and the 35mm mono mix. It's not just a matter that some sounds got buried or were more distinctive in the different mixes, there were actually slight dialog and SFX changes. Some sources claim Lucas thought the mono mix was the "real" mix. I, for one, see the 70mm 6-track mix as "canon" as that's how the film was released in the most important theaters. But if they were to release a new BD in mono or in stereo but with mono surround, as the 70mm was, the same fans who only want the film unaltered would freak out. So there's also a bit of hypocrisy.

The reaction would be similar to what's happening now with VII. There are certainly people who love the new film but there's also some backlash as I've been predicting for a long time: people claiming that Lucas would have handled the story better and that the new story is just a
[Show spoiler]rehash of Episode IV and that J.J. is a hack.
So in spite of the apparent incredible success of the new film, we might see Lucas looked upon favorably again for a time.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Panama Jack (12-19-2015)
Old 12-19-2015, 05:16 PM   #57230
stvn1974 stvn1974 is online now
Blu-ray Prince
 
stvn1974's Avatar
 
Jan 2012
Earth
18
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldgame View Post
Just watched the trilogy on laserdisc. The originals not the thx discs. It was great to hear the stereo tracks, and see artifacs. It was like watching film again.
I watched the OT so many times as a kid on VHS and in 4:3 that I decided to put them on the other day. Took me back but I am glad to have the DS versions as my go to now.

I love how defensive some people get when other point out how much they hate the changes made to the films. It has already started with The Force Awakens, those same prequel/Lucas lovers are giving it 1 out of 5 and probably had their negative reviews written before the movie started.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 05:35 PM   #57231
Mavrick Mavrick is offline
Gaming Moderator
 
Mavrick's Avatar
 
Dec 2008
Wales
121
62
813
1
5
1
Default

Wasn't the NOOOOOOOO added to Jedi because every other film has a "NOOOOOOOOO" except for Jedi? Guess they wanted some consistency.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 05:38 PM   #57232
Geoff D Geoff D is online now
Blu-ray Emperor
 
Geoff D's Avatar
 
Feb 2009
Swanage, Engerland
1348
2525
6
33
Default

The 'NOOOOoooOOOOOOooowwww' was added to ROTJ because Lucas is a pillock.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 05:42 PM   #57233
stvn1974 stvn1974 is online now
Blu-ray Prince
 
stvn1974's Avatar
 
Jan 2012
Earth
18
Default

I am convinced that Lucas knew how much people hated the "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" in Sith and decided to add it to Jedi as a last middle finger to fans.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
FilmFreakosaurus (12-19-2015)
Old 12-19-2015, 05:42 PM   #57234
Falaskan Falaskan is offline
Banned
 
Mar 2011
Alaska
274
60
1
44
Default

The first short no I actually like, but was unneeded. The second was bad but not the worst change to the OT. Adding Hayden as a force ghost is the one change I will never be able to adapt to, personally.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
Mandalorian (12-19-2015)
Old 12-19-2015, 05:45 PM   #57235
stvn1974 stvn1974 is online now
Blu-ray Prince
 
stvn1974's Avatar
 
Jan 2012
Earth
18
Default

"No, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" ruined Jedi.

Hayden at the end ruined the entire saga.


I can't watch the current Lucas version of Star Wars, the prequels are crimes against cinema and the changes to the original trilogy makes me not want to watch them. For me it is going to be the UOT and the new films. Hopefully we don't get anything that links to the prequels that can't be ignored.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
FilmFreakosaurus (12-19-2015), marcbird91 (12-19-2015)
Old 12-19-2015, 05:54 PM   #57236
crissrudd4554 crissrudd4554 is online now
Blu-ray Samurai
 
crissrudd4554's Avatar
 
May 2013
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoetMB View Post
Only because you know it wasn't there originally. But if you didn't know that, it wouldn't bother you at all or at least no more than any other of the many instances of trite dialogue in these films. And I'm going to contend that most of the complaints either come from people who never saw the originals or who did see them, but couldn't possibly remember anything but the major changes (although the "NOOOOOO" would be one of them).

