As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Airport: The Complete Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$67.11
 
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.00
 
Outland 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.32
 
Corpse Bride 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
Halloween III: Season of the Witch 4K (Blu-ray)
$14.37
 
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
Gary Cooper 4-Film Collection (Blu-ray)
$23.99
11 hrs ago
Pee-wee's Big Adventure (Blu-ray)
$32.28
10 hrs ago
Happy Gilmore 4K (Blu-ray)
$22.49
 
U-571 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Shin Godzilla 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.96
 
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-10-2007, 07:36 PM   #961
cking2729 cking2729 is offline
Senior Member
 
cking2729's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Don View Post
they are PROBABLY being paid handsomely by MS...

why else would you dangle your movies out there in high def?

I mean, the majority of their movies are half assed in regards to compression, so I guess they figure to let people get the watered down HD versions until they use BD+
Well we all know Paramount/Dreamworks was handsomly paid, but Universal has been ridiculously outspoken about how they want everything DRM free. Hence their outspoken support of M$, M$'s upcoming HD download service, and HD-DuD. This is also what their recent squabble with Apple/iTunes was all about. Graffeo explicity said back in 05 or so, that "managed copying" and DRM free stuff was the way their company wanted to go strategically. He also used HD-DVD's "size advantage" of 30 GB at the time as another reason for their exclusive HD-DuD support.....And we all know how that has worked out for them
 
Old 12-10-2007, 07:39 PM   #962
OokieSpookie OokieSpookie is offline
Banned
 
Nov 2007
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mystiksuicide View Post
http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/12/...ood-loses.html

Is this site credible at all? I never heard of them before. Did they just read the business week article and write the same thing? Or are they truly insiders?
I have never heard of them before so I feel no real need to give it any real weight.
Always nice to read though but in my opinion no different than any other analyst supporting either side.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 07:44 PM   #963
cking2729 cking2729 is offline
Senior Member
 
cking2729's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OokieSpookie View Post
I have never heard of them before so I feel no real need to give it any real weight.
Always nice to read though but in my opinion no different than any other analyst supporting either side.

Clearly the people that read this blog aren't the brightest, either....

"David, I don't have a dog in this fight, but I've been to CES the past two years and I've seen the biggest, bestest, etc displays the CE guys have to offer. Maybe my eyes aren't sharp enough, but I can't see an enormous difference between the next-gen DVDs and regular DVDs when they're on a really nice screen."

And none other than Deadmeat made a post on the same blog with his "All indications point to Warner dropping Blu-Ray for HD-DVD(their co-creation)."



Last edited by cking2729; 12-10-2007 at 07:48 PM.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 07:45 PM   #964
spicynacho spicynacho is offline
Active Member
 
spicynacho's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cking2729 View Post
Well we all know Paramount/Dreamworks was handsomly paid, but Universal has been ridiculously outspoken about how they want everything DRM free.
They must have perfected the frivelous IP lawsuit against grandmothers.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 07:51 PM   #965
JimSD JimSD is offline
Expert Member
 
JimSD's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OokieSpookie View Post
I have never heard of them before so I feel no real need to give it any real weight.
Always nice to read though but in my opinion no different than any other analyst supporting either side.
I looked on the 'About' part of their website and the guy (Peter Kafka) who wrote the little blurb about Blu-ray winning is a Senior Editor at Forbes.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 07:53 PM   #966
Titan Titan is offline
Active Member
 
Feb 2007
San Diego
101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimSD View Post
I looked on the 'About' part of their website and the guy (Peter Kafka) who wrote the little blurb about Blu-ray winning is a Senior Editor at Forbes.

Sounds credible to me
 
Old 12-10-2007, 07:54 PM   #967
Paden Paden is offline
Active Member
 
Paden's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
Default

Sorry, I've actually got nothing to say but I just want to see this thread get to 1,000 posts ASAP. Thanks...
 
