Another proof/sign 30GB just aint enough !!!

[MrVorhees]

"Artifacting in Troy: Director's Cut"

and 7 Mbps scenes





Source: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=911235

WHY ?? Because spacelimits of hd dvds 30gb? Could SONY or Disney have done this better?

[spam.curitiba]

Originally Posted by GSX600F

"Artifacting in Troy: Director's Cut"

and 7 Mbps scenes





Source: http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=911235

WHY ?? Because spacelimits of hd dvds 30gb? Could SONY or Disney have done this better?

you do know that is on a blu-ray player....

[reiella]

Originally Posted by spam.curitiba

you do know that is on a blu-ray player....

Of a movie, encoded to the lowest common denominator the HD-DVD 30gb specifications.

[MrVorhees]

Originally Posted by reiella

Of a movie, encoded to the lowest common denominator the HD-DVD 30gb specifications.

exactly! if you consider troy has a runtime of 196min and max. space 30GB.
HOW can it be possible to make a videocodec with average high bitrates like Pirates or Casino Royale ect. ?

i cant imagine how this could work, maybe someone here will explain this to me!

[spam.curitiba]

Originally Posted by GSX600F

exactly! if you consider troy has a runtime of 196min and max. space 30GB.
HOW can it be possible to make a videocodec with average high bitrates like Pirates or Casino Royale ect. ?

i cant imagine how this could work, maybe someone here will explain this to me!

what WB needs to do instead of putting the same thing on both hd dvd and blu-ray is make two different versions...I think that would help them see which one is better

[TauRus]

Yes, and the display seems to be very uncalibrated too

[MrVorhees]

Originally Posted by spam.curitiba

you do know that is on a blu-ray player....

you do know that has nothing to do with the blu-ray player? Do you think the bitrates a higher on a HD DVD player??????????????? its the exact same codec! DONT BLAME BLU-RAY!!! its senseless in this case!

[spam.curitiba]

Originally Posted by GSX600F

you do know that has nothing to do with the blu-ray player? Do you think the bitrates a higher on a HD DVD player??????????????? its the exact same codec! DONT BLAME BLU-RAY!!! its senseless in this case!

I am just saying it was on a blu-ray player....thats all...I didn't say it was up to the specs that blu-ray can do...Do you know how to read?

[MrVorhees]

Originally Posted by spam.curitiba

I am just saying it was on a blu-ray player....thats all...I didn't say it was up to the specs that blu-ray can do...Do you know how to read?

LOL and what did you wanted to tell us with that??? feel free to tell us what you have eaten at breakfast today as well.

[spam.curitiba]

Originally Posted by GSX600F

LOL and what did you wanted to tell us with that??? feel free to tell us what you have eaten today at breakfast as well.

holy shit...no reason to go ape shit dude.....I was just pointing out that it was a blu-ray disc as the poster made no mention of it being on a blu-ray disc. He made it sound from the title of his post it was a hd dvd.

I never said that it was blu-ray specs having this problem as you are trying to make it seem like...

[scott1256ca]

what is it we are supposed to be seeing? The shots look blown out and whoever took the pictures didn't have a steady enough hand. Is that supposed to be macroblocking in the background of the first shot? I have no idea what the problem is supposed to be with the second, because of the unsteady hand.