Halloween (2018) - Page 240 - Blu-ray Forum

dkelly26666 · 10-25-2018, 09:25 PM

This is the first time I'm visiting this thread and the first time I'm chiming in. From the time it was announced, all the way through the production, through post, through marketing, all the way up to release, I have never said a word. I saw it finally on Monday, and really, really truly went in with an open mind and even a bit of anticipation.

I have to say, though, even after giving myself a few days to think it over, I must admit that I wasn't terribly impressed with it.

I certainly was never bored, it was entertaining enough, and it wasn't the worst or anything. But it definitely has enough issues that I can't say I like it.

Just briefly, the opening pre-credits sequence (I thought) was poorly done right off the bat, then the opening credits were clearly just an homage to the original. Then, for about an hour or so, I liked it OK. Like it wasn't a great film or anything, but it was alright for what it is. Then, the final third or so hits and it becomes absolutely terrible for the most part. Which nearly ruins it overall. Moments that clearly were supposed to be 'A-Ha!' or 'Yes!!!' moments, had me absolutely cringing. I could go into greater detail, but would rather not discuss heavy spoilers for a just released film.

Anyway, definitely not my favorite. I saw it with my wife and adult son, and they didn't care for it, either.

Overall, beyond the hype and all, it's really just ultimately benign and forgettable.

UniSol GR77 · 10-25-2018, 10:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mar3o

Psycho II says hello. It was released in 1983, 22 years after the first film, and brought back Anthony Perkins reprising his role of Norman Bates.

Oh LOL I totally forgot that.

UniSol GR77 · 10-25-2018, 10:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Shingster

It didn't though, did it? Myers had been resumed in film up until three years before H20. By the same definition Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation resumed the lead character 20yrs later about four years before H20.

Unless you wanna talk about being a direct sequel 20yrs or more after the fact, in which case Psycho II did that in 1983.

I was talking about Laurie.

Shingster · 10-25-2018, 10:20 PM

Laurie is in Halloween II, so technically only 17yrs later and like I said before: Psycho II beat it to the punch anyway.

jayman3 · 10-25-2018, 11:01 PM

I find it hilarious how everyone was super excited when it was announced Blumhouse was making a Halloween film.

Now that it's been released, and news of a sequel everyone is all upset about it.

Member-351780 · 10-25-2018, 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jayman3

I find it hilarious how everyone was super excited when it was announced Blumhouse was making a Halloween film.

Now that it's been released, and news of a sequel everyone is all upset about it.

i've been excited ever since they announced the news and i'm down for a sequel

AreaUnderTheCurve · 10-25-2018, 11:53 PM

This is a horrendous and unfettered piece of tripe with no redeeming value. Those involved should now be seen as talentless hacks who have no love for the iconic villain and his arch-nemesis. If you're going to disregard decades of canon, make sure your movie is better than those it is supposed to replace. As much flack as 4, 5, Curse of Michael Myers, H20, and Resurrection get, this one takes the cake.

There is no atmosphere. There are no scares. The acting is shite. The script is shite. The directing is shite. The cinematography is shite. Themes set up are squandered. The music is malignant and uninspired.

if you like this, reflect on your taste in horror movies.

1/5

dallywhitty · 10-25-2018, 11:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AreaUnderTheCurve

if you like this, reflect on your taste in horror movies.

Says the guy who implied the film's inferior to Resurrection...

Chaotic · 10-25-2018, 11:56 PM

Can people not like a movie without insulting people who do? Jesus

AreaUnderTheCurve · 10-25-2018, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dallywhitty

Says the guy who implied the film's inferior to Resurrection...

Correct. Because Resurrection knew what it was tonally and delivered on that. This one didn't.

dallywhitty · 10-25-2018, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AreaUnderTheCurve

Correct. Because Resurrection knew what it was tonally and delivered on that. This one didn't.

Resurrection is the cinematic equivalent of watching someone perform an abortion.

thecooldud · 10-25-2018, 11:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AreaUnderTheCurve

. If you're going to disregard decades of canon, make sure your movie is better than those it is supposed to replace.

The crucial issue. The replacement is a giant, steaming turd.

Hoke Moseley · 10-25-2018, 11:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AreaUnderTheCurve

This is a horrendous and unfettered piece of tripe with no redeeming value. Those involved should now be seen as talentless hacks who have no love for the iconic villain and his arch-nemesis. If you're going to disregard decades of canon, make sure your movie is better than those it is supposed to replace. As much flack as 4, 5, Curse of Michael Myers, H20, and Resurrection get, this one takes the cake.

There is no atmosphere. There are no scares. The acting is shite. The script is shite. The directing is shite. The cinematography is shite. Themes set up are squandered. The music is malignant and uninspired.

if you like this, reflect on your taste in horror movies.

1/5

this post is shite

Jennifer Lawrence Fan · 10-26-2018, 12:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chaotic

Can people not like a movie without insulting people who do? Jesus

They can't. That's internet logic.

Steedeel · 10-26-2018, 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hoke Moseley

this post is shite

^This

The Debts · 10-26-2018, 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AreaUnderTheCurve

This is a horrendous and unfettered piece of tripe with no redeeming value. Those involved should now be seen as talentless hacks who have no love for the iconic villain and his arch-nemesis. If you're going to disregard decades of canon, make sure your movie is better than those it is supposed to replace. As much flack as 4, 5, Curse of Michael Myers, H20, and Resurrection get, this one takes the cake.

