As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Airport: The Complete Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$67.11
8 hrs ago
Halloween III: Season of the Witch 4K (Blu-ray)
$14.37
11 hrs ago
The Mask 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.00
22 hrs ago
Outland 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.32
19 hrs ago
Hard Boiled 4K (Blu-ray)
$49.99
 
In the Mouth of Madness 4K (Blu-ray)
$36.69
 
Casino 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.99
 
The Sound of Music 4K (Blu-ray)
$37.99
 
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$27.54
8 hrs ago
Back to the Future 4K (Blu-ray)
$29.96
 
Spawn 4K (Blu-ray)
$31.99
 
Peanuts: Ultimate TV Specials Collection (Blu-ray)
$72.99
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Entertainment > General Chat
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-04-2007, 09:18 PM   #21
KidOmega123 KidOmega123 is offline
Active Member
 
KidOmega123's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Kansas City, Missouri
Default

The only real argument I keep hearing from people who have gone neutral is that they're "movie lovers" that have to have their favorite movies NOW.

Becaue they live in the NOW and succumb to the thralls of instant gratification. They had to have Transformers NOW, They had to have Batman Begins NOW. You know what? I saw Batman Begins three times while it was in the theatres. I saw it again several times on DVD. And several times again on cable television. I'm pretty sure I can wait awhile until it finally comes to Blu Ray. It's not like I'm gonna curl up and die if I dont get my way NOW.

And you know what? when it DOES come to Blu Ray (and mark my words, it will), it'll be an even better release than it's HD DVD counterpart. Patience is a virtue. It reaps awesome rewards.

And here's something else to think about......you know all those lovely catalogue titles that we all want so badly?

Jurassic Park
Aliens
Star Wars
Indiana Jones
Lord of the Rings
etc, etc, etc.

They're not coming anytime soon. You wanna know why? Because those filmakers are waiting until there's a clear indication of which format will be around for the long haul. So you may THINK that having both formats is nothing but beneficial to you. But you are wrong because:

A) You're buying into inferior technology

B) You're your robbing yourself (and everybody else, for that matter) of the things we really want ( *chough* Star Wars *cough*).

So enjoy your Transformers with compressed audio. I think I'll wait for the real thing.....KTHANKBYE
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 09:21 PM   #22
Ispoke Ispoke is offline
Senior Member
 
Oct 2007
Cambridge
416
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KidOmega123 View Post
The only real argument I keep hearing from people who have gone neutral is that they're "movie lovers" that have to have their favorite movies NOW.

Becaue they live in the NOW and succumb to the thralls of instant gratification. They had to have Transformers NOW, They had to have Batman Begins NOW. You know what? I saw Batman Begins three times while it was in the theatres. I saw it again several times on DVD. And several times again on cable television. I'm pretty sure I can wait awhile until it finally comes to Blu Ray. It's not like I'm gonna curl up and die if I dont get my way NOW.

And you know what? when it DOES come to Blu Ray (and mark my words, it will), it'll be an even better release than it's HD DVD counterpart. Patience is a virtue. It reaps awesome rewards.

And here's something else to think about......you know all those lovely catalogue titles that we all want so badly?

Jurassic Park
Aliens
Star Wars
Indiana Jones
Lord of the Rings
etc, etc, etc.

They're not coming anytime soon. You wanna know why? Because those filmakers are waiting until there's a clear indication of which format will be around for the long haul. So you may THINK that having both formats is nothing but beneficial to you. But you are wrong because:

A) You're buying into inferior technology

B) You're your robbing yourself (and everybody else, for that matter) of the things we really want ( *chough* Star Wars *cough*).

So enjoy your Transformers with compressed audio. I think I'll wait for the real thing.....KTHANKBYE
Repeated for truth. Agree 100%
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 09:26 PM   #23
KidOmega123 KidOmega123 is offline
Active Member
 
KidOmega123's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Kansas City, Missouri
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterXeus View Post
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll



Doesn't sound like a troll to me.

OP - it was a tempting offer, but Combo Player is the only way I would have HD-DVD Player. The price of these combo players are so high, I'll just stick with Blu-ray. I see 2008 as the down fall of one of the HD Formats; I'm guessing it will be HD-DVD.
He may not have been an "internet troll" by your definition.

BUT....I do get the since that the influx of people (mostly new members) coming on this BLU-RAY website and posting about how these $99 dollar HD DVD players are the best bargains ever and everyone should "go neutral", are simply HD DVD supporters trying to stir up some sort of response.

And sure you could argue freedom of speech. These are just opinions.