Old 12-10-2007, 07:55 PM   #968
mystiksuicide mystiksuicide is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
mystiksuicide's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Miami
305
27
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JimSD View Post
I looked on the 'About' part of their website and the guy (Peter Kafka) who wrote the little blurb about Blu-ray winning is a Senior Editor at Forbes.
Well I am no market analyst but id say senior editor at Forbes does carry some prestige.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 07:55 PM   #969
BadAss BadAss is offline
Senior Member
 
BadAss's Avatar
 
Feb 2007
England
63
63
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paden View Post
Sorry, I've actually got nothing to say but I just want to see this thread get to 1,000 posts ASAP. Thanks...
....or your post count pass 100.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:00 PM   #970
DaViD Boulet DaViD Boulet is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Jan 2007
Washington, DC
1
Default

Quote:
PM was mum on the other rumors...this time he at least confirmed there was a rumor and seemed to waste no time expressing that..
Yes, but things can change. Unless a deal has been *signed*, WB has no obligations to the BDA and could do whatever they wanted during/after CES despite whatever hand-shake conversations they are having now with BDA members.

It's up to consumers to keep BD looking like a sales-advantage for WB in addition to whatever back-door deals are being negotiated.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:02 PM   #971
Neo65 Neo65 is offline
Senior Member
 
Neo65's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Default

Is Rich Greenfield an activist analyst for the research arm of Pali Capital? If so, he has been covering TWX for a long time. Supposedly, Rich was one of the hounds asking for Dick Parson's exit from TWX.

So, if googled articles are anything to go by, Rich knows his TWX.

Has Jeff Bewkes said anything about the HDM. This is likely not high on his list, but has he publicly said anything on blu-ray?

Still, you'd think WB wants to control the timing of this, and not have these leaks make life difficult for everyone.

Don't forget there's also the hd dvd hail mary play, where green suitcases can still show up.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:05 PM   #972
CptGreedle CptGreedle is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
CptGreedle's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Sworn super-hero now services Atlanta (and suburbs).
128
5
Send a message via AIM to CptGreedle
Default

With all the hype lately about Blu-ray, it looks like this week Blu-ray is on the lips of everyone. Analysts claiming Blu-ray wins in 2008, statistics showing the lead Blu-ray has, the move WB could make, etc...
It looks like the people are really beginning to like Blu-ray, and I am sure that WB sees this too.
As for those brining up Disney, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY WOULD GO NEUTRAL!?!?! Disney has NEVER even remotely said anything like they were thinking of going neutral, they never did anything to make one think they were interested in it.. it is all pure HD DVD FUD. Disney loves Blu-ray, it has made them a lot of money especially with the PotC movies and Pixar as well. Also their Disney Blu-ray Magical Tour, their ads pointing out how well Blu-ray is doing, their announcements saying how much they love Blu-ray...
Disney is as Blu as you can get.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:09 PM   #973
zipbags zipbags is offline
Active Member
 
Nov 2007
Default

You would think that the BDA would have signed some sort of deal with Warner before allowing the Lionsgate VC to make his comments. Since it wouldn't matter what HD-dvd did.


Funny, you check some other forums and you would either think nothing is up or HD-dvd is going to win.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:10 PM   #974
Bullseye Bullseye is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
Bullseye's Avatar
 
Sep 2006
Ireland
24
70
760
44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zipbags View Post
You would think that the BDA would have signed some sort of deal with Warner before allowing the Lionsgate VC to make his comments. Since it wouldn't matter what HD-dvd did.


Funny, you check some other forums and you would either think nothing is up or HD-dvd is going to win.
Whats to say they haven't?
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:11 PM   #975
Alan Gordon Alan Gordon is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Alan Gordon's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Dawson, GA
879
2461
437
1874
2065
4103
1896
44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zipbags View Post
You would think that the BDA would have signed some sort of deal with Warner before allowing the Lionsgate VC to make his comments. Since it wouldn't matter what HD-dvd did.
I'm wondering if they haven't already...

Quote:
Originally Posted by zipbags View Post
Funny, you check some other forums and you would either think nothing is up or HD-dvd is going to win.
It is, didn't you know?!