There is no atmosphere. There are no scares. The acting is shite. The script is shite. The directing is shite. The cinematography is shite. Themes set up are squandered. The music is malignant and uninspired.

if you like this, reflect on your taste in horror movies.

1/5

Jeez, who pissed in your coffee this morning?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jennifer Lawrence Fan

They can't. That's internet logic.

Ah, the GIFT.

Steedeel · 10-26-2018, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dallywhitty

Says the guy who implied the film's inferior to Resurrection...

Apparently, us life long horror fans don’t know anything about horror!

I kinda get the impression this film was going to get the same reaction off certain people regardless of its qualities. I mean, calling the soundtrack shit and also JLC who was fantastic from start to finish.

Steedeel · 10-26-2018, 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thecooldud

The crucial issue. The replacement is a giant, steaming turd.

Box office and happy fans (in general) say hello! 100 million and counting, go Mikey, go Mikey, go Mikey, go Mikey Mikey Mikey.!

AreaUnderTheCurve · 10-26-2018, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Debts

Jeez, who pissed in your coffee this morning?

Well, when I spend $30+ to see a movie, I want to ensure the money was worth it. It wasn't. So you can bet I am bitter about it. In fact, I saw the movie last Friday and I'm still miffed about its existence. I should have known that the banality known as Danny McBride would have seen fit to inject his brand of comedy into the movie, shaking up the tone. He Marveled it. Eff that guy.

InuYashaCrusade · 10-26-2018, 12:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AreaUnderTheCurve

Well, when I spend $30+ to see a movie, I want to ensure the money was worth it. It wasn't. So you can bet I am bitter about it. In fact, I saw the movie last Friday and I'm still miffed about its existence. I should have known that the banality known as Danny McBride would have seen fit to inject his brand of comedy into the movie, shaking up the tone. He Marveled it. Eff that guy.

You're doing it all wrong if you spent $30 dollars on a movie ticket.

View Poll Results: Rate the movie (only after you have seen it)
One Star	24	4.32%
Two Stars	59	10.63%
Three Stars	147	26.49%
Four Stars	244	43.96%
Five Stars	81	14.59%
Voters: 555. You may not vote on this poll

10-25-2018, 09:25 PM	#4781
dkelly26666 Blu-ray Samurai Member since:Jul 2012	This is the first time I'm visiting this thread and the first time I'm chiming in. From the time it was announced, all the way through the production, through post, through marketing, all the way up to release, I have never said a word. I saw it finally on Monday, and really, really truly went in with an open mind and even a bit of anticipation. I have to say, though, even after giving myself a few days to think it over, I must admit that I wasn't terribly impressed with it. I certainly was never bored, it was entertaining enough, and it wasn't the worst or anything. But it definitely has enough issues that I can't say I like it. Just briefly, the opening pre-credits sequence (I thought) was poorly done right off the bat, then the opening credits were clearly just an homage to the original. Then, for about an hour or so, I liked it OK. Like it wasn't a great film or anything, but it was alright for what it is. Then, the final third or so hits and it becomes absolutely terrible for the most part. Which nearly ruins it overall. Moments that clearly were supposed to be 'A-Ha!' or 'Yes!!!' moments, had me absolutely cringing. I could go into greater detail, but would rather not discuss heavy spoilers for a just released film. Anyway, definitely not my favorite. I saw it with my wife and adult son, and they didn't care for it, either. Overall, beyond the hype and all, it's really just ultimately benign and forgettable.

10-25-2018, 10:20 PM	#4784
Shingster Blu-ray Ninja Top contributor Member since:Aug 2009	Laurie is in Halloween II, so technically only 17yrs later and like I said before: Psycho II beat it to the punch anyway.

10-25-2018, 11:01 PM	#4785
jayman3 Banned Top contributor Member since:Jul 2013 Location:Orlando, FL	I find it hilarious how everyone was super excited when it was announced Blumhouse was making a Halloween film. Now that it's been released, and news of a sequel everyone is all upset about it.

10-25-2018, 11:53 PM	#4787
AreaUnderTheCurve Blu-ray Guru Member since:Jul 2008 4K collection:40 Blu-ray collection:91 Blu-ray reviews:1 Trading Score:25	This is a horrendous and unfettered piece of tripe with no redeeming value. Those involved should now be seen as talentless hacks who have no love for the iconic villain and his arch-nemesis. If you're going to disregard decades of canon, make sure your movie is better than those it is supposed to replace. As much flack as 4, 5, Curse of Michael Myers, H20, and Resurrection get, this one takes the cake. There is no atmosphere. There are no scares. The acting is shite. The script is shite. The directing is shite. The cinematography is shite. Themes set up are squandered. The music is malignant and uninspired. if you like this, reflect on your taste in horror movies. 1/5

10-25-2018, 11:56 PM	#4789
Chaotic Blu-ray Grand Duke Member since:Mar 2009 Location:Denver, CO	Can people not like a movie without insulting people who do? Jesus

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals