The Hobbit An Unexpected Journey 3D Blu-ray (2012) [Region Free] [Both Cuts]

[Lnds500]

Originally Posted by Paul H

What do you understand would be "subpar" about 4K passive 3D displays in relation to existing Full HD 1080P Active 3D Displays?
Blu-ray 3Ds should display at their Full HD 1080P resolution, same as todays active displays, eliminating todays passive half-image interlace separation artifacts, and the viewing distance comparable to todays 1080P active technology without flicker.?

It will be a subpar technology when 4K comes to market as in you won't be seeing 4K images, simple as that. I'm not bashing either technology, but let's call a spade a spade, passive 3D hurts resolution. We always knew that and it hasn't changed. Maybe down the road we'll get to resolutions that high that we won't be able to tell the difference, but 1080 is not high enough (depending on how far you sit of course)

Sony Announces First 4K, Passive 3D TV: 1080P For Each Eye!

They are making such a big deal out of this when it's the lamest thing ever. It's not better, it's cheaper and that's it. We are celebrating 1080p for each eye in the 4K era? We already have that. And all that to avoid paying for extra glasses (cause that's the big issue with active 3D) which can be found pretty cheap nowadays? So no, passive 4K is nothing to be celebrating about. It's good for passive 3D owners but not good for the rest. I'll take full 4K 3D over 1080p any day.

You said it yourself, "same as todays active displays". That's good news? It's like saying, "whoa, we can finally have 540p 3D" in the 1080p era.

Originally Posted by keb33509

But they want 4K 3D Nothing is ever good enough for whiny people. I still bet many will be jealous when I have a 4K set, and they do not.

Dude-full-of-himself alert. Here's a newsflash for you, having new technology doesn't mean anything if you don't what it is and how you can use it, and you clearly have problems in that area.