|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $33.49 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.49 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $24.96 1 day ago
| ![]() $44.99 | ![]() $35.99 1 hr ago
| ![]() $27.13 1 day ago
| ![]() $27.57 1 day ago
| ![]() $4.99 45 min ago
| ![]() $54.49 | ![]() $35.33 |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
I have a question
a friend was telling me that HD-DVD can do Linear-PCM. I didn't think they could. I've searched but was looking for something about the true differences, spec wise between HD-DVD and Blu-Ray to show him. thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Guru
May 2006
|
![]()
it could in theory do it. but, the bandwidth required is so large good luck mixing it with a movie
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Jul 2007
|
![]()
There are three HD DVD titles with LPCM.
A Musicares Person of the Year Tribute Freedom Vol. 1 Choronos Some big hitters there. HD DVD as a whole is way behind the next gen audio curve compared to Blu-ray. It is mostly due to the limitations of the format. |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Special Member
Jan 2007
Virginia
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Jul 2007
|
![]()
Not as lame as the total number of titles they have that even had lossless audio, a paltry 50 and their big exclusive titles coming out this fall don't even have it. Blu-ray has 176 and all of the big titles coming will have lossless audio.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
yes. I rarely watch extras. I'd rather have good visual and audio performance than extras.... The main feature is the movie, not the extras. And slowly but surely, blu will have BDJ titles
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Jul 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Expert Member
Jul 2007
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |
Blu-ray Archduke
|
![]() Quote:
I have been reading a lot of articals about an HD DVD 51 gig disk being approved, has it been or am I getting bad info. I was thinking with 17 gigs a layer that the pits of info may have to be closer will you need a new HD DVD player to read the 17 gig disks. I have also read Blu Ray as of now can support only two layers is this true? Approved or not, it may be a while before we ever see it in the market. It's highly doubtful they'll come out with a version of HD DVD or BD that will obsolete all the current players. That would effectively kill the format, and amazingly these companies aren't that stupid. Almost that stupid, but not quite. I posted almost exactly the same thing here Last edited by Deciazulado; 09-23-2007 at 06:29 AM. Reason: added link |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Blu-ray Samurai
Jul 2007
|
![]()
I believe it turned out that just the technical specs of the Area 51 Disc were approved. It will still be at least a year until they can get it to manufacturing and there is no guarantee yet if current HD DVD players can use them. Plus this disc just gave them the space, they are still starved for bitrate so a 50gig disc like Pirates of the Carribean still couldn't be carried over to the 51gig disc.
BD has had 4 layer and 8 layer working in the lab 2 years ago. No one knows if that will ever get used, but if it does it would probably only be for storage, not movies. So BD-50 will probably be the max we see. |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Senior Member
|
![]() Quote:
Does the Sony s300 capable of PCM as an audio option? I'm sorry, so many questions. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||
Blu-ray Samurai
Jul 2007
|
![]() Quote:
Eitherway I don't expect them to start using PCM, there isn't any reason to. All their players have mandatory TrueHD decoding, yet few Studios are even putting that on the discs. If HD DVD has something to be worried about, that should be high up on the list. Quote:
Last edited by LynxFX; 09-23-2007 at 02:30 AM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]() Quote:
Blu-ray does not, that's why most of the players have at least 5.1 analog outs, thereby allowing for audio compatibility with older receivers. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Banned
|
![]()
if hd dvd decided to give the customer lossless sound they included a dolby trueHD track. therefore no need for pcm.
the best bet for lossless on blu-ray was pcm. most players couldn't decode trueHD, or the DTS-MA. I'm betting on the PCM being dropped off most BD discs in the future, so I upgraded to the samsung 1400 player. that really sucks because i loved the 1200 player. sony is all about giving you the best sound, but in a lot of cases they made it difficult to take advantage of it. Hd dvd has the pieces in place, but did not utilize it as much as i think they should. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Linear PCM vs Bitstream | Receivers | NovaBomb | 562 | 11-10-2018 01:18 AM |
Linear PCM 2.0 or DD 5.1 | Receivers | Noodleman | 9 | 11-09-2009 04:43 AM |
Linear PCM the same as DD TrueHD?? | Audio Theory and Discussion | Red Pill 101 | 18 | 07-11-2009 01:12 AM |
Linear PCM or bitstream | Receivers | DAAKNESS | 7 | 03-31-2009 04:10 PM |
Bitstream VS Linear PCM | Newbie Discussion | He-Man | 4 | 12-23-2007 11:52 PM |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|