However, it seems like trollish behavior to me.....and I question the authenticity of what's being said greatly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 09:29 PM   #24
MasterXeus MasterXeus is offline
Power Member
 
Mar 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blu-Light View Post
These "trolls" or DUD supporters or what ever you want to call them are trying to stir up trouble and/or support for their terrible format of choice.
I don't know, reading the rest of ScottSoBlu post, It doesn't really sound like a troll or stirring up support for HD-DVD. Sounds more like someone who thought $98 was a good deal for a HD-DVD player and was wondering if anyone else went dual too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 09:38 PM   #25
MasterXeus MasterXeus is offline
Power Member
 
Mar 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KidOmega123 View Post
He may not have been an "internet troll" by your definition.

BUT....I do get the since that the influx of people (mostly new members) coming on this BLU-RAY website and posting about how these $99 dollar HD DVD players are the best bargains ever and everyone should "go neutral", are simply HD DVD supporters trying to stir up some sort of response.

And sure you could argue freedom of speech. These are just opinions.

However, it seems like trollish behavior to me.....and I question the authenticity of what's being said greatly.
It's not my definition, it's from wikipedia.

Although I understand what you're saying, I just don't think (So far) this one is a troll.

$99 HD-DVD player may not sound like a good deal to you or me because we beleive HD-DVD is a dying format.

If a Blu-ray Player was on sale for $100 would you think that it was the best bargain ever? IF you answer yes, then why can't HD-DVD supporters say the same thing about their format? (They just don't know it's dying yet, or they refuse to see the light)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 09:44 PM   #26
monkyman monkyman is offline
Special Member
 
monkyman's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
Default

Well ScottSoBlu, I guess you weren't
that blu after all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 09:50 PM   #27
jnm422 jnm422 is offline
Active Member
 
jnm422's Avatar
 
Jul 2007
Montgomery Village, MD
57
Default

The only benefit I could possibly see is that if I bought one, and NEVER bought any movies, that's one less player for someone that would buy a movie.

In other words, take one for the team.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 09:53 PM   #28
KidOmega123 KidOmega123 is offline
Active Member
 
KidOmega123's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Kansas City, Missouri
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MasterXeus View Post
It's not my definition, it's from wikipedia.

Although I understand what you're saying, I just don't think (So far) this one is a troll.

$99 HD-DVD player may not sound like a good deal to you or me because we beleive HD-DVD is a dying format.

If a Blu-ray Player was on sale for $100 would you think that it was the best bargain ever? IF you answer yes, then why can't HD-DVD supporters say the same thing about their format? (They just don't know it's dying yet, or they refuse to see the light)
Well, perhaps I was hasty in labling Scottsoblu a troll. He was, infact, just stating his opinions. It was a knee jerk reaction to all of the obvious HD DVD supporters who come on here and spread fud. If he wants to support HD DVD, more power to him. However, I stand by my sentiments 110%
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 09:58 PM   #29
KidOmega123 KidOmega123 is offline
Active Member
 
KidOmega123's Avatar
 
Sep 2007
Kansas City, Missouri
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jnm422 View Post
The only benefit I could possibly see is that if I bought one, and NEVER bought any movies, that's one less player for someone that would buy a movie.

In other words, take one for the team.
I'm not exactly sure what you meant by this, but right on......I think....LOL
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 10:02 PM   #30
JToddler JToddler is offline
Active Member
 
JToddler's Avatar
 
Oct 2006
1
Default

Blu-ray all the way!!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2007, 10:03 PM   #31
foots foots is offline
Expert Member
 
May 2007
98
17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KidOmega123 View Post
The only real argument I keep hearing from people who have gone neutral is that they're "movie lovers" that have to have their favorite movies NOW.

Becaue they live in the NOW and succumb to the thralls of instant gratification. They had to have Transformers NOW, They had to have Batman Begins NOW. You know what? I saw Batman Begins three times while it was in the theatres. I saw it again several times on DVD. And several times again on cable television. I'm pretty sure I can wait awhile until it finally comes to Blu Ray. It's not like I'm gonna curl up and die if I dont get my way NOW.

And you know what? when it DOES come to Blu Ray (and mark my words, it will), it'll be an even better release than it's HD DVD counterpart. Patience is a virtue. It reaps awesome rewards.

And here's something else to think about......you know all those lovely catalogue titles that we all want so badly?

Jurassic Park
Aliens
Star Wars
Indiana Jones
Lord of the Rings
etc, etc, etc.

They're not coming anytime soon. You wanna know why? Because those filmakers are waiting until there's a clear indication of which format will be around for the long haul. So you may THINK that having both formats is nothing but beneficial to you. But you are wrong because:

A) You're buying into inferior technology

B) You're your robbing yourself (and everybody else, for that matter) of the things we really want ( *chough* Star Wars *cough*).

So enjoy your Transformers with compressed audio. I think I'll wait for the real thing.....KTHANKBYE
At least there are a few people out there who get it. Consumers hold all the power but give it all away by having ZERO SELF CONTROL. Therefore they fall prey to perceived value in a second player that should not be necessary at all.

