As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
11 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
The Creator 4K (Blu-ray)
$20.07
1 hr ago
How to Train Your Dragon (Blu-ray)
$19.99
4 hrs ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.13
 
Back to the Future Part II 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
The Conjuring 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.13
1 day ago
Jurassic World Rebirth 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.95
 
House Party 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
 
Dan Curtis' Classic Monsters (Blu-ray)
$29.99
1 day ago
Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$70.00
 
Casper 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.57
1 day ago
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Audio > Subwoofers
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-28-2009, 01:23 AM   #1
McPanse McPanse is offline
Member
 
Jun 2009
Northern Va.
2
37
Default Big Subs: Worth it for "sub"-reference listening?

I'm looking to replace my Cambridge Soundworks Newton PS500 8" dual driver sealed sub with something bigger and better.

I'm leaning toward an SVS PC-12-Plus for my home theater, which takes up half of a 26' x 16' x 7'8" in my finished basement.

I don't do a ton of reference-level movie watching -- I tend to keep the volume down in the 60-65 dB range.

What does a sub like the SVS PC-12-Plus bring to the party when listening at these more moderate volumes? Should I expect it to do something my 8" sub does not?

Anybody have any experience upgrading from a starter sub who can share their impressions of what their bigger, better sub added to their music and/or home theater experience when the goal was something less disturbing the neighbors with an oh-so-real T-Rex stomp?

Anybody find that their bigger,better sub produced more boom and bass then you wanted to feel or hear?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 01:27 AM   #2
McPanse McPanse is offline
Member
 
Jun 2009
Northern Va.
2
37
Default

Here's a pic of the room. I'm thinking of putting a cylinder sub in the front right corner.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC_0024.jpg (75.1 KB, 87 views)
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 01:53 AM   #3
brokenthumb brokenthumb is offline
Active Member
 
brokenthumb's Avatar
 
Jul 2009
Colquitt, GA (MEMBER OF THE "ECPP")™
377
1
1
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McPanse View Post
I'm looking to replace my Cambridge Soundworks Newton PS500 8" dual driver sealed sub with something bigger and better.

I'm leaning toward an SVS PC-12-Plus for my home theater, which takes up half of a 26' x 16' x 7'8" in my finished basement.

I don't do a ton of reference-level movie watching -- I tend to keep the volume down in the 60-65 dB range.

What does a sub like the SVS PC-12-Plus bring to the party when listening at these more moderate volumes? Should I expect it to do something my 8" sub does not?

Anybody have any experience upgrading from a starter sub who can share their impressions of what their bigger, better sub added to their music and/or home theater experience when the goal was something less disturbing the neighbors with an oh-so-real T-Rex stomp?

Anybody find that their bigger,better sub produced more boom and bass then you wanted to feel or hear?
I upgraded from a JBL 10" sub to the SVS PC12-NSD. Here are some of my impressions after owning it for a week. I usually listen at 68dB. https://forum.blu-ray.com/showpost.p...&postcount=210
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 09:50 AM   #4
Fors* Fors* is offline
Moderator
 
Fors*'s Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Pottstown, PA
160
12
142
11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McPanse View Post
I'm looking to replace my Cambridge Soundworks Newton PS500 8" dual driver sealed sub with something bigger and better.

I'm leaning toward an SVS PC-12-Plus for my home theater, which takes up half of a 26' x 16' x 7'8" in my finished basement.

I don't do a ton of reference-level movie watching -- I tend to keep the volume down in the 60-65 dB range.

What does a sub like the SVS PC-12-Plus bring to the party when listening at these more moderate volumes? Should I expect it to do something my 8" sub does not?

Anybody have any experience upgrading from a starter sub who can share their impressions of what their bigger, better sub added to their music and/or home theater experience when the goal was something less disturbing the neighbors with an oh-so-real T-Rex stomp?

Anybody find that their bigger,better sub produced more boom and bass then you wanted to feel or hear?
I went from my Polk PSW10 10" sub w/50 watt amp tp my SVS PC12-NSD and it is night and day. The SVS can easily handle the very low frequencies with plenty of headroom. The Polk sub will create port noise and "chuffing" when it tried to get down that low. It would bottom out around 35hz-40Hz, which is just when the bass response gets going. The SVS sub can easily handle that and down below 20hz, which is incredible. It is totally worth it, as my SVS sub (the smallest of the cylinder subs) has a 325 watt amp, can get down to 18Hz and it even haves a smaller footprint than the box subs. Throw in the cylinder look that is awesome to look at, it is the top one or two audio investments I ever made, as a sub of this caliber should easily last for 5 or more years.

