|
|
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals
|
Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals » |
Top deals |
New deals
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() $74.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $124.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $35.99 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.97 10 hrs ago
| ![]() $39.95 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $28.99 8 hrs ago
| ![]() $22.95 2 hrs ago
| ![]() $36.69 6 hrs ago
| ![]() $99.99 | ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $33.49 1 day ago
| ![]() $24.99 |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
|
![]()
I have seen some confusion lately where the use of the term “full screen” was being used in connotation with the 16:9 ratio instead of 4:3 ratio. This means that now some people consider 16:9 to be wide screen and some consider it to be full screen, which leads to much confusion when discussing aspect ratios. I propose that we in the blu-ray community be the ones to solve this problem by renaming one of the aspect ratios.
The way ratios are currently named: 4:3 - Full Screen 16:9 - Full Screen or Wide Screen 2.35:1 - Wide Screen I propose the following two examples 4:3 - Full Screen 16:9 - Wide Screen 2.35:1 - Uber-Wide Screen or 4:3 - Boxy Screen 16:9 - Full Screen 2.35:1 - Wide Screen I can’t wait to hear some of the ideas that the community here will have. Let us push forward and the confusion. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Blu-ray Guru
|
![]()
Lets leave it at:
4:3 is full screen 16:9 is wide screen --- 16:9 has different aspect ratios for example; 2.41:1 2.40:1 2.35:1 1.85:1 1.66:1 These are all wide screen formats... Now my TV has a native HD option called Just Scan when applied I get even more horizontal picture. I leave my LCD set on Just Scan so I can maximize the full picture.... It does make the widescreen more narrow vertically.... But I get more picture.... |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Expert Member
|
![]()
I think people need to stop being ignorant
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
2.35/2.4 is usually referred to as scope.
Quote:
Edit: NM. Looks like Just Scan is another name for 1:1 pixel mapping. Last edited by BStecke; 05-17-2008 at 07:58 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Blu-ray Count
Jul 2007
Montreal, Canada
|
![]()
I thoink Bob sounds good
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Power Member
|
![]()
How about these terms:
4:3 - Academy Standard 16:9 Widescreen >2:1 Anamorphic (I know that blu-ray doesn't really support "anamorphic" video, but I think people understand the idea) I don't like the term "fullscreen" and think it should be replaced by "butchered". |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Banned
May 2007
Brussels, Belgium
|
![]()
I propose that they start selling 2.40:1 TV sets instead.
It's the only way to have the exact same screen ratios as on the theaters they could call it "TruWideScreen" just as they call high quality sound TrueHD |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Blu-ray Knight
|
![]()
Then you'd have bars on the sides of 1.85 movies, which would bring about the same argument.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 | |
Active Member
|
![]() Quote:
1:33 = 4:3 = Standard 1.66:1 to 1.85:1 = 16:9 = Flat 2.35:1 to 2.40:1 = 20:9 = Cinema-scope Hope this helps. |
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
thread | Forum | Thread Starter | Replies | Last Post |
dvd widescreen vs Blu-ray widescreen? | Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology | oppopioneer | 46 | 01-08-2011 12:16 AM |
Widescreen Setup On Widescreen LCD TV | Home Theater General Discussion | Mr. Joshua | 6 | 12-17-2007 06:12 PM |
widescreen TV 16:9 and widescreen movie | Home Theater General Discussion | projectryan | 3 | 07-28-2007 02:13 AM |
Is a Samsung refurb the way to go now for the short term? | Blu-ray Players and Recorders | phloyd | 5 | 09-27-2006 09:19 PM |
|
|