~Alan
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:11 PM   #976
OokieSpookie OokieSpookie is offline
Banned
 
Nov 2007
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zipbags View Post
You would think that the BDA would have signed some sort of deal with Warner before allowing the Lionsgate VC to make his comments. Since it wouldn't matter what HD-dvd did.


Funny, you check some other forums and you would either think nothing is up or HD-dvd is going to win.
Nobody allowed him to say it, and from what was said it caused alot of stress behind the scenes.
But again I think what speaks loudest right now is the fact that WB has not come out to deny it as they have in the past when rumors hit about them.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:14 PM   #977
The Don The Don is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Apr 2006
12
2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DaViD Boulet View Post
Yes, but things can change. Unless a deal has been *signed*, WB has no obligations to the BDA and could do whatever they wanted during/after CES despite whatever hand-shake conversations they are having now with BDA members.

It's up to consumers to keep BD looking like a sales-advantage for WB in addition to whatever back-door deals are being negotiated.
I am fully aware of all of this...as was said in my previous posts...

I wasn't one of the people going nuts over the previous rumors...

this one has some legs...so it puts a smile on my face for the time being...
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:16 PM   #978
sparksj sparksj is offline
Active Member
 
Nov 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CptGreedle View Post
As for those brining up Disney, WHAT MAKES YOU THINK THEY WOULD GO NEUTRAL!?!?! Disney has NEVER even remotely said anything like they were thinking of going neutral, they never did anything to make one think they were interested in it.. it is all pure HD DVD FUD. Disney loves Blu-ray. Disney is as Blu as you can get.
Don't fool yourself. Disney loves money.... If the HD DVD sales were high enough to make up for the cost of creating the line and still bring them, profit, they would likely go neutral. Their first loyalty is to their stock holders, not Blu Ray.

Not to worry though, sales are so low compared to DVD that It's not like that they would recoup the cost of setting up an HD DVD line. Although, a combo disney disk would be powerful since most of the kiddies wouldn't have a HD player in their rooms yet.

Also, just because someone mentions this as a "remote" possibility, please don't invoke the FUD title on them. All of this thread is speculation at the moment based on rumor. I think it's good to look at all possibilities regardless of how remote they are. I wasn't thowing out FUD, I was just asking the question, which I think is a valid concern.

Last edited by sparksj; 12-10-2007 at 08:23 PM.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:17 PM   #979
dialog_gvf dialog_gvf is offline
Moderator
 
dialog_gvf's Avatar
 
Nov 2006
Toronto
320
Default

Deadmeat's back, and pushing his lies

Quote:
Deadmeat said: December 10, 2007 3:22 PM

This is nothing more than a repeat of errorous BusinessWeek report.

Longer it drags out, worse it becomes for BDA because of immeidiate arrival of $99~149 Chinese HD-DVD players 2q2008. The first wave of Chinese HD-DVD players is already here, in the form of Venturer SHD7000 and Toshiba HD-A3(A rebadged Chinese player), and Toshiba HD-A3 already its damage to BDA, outselling all of Blu-Ray players combined by the factor of 2:1 during Black Friday and increasing its installed base lead to 550K vs 200K in the US.

The tone of Warner comments hint that they are in fact dropping Blu-Ray, not HD-DVD which is actually Warner's own baby.
 
Old 12-10-2007, 08:18 PM   #980
Terjyn Terjyn is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Jul 2007
122
Default

How big would the bribe have to be for them to give up (essentially) all copy protection?
 
Closed Thread
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Blu-ray > Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Warner Rumor Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Blu-dock Saint 69 12-27-2008 01:54 PM
Rumor: LittleBigPlanet coming to the PSP PlayStation Vita and PlayStation Portable xtop 8 04-08-2008 07:08 PM
Source of $500 Million Warner Payoff Rumor Exposed Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Zotar 14 01-21-2008 06:41 PM
Warner Going Blu-ray Exclusive (Rumor) Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology SA0CD 2039 09-27-2007 05:39 PM


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:18 AM.