You can always calibrate a sub of this size to keep it from bothering neighbors and for a balanced sound with your entire system, so to me, the size or power of the sub is irrelevant. A sub adds sooo much to your HT audio experience, so don't go on the lower end with a sub, spend the extra $$. as it is a great investment and they will last a lot longer within your HT set-up than your speakers probably will.

Cylinder subs =
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 07:31 PM   #5
McPanse McPanse is offline
Member
 
Jun 2009
Northern Va.
2
37
Default

Thanks for the feedback, fellas. So many posts about sub upgrades emphasize the new gear's ability to (literally) rock the house.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 07:41 PM   #6
Fors* Fors* is offline
Moderator
 
Fors*'s Avatar
 
Jan 2009
Pottstown, PA
160
12
142
11
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McPanse View Post
Thanks for the feedback, fellas. So many posts about sub upgrades emphasize the new gear's ability to (literally) rock the house.
Please keep us posted as to which way you decide to go and with what sub manufacturer. It will be interesting to see what you end up with......
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 08:15 PM   #7
Beta Man Beta Man is offline
Moderator
 
Beta Man's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Juuuuuuuust A Bit Outside....
4
268
18
25
Default

Size isn't the only factor.... build quality, RMS, etc. all play an important role, but the size of the driver plays an important role in the frequency the sub can reach (not concerned with decibel level at this point) and larger drivers are easier to power and design for lower frequencies, and it's pretty hard to fight the physics of it.... Many smaller subs are very capable at the lower end, but their lack of size is made up for in the way they were designed/built.

You want the low frequency to be felt/heard, even when listening at moderate levels.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 09:09 PM   #8
McPanse McPanse is offline
Member
 
Jun 2009
Northern Va.
2
37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by forsberg21 View Post
Please keep us posted as to which way you decide to go and with what sub manufacturer. It will be interesting to see what you end up with......
Will do. Although at this point I'm pretty sure it will be the SVS PC-12-Plus.

The discontinued -- but still available -- 25-31PC-Plus at 32" tall is about $200 less and would be a better fit, aesthetically speaking (short enough to hide beside the bookcase in the same corner).

It has the 12.3 driver instead of the 12.4 and doesn't dip down as low (25 Hz vs. 20 Hz).

SVS recommended the PC-12 Plus, for what that's worth.

Any thoughts?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 09:18 PM   #9
Steve Steve is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Steve's Avatar
 
May 2008
Anna, TX
128
416
41
Default

I think you will be very happy with the SVS. I upgraded from an Onkyo HTiB sub to an MFW-15 and there is no comparison. The bigger sub can play much lower frequencies, and it also plays tighter and cleaner. You don't have to play at super loud levels to appreciate the improvement in the way it will sound.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 09:20 PM   #10
Big Daddy Big Daddy is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Big Daddy's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Southern California
79
122
1
Default

Size matters up to a certain point. Generally speaking, the 12" sub is a good size for home theater. The 10" can also work, but the 8" may be too small.

I prefer two quality 12" subwoofers to one very large and expensive 15" or 18" subwoofer. Two smaller 12" subwoofers will probably have better transient response, will give you more even and smoother bass across the room, and will be more satisfactory for both movies and music.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 10:01 PM   #11
Steve Steve is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Steve's Avatar
 
May 2008
Anna, TX
128
416
41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Daddy View Post
Size matters up to a certain point. Generally speaking, the 12" sub is a good size for home theater. The 10" can also work, but the 8" may be too small.

I prefer two quality 12" subwoofers to one very large and expensive 15" or 18" subwoofer. Two smaller 12" subwoofers will probably have better transient response, will give you more even and smoother bass across the room, and will be more satisfactory for both movies and music.
Big Daddy I'm curious to get your opinion on something. I don't disagree that two subs will usually provide better results than one. However, in a case like mine, where your room can only accommodate one, do you recommend a bigger 15" or 18" sub then? Assuming that the person's budget can cover a sub this big, of course.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 10:09 PM   #12
Drew664 Drew664 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Drew664's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
South Dakota
28
68
Default

This thread title reminded me of something over at the AVS forum.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=756408



Loved reading through that thread, and if you are a DIY kind of guy - you'd really enjoy yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 10:17 PM   #13
Steve Steve is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Steve's Avatar
 
