|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 | ![]() $101.99 9 hrs ago
| ![]() $124.99 20 hrs ago
| ![]() $23.79 4 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.96 | ![]() $70.00 | ![]() $29.95 | ![]() $33.49 | ![]() $30.49 | ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $33.49 |
![]() |
#1 |
Active Member
|
![]()
The Aspect Ratio for this rls is 2:39:1. The original rls from Alliance was 1:78:1 which is wrong and stretched the picture out.
https://www.blu-ray.com/movies/Blade-Blu-ray/21832/ |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Special Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Power Member
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Blu-ray Champion
|
![]()
It's most likely the same disc as before that's cropped to 1.78 from 2.39. On the original Alliance release, I'd give the video a 3/5. I think it's a good transfer, but the only thing keeping it a 5/5 is the fact that it's cropped from scope to matted.
Last edited by Deciazulado; 09-15-2011 at 08:14 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Site Manager
|
![]() Quote:
1971-1993 0.700" x 0.838" 2.39 1993-2011 0.690" x 0.825" 2.39 (2X anamorphic lens) Trinity OAR is 2.39 too The actual aspect ratio of the Steelbook disc is probably the same as the old one: Last edited by Deciazulado; 05-26-2011 at 11:26 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Blu-ray King
|
![]()
You're right. Sorry about the typo.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Blu-ray Guru
![]() Oct 2010
-
-
|
![]() Quote:
Note that Blade Trinity is supposed to be 2.35:1, not 1.85:1 as stated on this thread. Last edited by Morsoth; 05-31-2011 at 02:56 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]()
Just to clear up some confusion about Blade:Trinity, the Alliance Blu is indeed 2.39:1. The packaging says 1.78:1 but the actual film on the disc is correct. I just popped it back in to confirm. Only the original Blade is cropped, the other 2 are just fine.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Active Member
|
![]()
which is mind boggling as to why blade 2 and 3 are proper and 1 isn't.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Blu-ray Samurai
|
![]() Quote:
You can safely buy 2 and 3. AQ on Blade 2 is awesome! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |
Blu-ray Guru
![]() Oct 2010
-
-
|
![]() Quote:
The cover mistake confused me! But, even with some flaws, it was rather enjoyable to see them in Hi-Def. Even Blade with a modified aspect ratio looked great... But I hope a USA version will come soon. Last edited by Morsoth; 05-31-2011 at 02:57 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Blu-ray King
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Member
|
![]()
I actually bought all 3 of these on Blu from FYE used and never realized that they were not the correct releases! The aspect ratio in the first one bothers me a bit but i'll live for now. Actually I am curious as to how I can add these three movies to my blu-ray.com collection since they arent searchable it seems..
![]() thx Ant Edit: I figured out how to add it.. Last edited by fyreant; 09-15-2011 at 03:19 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |
Blu-ray Grand Duke
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Blu-ray Ninja
|
![]()
There was a thing floating around the net the other day indicating that Warner was licensing out all the newline titles from the mid 90s-2004 to EchoBridge, that hadnt been released on BD by wb yet, not sure if theres any truth there, hope not or we will be getting some pretty crappy BDs of great new line films in the near future
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
|