Somewhere on the web is this frame-by-frame analysis of the changes, and (without going back and counting), probably 80% were to fix garbage mattes and multi-generation dissolves, 15% were to add objects such as additional fighters, lifeforms and buildings to scenes and only 5% were the stupid changes that he shouldn't have made, but I really think people overreact to, even though some of the criticisms are valid (like showing Hayden Christensen at the end of ROTJ, which would have only made sense if Luke had known what he looked like).

Furthermore, even though fanboys are clamoring for the unaltered originals, my prediction is that if they were released by themselves, they would not sell that well, because the general public really doesn't give a crap either way and those who have bought on BD are not going to double-dip for the OT again. Giving those versions to the streaming services might generate some extra revenue as some people who had never seen the OT in its unaltered form might be curious enough to pay $6 to see what the fuss is about, but getting consumers to lay down another $60 to get the trilogy again - I don't see anyone but the fanboys doing that.

Once people did view the UOT again, I predict a lot of "that's what all the fuss was about?" along with a bunch of "I like the special editions better". They'll certainly be some people who will be excited and claim the unaltered editions are superior, but most of those people have decided that in advance.

And let's not forget that especially with Episode IV, there were three different audio versions of that film: the 70mm 6-track mix, the 35mm Dolby Optical 4-track mix and the 35mm mono mix. It's not just a matter that some sounds got buried or were more distinctive in the different mixes, there were actually slight dialog and SFX changes. Some sources claim Lucas thought the mono mix was the "real" mix. I, for one, see the 70mm 6-track mix as "canon" as that's how the film was released in the most important theaters. But if they were to release a new BD in mono or in stereo but with mono surround, as the 70mm was, the same fans who only want the film unaltered would freak out. So there's also a bit of hypocrisy.

The reaction would be similar to what's happening now with VII. There are certainly people who love the new film but there's also some backlash as I've been predicting for a long time: people claiming that Lucas would have handled the story better and that the new story is just a
[Show spoiler]rehash of Episode IV and that J.J. is a hack.
So in spite of the apparent incredible success of the new film, we might see Lucas looked upon favorably again for a time.
Just release the two together and there is no issue. If the originals were remastered and released theyd sell like hot cakes. The only ones who wouldnt is fans a) who dont like the originals b) dont wanna buy the Special Editions again c) all the above. You obviously fall into those categories. People can like the Special Editions but theres a very large fanbase who loves the originals and would most likely buy the SE's again if the originals were included. The only reason the 2006 DVDs flopped, if i can say that, is because fans knew in advance that no effort was made to remaster the films. We were given cheap 4:3 Laserdiscs tranfers which was nothing new to fans who either had those Laserdiscs or cheap DVD-R'd versions of the Laserdiscs. But there is still a market for them and there always will be. Sites like originaltrilogy.com probably wouldnt exist if there wasnt such a huge demand for the old cuts. And as far as new fans not liking the new prints, well theyre the same people who will dislike black and white films simply cause its black and white or say the shark in Jaws looks fake. Everyone is critical to a degree of old stuff but the reality is the SE's of SW are not representational of the era they were created. If u dont like it dont watch it but have respesct or those who will watch it.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
JackKnightStarman (12-19-2015)
Old 12-19-2015, 06:09 PM   #57237
Falaskan Falaskan is offline
Banned
 
Mar 2011
Alaska
274
60
1
44
Default Star Wars: The Complete Saga, Original & Prequel Trilogy - Sept 16, 2011 - Re...

They'll maximize sales by releasing the UOT once on its own, once with the SE, once with the PT, once with both the PT and SE, once with the ST, and at least once as part of the entire saga collection. Disney isn't dumb lol
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 06:33 PM   #57238
rickah88 rickah88 is offline
Blu-ray Grand Duke
 
rickah88's Avatar
 
May 2010
Columbia, MD
-
-
-
93
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZoetMB View Post
Only because you know it wasn't there originally. But if you didn't know that, it wouldn't bother you at all or at least no more than any other of the many instances of trite dialogue in these films. And I'm going to contend that most of the complaints either come from people who never saw the originals or who did see them, but couldn't possibly remember anything but the major changes (although the "NOOOOOO" would be one of them).

