|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $86.13 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $49.99 19 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.96 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $34.96 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $14.44 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.99 | ![]() $80.68 | ![]() $36.69 1 day ago
| ![]() $122.99 58 min ago
| ![]() $19.99 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $20.97 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $72.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
I won't be able to make my contributions until I get home tonight, but here is what I want us to do. This running comparison will tell us if new firmware is actually improving all the load times or not. I know in the case of 3.80 a few loaded faster, and a few loaded slower.
Grab all your BD-J movies and time how long they take to load with 3.80, or what ever lower firmware you may have. Most digital watches have a stop watch to use. Time movie load times with 3.80 and record them on paper. Upgrade your Sony BDP-S30x player to the 3.90 firmware and record that as well. If you already have 3.90. just report those numbers. Just round results to the nearest second. Timing MUST begin from the moment the door clips shut and stop at the first image on the screen. If the movie is a title that plays previews first and then loads the movie, press "top menu" immediately to bypass the previews. This will add an extra second or two due to your response time, but you get the idea. I think we will all be within 1 or 2 seconds of each other. With 3.80 Fantastic Four: RotSS is the longest loading BD-J disc I know of at 1:50. If that load time improves, I presume most others will load faster. Let's get cracking people! ![]() Edit 9/2: Here is my suggested "Load Time Performance Table". Consider 90 seconds and under as the tolerable sweet spot. * Non BD-J loading in 35 seconds or less. Excellent. * BD-J up to 75 seconds. Very Good. * BD-J 76 to 90 seconds. Good. (Tolerable Threshold) * BD-J 91 to 100 seconds. Very Fair * BD-J 101 to 120 seconds. Fair. * BD-J over 120 seconds. Poor. * BD-J over 180 seconds. Very Poor. Last edited by tron3; 09-02-2008 at 01:55 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
And the results are in. It appears that 3.90 is another mixed lot. Some load times are down to the snappier 3.70 numbers. But others, including non-BD-J are UP, or about unchanged.
Menus do seem to be more responsive than ever. But don't expect miracles. So far it really is a toss up as to where you see the improvement. Title 3.70 / 3.80 / 3.90 / 4.20 ========================= Cold start: 0.44 / 0.44 / 0.44 / .44 Fantastic 4: 0.23 / 0.23 / 0.26 / 0.24 Fantastic 4: RotSS 1.50 / 2.03 / 2.05 / 1.34 Pirates of the Carribbean 1: 1:40 / 1:36 / 1:13 / 1.11 Pirates of the Carribbean 2: 1.12 / 1.31 / 1.09 / 1.04 Pirates of the Carribbean 3: 1.18 / 1.22 / 1.03 / 1.00 Spider-Man 1: 1.35 / 1.16 / 1.12 / 1.08 Spider-Man 2: 1.13 / 1.15 / 1.18 / 1.11 Spider-Man 3: 1.24 / 1.22 / 1.24 / 1.17 Only 3.90 known ============= Cars 2.02 Chicken Little (non BD-J) 0.36 Corpse Bride (non BD-J) 0.24 Meet the Robinsons (non BD-J) 0.36 Open Season (non BD-J) 0.26 4.20 ====== CARS 1.43 Last edited by tron3; 08-29-2008 at 02:11 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Active Member
May 2007
Chicago suburbs
|
![]()
It may appear that you are talking to yourself on this thread, but I for one appreciate your extensive testing of the FW versions. I would not have the patience for this.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
![]() I enjoy doing it because I love seeing how my player has improved with new firmware. It's good to know for a fact the machine became better, and not just assume or "I think it loaded faster" as is the case with most members. It is like having a new machine a year after I bought it. ![]() Plus consider after 3.70 the workmanship in the firmware became shoddy. It was hit and miss. Some movies loaded faster, others slower. If I never kept track of such a thing would Sony have given us such a great upgrade with 4.20? After all, when no one is looking anyone can fill your gas tank with regular and say it was premium. Wish more members appreciated that Sony probably sees these numbers and don't like seeing me give bad report cards. Wish more people would help with reporting load times. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Super Moderator
|
![]()
Did you see this Tron?
http://support.sony-europe.com/hav/d...0&f=FW_BDPS300 Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
New Member
Aug 2008
|
![]()
So you are saying that the DD true HD can only be used through the HDMI out? the optical line coming out of the back of the BDP s300 wont carry the decoded signal?
If it doesnt decode the TrueHD, does it still pass 5.1 sound from a lower generation dolby digital format? |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Super Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
New Member
Aug 2008
|
![]()
my understanding was the the optical toslink lines could carry the digital signal.. is this a conscious decision on their part to exclude it? or is it not possible to pass dolby true HD through an optical cable?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
New Member
Aug 2008
|
![]()
Ahh, alright this makes sense. I was excited to hear that the bdp s300 can decode the HD audio.. but i have receiver that doesnt have HDMI inputs. i suppose at some point i can upgrade the receiver to something a little more new-age.
thanks for all of the info passed here to a newbie. it is greatly appreciated. so how does the regular dolby digital sound in comparison? i assume for my purposes, i will still get decent surround sound... although not the best. |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
![]() Here is my thread which gives us a bench mark for a "load time performance table". I figure it is was time we had one. https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=62024 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
This is the only title I have that matches any of yours: POTC 3 0.58 1st load non BD-j (before the trailers) 0.42 2nd load BD-j (after the trailers) ----- 1.00 (Agrees with your load time) ![]() Other titles: Mummy 1.03 NT2 1.82 I, Robot 1.90 Sunshine 2.02 ID4 2.05 The last three are certainly poor load times ![]() Last edited by Yeha-Noha; 09-01-2008 at 05:01 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
* I, Robot: 2.18 / 1.47 * Independence Day: 2.27 / 1.42 Something is not jiving here. I loaded with a CD-R, did you use DVD-R? Did you reset the machine after the update? I've seen flash updates behave slowly until you cycle the player off / on. Last edited by tron3; 09-02-2008 at 01:51 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Edited my original post to include the following. This rating isn't really a ding against the players, as it can become a rating system for the movies load times.
Here is my suggested "Load Time Performance Table". Consider 90 seconds and under as the tolerable sweet spot. * Non BD-J loading in 35 seconds or less. Excellent. * BD-J up to 75 seconds. Very Good. * BD-J 76 to 90 seconds. Good. (Tolerable Threshold) * BD-J 91 to 100 seconds. Very Fair * BD-J 101 to 120 seconds. Fair. * BD-J over 120 seconds. Poor. * BD-J over 180 seconds. Very Poor. Last edited by tron3; 09-02-2008 at 02:06 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
oppo load times | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | jvvjvv | 5 | 07-26-2009 03:05 AM |
Killzone 2 load times. | PS3 | ThePhantomOak | 28 | 03-03-2009 06:58 AM |
Load Times | Newbie Discussion | ra7968 | 1 | 10-31-2008 10:41 PM |
Rating acceptable performance for Sony BDP-S30x | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | tron3 | 3 | 08-31-2008 08:48 PM |
|
|