|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $82.99 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 21 hrs ago
| ![]() $33.54 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $124.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $28.10 30 min ago
| ![]() $39.02 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $35.99 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $24.96 |
![]() |
#22541 | |
Moderator
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | thatguamguy (07-14-2016) |
![]() |
#22542 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
If I had the master, I could make a BluRay master file with menus and scenes to send off to a printer. Whole different ballgame if you are doing the scanning of the film itself. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22543 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
LOL, I saw that on the OP, but I guess I wanted to know where you get that info from, especially where you get some ideas of the actual inventory numbers, so that I could look things up myself in the future, especially if there is a place where you can sign up to be sent email notifications of low inventory for specific titles.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22544 | |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]() Quote:
With the specific numbers, I believe they tend to be pulled from Facebook posts, but if you really want to know for sure, I think you'd have to search this thread to find when somebody posted it and see who they are quoting. For me, I give the thread-starter the benefit of the doubt that the information is being reported accurately. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | michaeljoo (07-14-2016) |
![]() |
#22546 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
Do you have to create an account to see this? Thanks. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22547 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
Sure, but the trick would be getting the studio to sell you the license to release the remaster with no track record and only basic video production skills on your resume.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22548 | ||
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#22549 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
Yes, I looked at the FB page, but it didn't seem to have a dedicated section to low quantity alerts like the TT page did. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22550 | ||
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Not being familiar with the thread I didn't know how regularly it was updated, but it seems like it is regularly. Thanks for putting together and maintaining this thread. The list of all the recent releases was great for helping me to see what was out there. Unfortunately, my cart already has 11 titles in it now. There's no way I'm going to (or should, at any rate) be buying that many, especially without a sale. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#22551 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
As long as you can prove you have the collateral to get sued for enough money should you break the agreement, it won't be too hard. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22552 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
There's risk for Twilight Time under their model, too. They've got some movies they released six years ago that haven't sold out yet, and they've already paid the licensing fees on those. They aren't, as just about everyone else, only paying the fees on the ones they sell. I do understand why people don't like Twilight Times business model, but they only release films that A - the rights holders have mastered for Blu-ray, B - the rights holders don't want to release themselves, and C - the rights holders have decided that giving Twilight Time exclusivity for three years for a fixed sum will provide the best ROI. They could license to someone else and get paid a bit for each unit shipped. It could be more, or it could be less. They do that often. For whatever reason, they don't do it with the Twilight Time titles. Maybe nobody else wanted them. Maybe nobody offered them enough to make it worth the bean counting. Only they know. I'm pretty sure, though, if someone presented them a solid plan for making more money for those three years, that's the way they'd go. So if you want to blame someone, blame the studios. They are the ones that decide this limited time, limited number model is the best way for them to release their movies. They could do it themselves, or they could go through someone else. They make the choice. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22553 | |
Expert Member
|
![]() Quote:
It would be easier with the Twilight Time model, since you are paying it all up front, and it really doesn't matter to the studio whether you actually ship anything or not. They've already got all they were going to. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22554 | |
Banned
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22555 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
Studios also give preference to certain labels. TT has mentioned in the past that they were offered titles that they passed on because there wasn't a good enough master of, which was then released by another label to less-than-stellar results. For a random person to go through all of the work and negotiating to do only one physical film release is not realistic. Film studios are businesses and you have to have a trustworthy and proven background to do business with them, hence why we don't see small labels popping up all the time releasing stuff. TT's founders had decades of experience in the film industry before starting their own boutique label. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: | Aclea (07-14-2016) |
![]() |
#22556 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
I am not knocking Twilight Time, most of their movies are so niche or old they likely wouldn't be profitable to sell any other way. The ones that would be profitable on Amazon for $15 are likely used to boost their income in the face of slower selling niche stuff, and I believe they have bluntly said that. I totally get it, and the consumer makes the value choice so no one is being misled or mistreated. However, to act like they do a better job in any way to earn that $30 is silly, Kino do the same job for half price and Criterion/Arrow do a MUCH better job for less as well. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22557 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
I'm not trying to attack or defend their business model. It is what it is. I'm just glad that somebody is putting out these movies, even if it means that I have to pay a bit more for some of them. |
|
![]() |
Thanks given by: |
![]() |
#22558 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
I would imagine after licensing costs, replication, having someone design the artwork for the wraps and booklets, paying Julie for her essays, printing the wraps and inserts, paying Technicolor to replicate, package and distribute the discs, they do not end up with too much profit. What they do end up making they probably put right into the business again for future releases.
It is two guys, Nick Redman and Brian Jamieson who started TT with their own money. Sure it is easy to ***** and moan about what they charge, but you try to do what they are doing and charge half the price, see how long you stay in business. I think TT is doing a great job. I also think Cohen Media, Kino, Olive and Shout are wonderful. Thankfully these companies exist so we can have vintage films on Blu ray. Honestly, how much longer do we have to have the discussion about how TT runs its business? |
![]() |
Thanks given by: | cjamescook (07-15-2016), Doc Moonlight (07-15-2016), Jobla (07-15-2016), lemonski (07-15-2016), ParaOK (07-16-2016), spargs (07-15-2016), Widescreenfilmguy (07-16-2016) |
![]() |
#22559 |
Active Member
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|