May 2008
Anna, TX
128
416
41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drew664 View Post
This thread title reminded me of something over at the AVS forum.

http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?t=756408

Loved reading through that thread, and if you are a DIY kind of guy - you'd really enjoy yourself.
You can't accuse that guy of taking the cheap way out I guess.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 10:20 PM   #14
Big Daddy Big Daddy is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Big Daddy's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Southern California
79
122
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fireman325 View Post
Big Daddy I'm curious to get your opinion on something. I don't disagree that two subs will usually provide better results than one. However, in a case like mine, where your room can only accommodate one, do you recommend a bigger 15" or 18" sub then? Assuming that the person's budget can cover a sub this big, of course.
Don't go any higher than 15" subwoofer. Unless you are willing to spend a lot of money, a low-end 18" sub is too sloppy and wasteful.

Last edited by Big Daddy; 09-21-2009 at 02:50 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 10:33 PM   #15
Steve Steve is offline
Blu-ray Knight
 
Steve's Avatar
 
May 2008
Anna, TX
128
416
41
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Daddy View Post
Don't go any higher than 15" subwoofer. Unless you are willing to spend a lot of money, a low-end 18" sub is too sloppy and wasteful..
Thanks for the response. I was already under that impression regarding an 18" sub, but wanted to see what you thought about it. I have an MFW-15 (15") that I'm very happy with.

Last edited by Big Daddy; 09-21-2009 at 02:50 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2009, 10:37 PM   #16
Drew664 Drew664 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
Drew664's Avatar
 
Oct 2007
South Dakota
28
68
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fireman325 View Post
You can't accuse that guy of taking the cheap way out I guess.
Ya know, I never did find a price associated with what it cost him to build those. The way they talked about prices when they came up, it seemed like that only cost him around $1,000 for all the pieces.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 01:31 AM   #17
McPanse McPanse is offline
Member
 
Jun 2009
Northern Va.
2
37
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Daddy View Post
Size matters up to a certain point. Generally speaking, the 12" sub is a good size for home theater. The 10" can also work, but the 8" may be too small.

I prefer two quality 12" subwoofers to one very large and expensive 15" or 18" subwoofer. Two smaller 12" subwoofers will probably have better transient response, will give you more even and smoother bass across the room, and will be more satisfactory for both movies and music.
What do you think of running a new 12" sub with my existing 8" sub?
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 01:37 AM   #18
Big Daddy Big Daddy is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Big Daddy's Avatar
 
Jan 2008
Southern California
79
122
1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by McPanse View Post
What do you think of running a new 12" sub with my existing 8" sub?
That can work. Put the 12" subwoofer up front in a corner and put the 8" sub on the side of your sofa. Adjust their levels very carefully so that one subwoofer does not overpower the other one. If you calibrate them properly, the sub up front will give you deep and lower frequency bass sound and the smaller sub closer to you will give you midbass to upper bass frequencies.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 02:09 AM   #19
McPanse McPanse is offline
Member
 
Jun 2009
Northern Va.
2
37
Default

I'll probably give it a try, if only for grins. Unless it makes a dramatic difference, I'll relocate the 8" sub to my home office or living room, where I know it will make a positive contribution.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-29-2009, 02:34 PM   #20
BillCinLR BillCinLR is offline
Member
 
Sep 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Daddy View Post
Don't go any higher than 15" subwoofer. Unless you are willing to spend a lot of money, a low-end 18" sub is too sloppy and wasteful.
Big Daddy,

I don't believe that you have listened to any of the new EPIK 18" subwoofers ... I have the sealed 18" EPIK Dragon and it is neither sloppy nor wasteful.


Bill C

Last edited by Big Daddy; 09-21-2009 at 02:51 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Audio > Subwoofers

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Bette Midler "Beaches" and "Big Business" in Blu-ray?? Wish Lists Krister 10 01-23-2011 08:30 PM
"No te metas con Zohan" No Spanish Audio or Subs Spanish crispicazzo 13 05-07-2009 12:30 AM
How can the 25GB King Kong HD Port be considered "reference material"? Blu-ray Movies - North America blu-ballz 44 03-12-2009 05:18 AM
"Milk" and "Slumdog Millionaire" Win Big at WGA Awards Movies J_UNTITLED 5 02-09-2009 05:21 PM
Onkyo listening modes and PCM "direct" Audio Theory and Discussion chasarms 8 03-20-2008 02:59 PM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:46 PM.