Somewhere on the web is this frame-by-frame analysis of the changes, and (without going back and counting), probably 80% were to fix garbage mattes and multi-generation dissolves, 15% were to add objects such as additional fighters, lifeforms and buildings to scenes and only 5% were the stupid changes that he shouldn't have made, but I really think people overreact to, even though some of the criticisms are valid (like showing Hayden Christensen at the end of ROTJ, which would have only made sense if Luke had known what he looked like).

Furthermore, even though fanboys are clamoring for the unaltered originals, my prediction is that if they were released by themselves, they would not sell that well, because the general public really doesn't give a crap either way and those who have bought on BD are not going to double-dip for the OT again. Giving those versions to the streaming services might generate some extra revenue as some people who had never seen the OT in its unaltered form might be curious enough to pay $6 to see what the fuss is about, but getting consumers to lay down another $60 to get the trilogy again - I don't see anyone but the fanboys doing that.

Once people did view the UOT again, I predict a lot of "that's what all the fuss was about?" along with a bunch of "I like the special editions better". They'll certainly be some people who will be excited and claim the unaltered editions are superior, but most of those people have decided that in advance.

And let's not forget that especially with Episode IV, there were three different audio versions of that film: the 70mm 6-track mix, the 35mm Dolby Optical 4-track mix and the 35mm mono mix. It's not just a matter that some sounds got buried or were more distinctive in the different mixes, there were actually slight dialog and SFX changes. Some sources claim Lucas thought the mono mix was the "real" mix. I, for one, see the 70mm 6-track mix as "canon" as that's how the film was released in the most important theaters. But if they were to release a new BD in mono or in stereo but with mono surround, as the 70mm was, the same fans who only want the film unaltered would freak out. So there's also a bit of hypocrisy.

The reaction would be similar to what's happening now with VII. There are certainly people who love the new film but there's also some backlash as I've been predicting for a long time: people claiming that Lucas would have handled the story better and that the new story is just a
[Show spoiler]rehash of Episode IV and that J.J. is a hack.
So in spite of the apparent incredible success of the new film, we might see Lucas looked upon favorably again for a time.
Excellent post! I agree 100%

I can save you some time: some people will find fault in anything.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 06:37 PM   #57239
stvn1974 stvn1974 is online now
Blu-ray Prince
 
stvn1974's Avatar
 
Jan 2012
Earth
18
Default

People would have hated the "No, NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" if it was originally in Jedi just as much as they do the "NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO" in Sith. But keep on telling yourself differently.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2015, 07:56 PM   #57240
StingingVelvet StingingVelvet is offline
Blu-ray Grand Duke
 
StingingVelvet's Avatar
 
Jan 2014
Philadelphia, PA
851
2331
111
12
69
Default

The idea that no one would really care if the OT theatricals were released with a new 4k scan is so laughable. I know some people love posting stuff like "shut up complainers!" in every thread, but when you act like the holy grail of the biggest franchise on the planet wouldn't sell enough to bother with, you make yourself look so silly.
  Reply With Quote
Thanks given by:
dallywhitty (12-19-2015), dvdmike (12-19-2015), FilmFreakosaurus (12-19-2015), Geoff D (12-19-2015), HeavyHitter (12-19-2015), svenge (12-19-2015), The Fallen Deity (12-20-2015)
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Star Trek box set 1-10 Blu-ray Movies - International koontz1973 13 03-03-2015 12:52 PM
New STAR WARS box set (on DVD only) General Chat Blu-Ron 40 08-03-2011 03:47 PM
Any Idea when all 6 Star Wars will be released? Possibly 2011 Blu-ray Movies - North America devils_syndicate 445 08-15-2010 11:52 AM
Star Wars (BD Movies) Release Planned for 2011 Blu-ray Movies - North America kemcha 5 04-25-2010 03:29 AM
Star Wars CLONE WARS Blu-Ray Exclusive 2 Disc GIFT SET + Comic Book Blu-ray Movies - North America little flower 10 11-11-2009 10:35 PM

Tags
ford, george, lucas, star wars, vader


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:50 AM.