Daredevil 2

[davidPS3]

Have not heard a peep on this one. Doubt it will happen though as the first one was a disappointment.

[gvortex7]

I liked the the director's cut of Daredevil. I guess I'm in the minority.

[WickyWoo]

The director's cut was excellent

[Lord_Stewie]

Originally Posted by gvortex7

I liked the the director's cut of Daredevil. I guess I'm in the minority.

Originally Posted by WickyWoo

The director's cut was excellent

i got to be honest with you guys, i didn't see the director's cut. What are the differences compared to the theatrical release?

[gvortex7]

Originally Posted by shadblz

i got to be honest with you guys, i didn't see the director's cut. What are the differences compared to the theatrical release?

The director's cut is 30 minutes longer which includes more fight scenes and better character development. Especially with regards to the scenes between Electra and Matt/Daredevil.

[Lord_Stewie]

Originally Posted by gvortex7

The director's cut is 30 minutes longer which includes more fight scenes and better character development. Especially with regards to the scenes between Electra and Matt/Daredevil.

Sometimes i just don't get it with the director's cut. I mean if it explains the story/development better, then there is no point of editing it. you know what i mean, right?

[Sky_Captain]

Originally Posted by shadblz

Sometimes i just don't get it with the director's cut. I mean if it explains the story/development better, then there is no point of editing it. you know what i mean, right?

Well, the Producer on Daredevil got a little too intimate with HIS vision of the movie. He comes across as a right pr*ck on the dvd extras. I'll settle for a nice BD release of the Dir's Cut, nevermind a sequel. Hear me, Fox? It's money in the bank...

[JonBidinger]

The movie was originally going to be rated R, but Fox partway through production told them to make it PG-13 so that it would be a success on par with Spider-Man. The studio made him cut the film. The Director's Cut is incredibly better and this is from someone who liked the Theatrical cut.

[gvortex7]

Originally Posted by shadblz

Sometimes i just don't get it with the director's cut. I mean if it explains the story/development better, then there is no point of editing it. you know what i mean, right?

Actually. in many people's eyes (especially studio execs) it is better to have a shorter, more concise (to the point) version of such action flicks in the movie theater environment. These type of movies tend to be a bit shorter that way they can hold the viewer's attention better. If you go off on a tangent in the storyline, then you risk losing fluidity and a certain pace which is essential to the success of such movies.

[ben7ben3]

ben affleck? i thought he didnt act anymore. the only movie i ever liked with him was armageddon, and plenty of people don't like that one either. however, his directing debut with Gone Baby Gone was quite good