
Did you know that Blu-ray.com also is available for United Kingdom? Simply select the

|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Did you know that Blu-ray.com also is available for United Kingdom? Simply select the ![]() |
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $37.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 5 hrs ago
| ![]() $38.02 7 hrs ago
| ![]() $30.72 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $72.99 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $79.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $31.99 16 hrs ago
| ![]() $38.02 11 hrs ago
| ![]() $32.99 3 hrs ago
| ![]() $96.99 15 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 3 hrs ago
|
![]() |
#1 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
This is one technology I could never figure out. Just as with DVD after it, you could not record with this unit. Sure, it was better quality than VHS, but exactly what was the appeal?
Here was a technology in which, for all intents and purposes, was little more than an LP size CD. Plus you had to flip the disc to finish the movie! That is like flipping a record to finish hearing your favorite song. I hear you had to be extremely careful with the darned things too. I am not trying to beat a dead horse, I merely trying to understand who spent that kind of money on a player with such bothersome quirks? It was like having the best and worst of both worlds. Last edited by tron3; 08-20-2008 at 02:33 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Banned
Apr 2007
|
![]()
DVD resolution in a decade before DVD.
LPCM 2.0 sound in a time of stereo sound. It was strictly for the HT fans. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
another one of trons pointless threads
from my understanding (having never owned LD) Improved PQ over VHS Analog multi channel audio (higher bitrate than DVD, so some people preferred them over DVD) Came out atleast a decade before DVD I think it was higher resolution than VHS and no vhs cassette wear/tear |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
Most of those special features some people love on DVD...first done on LD:
Audio Commentaries Behind the Scenes Features Deleted Scenes Isolated Scores Plus the higher resolution already mentioned by others. All available from the early '80s...a full 15 years before the release of DVD. I believe Roger Ebert was pushing LD on his show for the audio commentaries alone. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
|
![]()
The flipping of disks was really not that much of an issue. The laserdisk player that I have flipped the read head so there was no flipping needed. The quality was better than VHS and you didn't have to worry about analog quality rot of a tape. Tapes slowly lose picture quality as they sit on the shelf. Magnet field decay was, is a problem with vhs to this day. Look a vhs that you bought a long time ago (if you still have any) and you will see a picture that has degraded drastically. Laser did not have that issue. Pioneer really screwed themselves with not allowing others to make players until it was to late for the format. Really a shame I enjoy my laserdisk player to this day.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Perhaps you haven't been around long enough to see some of my more meanful threads during the height of the format war. I have received a number of messages from both members and a couple of mods thanking me for my contributions here. Mods are careful not to make it obvious as not to stroke my ego and encourage my more controversial behavior of the past. But I know what they are saying.
I have probably deleted more such e-mail than you have received. Believe it or not, I have followers and fans here. They don't march in lock step with me and I don't expect them to do so. They enjoy my insights, even when they don't agree with them. With me, they know they can politely argue against me and expect a thoughtful response in return. Yes, I can admit when I am wrong! Can you? The point is, the format war is over and short of movie releases nothing exciting is happening here. I have the right to post a question which is within forum rules. Last edited by tron3; 08-18-2008 at 02:42 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
You have to remember coming from the age of VHS to laserdisc was like stepping out of the shadows into the light(kinda like some of the lurkers we have here).
Better picture quality,better sound and most inportant no rewinding and fast forwarding. It was the first time that you had a crystan clear picture with movie theater quality sound, it was every movie fan dream come thru. The down side was the players was expensive and disc them selves was expensive and you had to flip the disc over to finish the movie. I think I might still have my Pioneer player and discs somewhere around. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
But go easy on stroking your ego. Don't explode your own head. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
Active Member
|
![]()
That's like asking "why did they invent the airplane before they invented the space shuttle?" New technologies have to start somewhere.
I don't regret owning a Laserdisc Player. Seeing how I ran my player until it completely died, I feel I got my moneys worth out of it. Plus I got a ton of slightly used laserdiscs from a local video rental place that tried stocking them. I was watching the Star Wars Trilogy on a digital format while all my friends were watching it on VHS. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
Trans-fud-ers was the name. But thank you everyone for your support. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
Personally I don't really know anything about Laserdisc...aside from the fact that they were big and like CDs. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Active Member
|
![]()
In re-reading this I agree that I don't think Tron was attacking LD users... However; I did get that impression initially. I guess I'm used to defending my past Laserdisc choises.
My player also automatically flipped the head, to read both sides. I don't think anyone has commented that movies longer than two hours had to fit on multiple discs... I admit that sucked. I think this tread needs a big group hug. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Anyways, I don't care if people make "pointless" threads. That's your opinion, not necessarily mine. ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Junior Member
|
![]()
In addition to improved PQ and sound over VHS, I really liked the fact that I could buy most movies a month or two before you could even rent them at a video store.
But the real reason I adopted LD's was their life expectancy vs. VHS. I had been using VHS tapes for a very long time and knew they broke, tape quality decreased over time etc. Although you could not record onto them, the movies you purchased were going to last a lot longer then those VHS tapes. I believe that those of us who adopted LD's early on, really paved the way for DVD's and ultimately BD's. We showed there are peopole out there where PQ and sound mattered. We would spend the money to buy the equipment and pay the premium price for those movies. I also have many imported LD's from Japan (especially Disney) that are in their original uncensored state, that simply could not be purchased any other way. On a different note, I also really liked the cover art, much like traditionalists like the cover art of their LP's and dislike CD's because they are so small. Last edited by TheGrillMaster; 08-18-2008 at 06:59 PM. |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
Ben Stiller: What's The Appeal? | Movie Polls | bruce_pullen | 54 | 12-15-2015 11:57 PM |
Laser Disc - What Hardware To Buy? | General Chat | DrinkMore | 16 | 09-06-2011 11:47 PM |
new video player out now WOW! will take over Blu-ray. Laser disc! | General Chat | mustang-gt-2002 | 11 | 05-05-2009 03:57 AM |
Blu-ray laser and DVD laser | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | thecolster123 | 1 | 01-09-2007 11:36 AM |
Will Blu ray end up like Laser Disc? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | Foaley77 | 13 | 10-24-2005 01:38 PM |
|
|