I don't care how happy you are with being neutral the ideal isn't to have two formats. If people accept two formats there is nothing to prevent each studio from trying to have its own proprietary format the next time around. Sounds crazy huh? There will be people who buy into it though so they can be called a movie lover and an enthusiast.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2007, 12:57 AM   #32
BTBuck1 BTBuck1 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
BTBuck1's Avatar
 
Jun 2006
Oceanside, CA.
507
1
Send a message via ICQ to BTBuck1 Send a message via AIM to BTBuck1 Send a message via MSN to BTBuck1 Send a message via Yahoo to BTBuck1
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KidOmega123 View Post
Well, perhaps I was hasty in labling Scottsoblu a troll. He was, infact, just stating his opinions. It was a knee jerk reaction to all of the obvious HD DVD supporters who come on here and spread fud. If he wants to support HD DVD, more power to him. However, I stand by my sentiments 110%
My personal opinion is this:

I respect those who stand by Blu exclusive. I think those who stay HDDVD exclusive though given the lack of studio support there are either: naive, agenda driven and or just outright format fanboys and not movie lovers.

As for those that already have Blu and Buy HDDVD at these ridiculously low prices, I can't blame em (myself included ).

In the end, the A2 makes a great bedroom DVD player, keeps wear off your BD player for that purpose...you get 5-9 free Flicks, you have the ability to buy the stray exclusive release on HDDUD and or you can now pick up those titles used (hopefully) or just rent them.

I think many BD supporters should be glad BD supporters are buying these and not folks new to all this.

As for people throwing around the term "Neutral" just because you own players by both formats doesn't make you "Neutral" I am very Pro BD and reccomend it over HDDVD to EVERYONE! I Buy Blu everytime over HDDVD when given a choice in content, argue for it, etc.

But dag nabbit I love High def and Movies first.

Last edited by BTBuck1; 11-05-2007 at 01:01 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2007, 11:31 PM   #33
Teazle Teazle is offline
Power Member
 
Teazle's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Canada
1
Default Enough damage already

Reading all this about people going / being tempted to go "neutral" ... As far as I can see HD-DVD has done enough damage already just by reducing the standards of certain encodes across the boards. I wouldn't want to encourage them further by buying a $99 or even a $49 player.

Yesterday I watched Superman: The Movie -- not one of the better VC-1 encodes. Much worse the audio. I'd been so psyched to hear that classic John Williams score cranked for the first time in years. But the swooshing opening titles roll and ... oh no, what an insipid, washed-out mp3-grade rendition of what should have been an absolutely grand soundtrack.

Occasionally on a BD you get a decent-sounding lossy track (the DTS on We Were Soldiers comes to mind as something pretty kick-ass) but this 640kbps Dolby affair totally belies the original score. I would go so far as to say the music is nearly ruined by lossy compression. If there's one film that screams out simply for a good lossless stereo track this is it.

Apart from Warner I directly fault the existence of HD-DVD for this and other egregious compromises on quality. The limitations of that format are (as in the case of Superman) holding back too many Blu-ray releases. As for people who excuse their support of HD-DVD by saying they "just love the movies" or "just love high def" -- I don't know what they're on about. In fact they seem to prefer movies in "medium-high def".
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 01:53 AM   #34
radagast radagast is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
radagast's Avatar
 
May 2007
Indianapolis
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScottSoBlu View Post
Please don't get me wrong - I still prefer Blu-Ray.

But for $99, I felt it was worth having an HD player just for the odd HD film. I know it probably won't last a month, as it can't be as well built as my Samsung BD player. It's just to play the odd film that I've been hankering after.

I can't believe I'm the only one that has picked one up, though. Has anyone else done the same?
Not now.
Not ever.
Never.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 02:08 AM   #35
What'sHD What'sHD is offline
Senior Member
 
Feb 2007
Default

A little restraint now would hopefully go a long way to bringing about the end for hd-dvd.

If the BD early adopters start buying hd-dvd players cos they are cheap, well... I understand the attraction but I Really hope it does not lead to consequences in the format war (we know Warner is watching the Q4 sales).

If, for some reason related to lots of cheap player sales, they go HD-dvd exclusive in Jan instead of BD exclusive, it would be mighty sad and would punish exactly those who believe in BD the most.


My perspective is that dual format is untenable and hd-dvd winning is just horrendous. BD lovers who want to buy hd-dvd players on the presumption that BD will win anyways (due to supporters who stay BD-only) are adding weight to a minor but real risk of hd-dvd surviving for good.

2c
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 02:13 AM   #36
BlueRayFanBoy BlueRayFanBoy is offline
Banned
 
Nov 2007
Default Lets get this war over all ready!!!

Me, I am sick of this format war.
I wanna just watch movies. In the begining I was completely one sided Blu all the way, but there are titles that I want on HD-DVD as well. I almost bought one of the $98 A2's at Wallyworld the other day. My tv is 1080p, so I was going to just let the tv do the conversion to 1080p.
Anyway, I would love to see these movie studios waive this exclusive crap and go neutral for both sides and just let Sony and Toshiba battle it out.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 02:32 AM   #37
John Rider John Rider is offline
Banned
 
Nov 2007
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueRayFanBoy View Post
Me, I am sick of this format war.
I wanna just watch movies. In the begining I was completely one sided Blu all the way, but there are titles that I want on HD-DVD as well. I almost bought one of the $98 A2's at Wallyworld the other day. My tv is 1080p, so I was going to just let the tv do the conversion to 1080p.
Anyway, I would love to see these movie studios waive this exclusive crap and go neutral for both sides and just let Sony and Toshiba battle it out.

Agree 100%
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 04:53 AM   #38
tqlla tqlla is offline
Active Member
 
Sep 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KidOmega123 View Post
The only real argument I keep hearing from people who have gone neutral is that they're "movie lovers" that have to have their favorite movies NOW.
The only reason I am neutral is because I cant resist good deals. I could have easily passed on the $99 deal.. since that didnt seem like a great deal at all. However, the Mistake at best buy where they gave 3 box sets away with the Xbox add on+KONG+Media remote+ 5 Free movies... was too much to resist. Literally, for less than the cost of the SDDVDs alone, I got HDDVDs and a player.

I ended up with

Heroes HDDVD
Matrix Ultimate HDDVD
Smallville S6(i am going to see if I can exhange thise for BD)
HDDVD addon +KONG +Remote +5 free movies
-----
$180
-$125 for KONG, HDDVD addon, remote, 5 free movies(craigslist)
+$100 for HD-A2 with 5 free movies MIR
= $155 for Matrix Ultimate, Heroes, Smallville, 5 free movies and a standalone.

Really, its worth it just for the movies. Pass on Transformers. I wont buy any other HDDVDs unless Iron Man is awesome. They literally threw it at me, I couldnt resist. I am ashamed . The $99 HDDVD deal, I could ahve passed on... but price mistakes are hard for me to pass up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 04:58 AM   #39
tqlla tqlla is offline
Active Member
 
Sep 2007
Default

I also tried to right a bad review of the HD-A2 at wal mart. (because it didnt work out of the box, network set up was clumsy, the lack of messages when updating the firmware, and the long amount of time it took to update, 45 minutes)

The review never showed up. In fact there hasnt been a new review on the A2 since Oct 22? You would think a lot of people would have written reviews by now
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2007, 05:34 AM   #40
AquaticGoat AquaticGoat is offline
Member
 
Jul 2007
Alaska
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KidOmega123 View Post
Troll, troll, troll......what's with all these new members making posts about their decisions to go out and buy a HD DVD player claiming "neutrality".

This isn't about "brand loyalty" folks. None of us are getting paid for the purchases we make. HOWEVER. By supporting both brands you are single handedly prolonging this war. The market can only support one format, and that format will not be chosen as long as you continue to spend recklessly.

Instead you make glutenous decisions claiming you HAVE to have every single movie you want. If you would practice a little patience then a movie like "Batman Begins" will be release on Blu Ray once Warner sees the continued dominance of the brand.

I you LOVE the releases on HD DVD so much...then go support that brand exclusivley and leave the Blu Rays to us. Just know that those discs you covet so greatly will turn out to be nothing more than expensive drink coasters.
This is silly. if you want a movie that is on another format, buy it and don't feel bad about it. The war will end soon (and we all know who will win) and in the mean time, those of us who arent blindly loyal for no apperant reason will enjoy movies that those others cannot.

I love MOVIES! i don't care what kind of disc its on, as long as it looks good on my TV.
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Entertainment > General Chat

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
"It Came From Beneath The Sea" or "Earth vs. The Flying Saucers" on Blu-ray? Blu-ray Movies - North America Alaskankaijudude 13 08-02-2012 09:22 PM
Is "Howl's Moving Castle" aka "El Increible Castillo Vagabundo" a legit Blu-ray? Spanish OrlandoEastwood 3 10-29-2009 01:52 PM
Run your Region "A" & "B" Discs on a standalone Blu-ray Player Blu-ray Players and Recorders Blu-Style 16 02-07-2008 05:14 PM
UK gets "Kill Bill" 1&2, "Pulp Fiction", "Beowulf", "Jesse James", and more in March? Blu-ray Movies - North America JBlacklow 21 12-07-2007 11:05 AM
Just added "Bruce Almighty" and "Air Force One" to my Blu-ray collection Blu-ray Movies - North America cueman98 13 09-08-2007 02:40 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:28 PM.