As an Amazon associate we earn from qualifying purchases. Thanks for your support!                               
×

Best Blu-ray Movie Deals


Best Blu-ray Movie Deals, See All the Deals »
Top deals | New deals  
 All countries United States United Kingdom Canada Germany France Spain Italy Australia Netherlands Japan Mexico
Superman I-IV 5-Film Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$74.99
22 hrs ago
The Howling 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
7 hrs ago
The Bone Collector 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
15 hrs ago
Back to the Future: The Ultimate Trilogy 4K (Blu-ray)
$44.99
 
Back to the Future Part III 4K (Blu-ray)
$24.96
1 day ago
Death Wish 3 4K (Blu-ray)
$33.49
17 hrs ago
It's a Wonderful Life 4K (Blu-ray)
$11.99
3 hrs ago
Spotlight 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.99
13 hrs ago
Death Line 4K (Blu-ray)
$34.99
7 hrs ago
Jurassic World: 7-Movie Collection 4K (Blu-ray)
$99.99
1 day ago
The Toxic Avenger 4K (Blu-ray)
$35.33
 
Vikings: The Complete Series (Blu-ray)
$54.49
 
What's your next favorite movie?
Join our movie community to find out


Image from: Life of Pi (2012)

Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-28-2008, 01:11 PM   #1
mrbakeman mrbakeman is offline
Member
 
Sep 2007
Dacula Ga. (Hometown San Diego)
29
575
1702
950
Default Why so many new Releases without TrueHD or DTS-HD MA audio?

I was curious why with the new Dolby True HD and DTS-HD MA so many new releases are only coming out with just Dolby Digital 5.1? Speed Racer, Journey to Center of the Earth, Get Smart, all with only Dolby Digital 5.1 instead of Dolby TrueHD or DTS-HD-MA, i thought the whole point of Bluray was to provide true high definition audio and video?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 01:12 PM   #2
SDon1969 SDon1969 is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
SDon1969's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
Massachusetts
32
745
1
1
Default

I knew about Get Smart and Speed Racer, but Journey too?! That stinks. Freakin' Warner...
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 02:16 PM   #3
bases1616 bases1616 is offline
Senior Member
 
Jan 2008
3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbakeman View Post
I was curious why with the new Dolby True HD and DTS-HD MA so many new releases are only coming out with just Dolby Digital 5.1? Speed Racer, Journey to Center of the Earth, Get Smart, all with only Dolby Digital 5.1 instead of Dolby TrueHD or DTS-HD-MA, i thought the whole point of Bluray was to provide true high definition audio and video?
You need to be more specific. Why so many new releases from Warner without lossless audio. Warner has not come out and said anything about this at all. There is already a thread talking about this please got there. Mods please move these posts or delete them and close thread.


https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...ghlight=warner

Last edited by bases1616; 10-28-2008 at 02:19 PM.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 02:21 PM   #4
MOONPHASE MOONPHASE is offline
Blu-ray Duke
 
MOONPHASE's Avatar
 
Jun 2007
California
8
520
820
18
29
Default

most movies on blu-ray only use a 25gb disc except for the hottest movies but on those 25 gb discs they max it out with extras, way to many language options, etc. like Speed Racer Blu-ray is only on a 25gb disc. so the better question is why isn't warner trying to use more 50gb discs and just put the extras on a 25gb disc?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 02:26 PM   #5
mrbakeman mrbakeman is offline
Member
 
Sep 2007
Dacula Ga. (Hometown San Diego)
29
575
1702
950
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bases1616 View Post
You need to be more specific. Why so many new releases from Warner without lossless audio. Warner has not come out and said anything about this at all. There is already a thread talking about this please got there. Mods please move these posts or delete them and close thread.


https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread...ghlight=warner
Be more specific! I think i was very specific. I didn't see any other posts related to this. It's not just Warner, according to the coming soon releases Journey is a New Line release.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 02:26 PM   #6
JimShaw JimShaw is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
JimShaw's Avatar
 
Jul 2008
Menifee, CA
49
1069
141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbakeman View Post
I was curious why with the new Dolby True HD and DTS-HD MA so many new releases are only coming out with just Dolby Digital 5.1? Speed Racer, Journey to Center of the Earth, Get Smart, all with only Dolby Digital 5.1 instead of Dolby TrueHD or DTS-HD-MA, i thought the whole point of Bluray was to provide true high definition audio and video?
I agree. I personally love movies, and don't care that much about PQ. My button is AQ. If a Blu only has Digital 5.1, I don't waste the $$$ on it. I purchase the DVD version to enjoy the movie and save money to buy the Blus that step up.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 02:29 PM   #7
stockstar1138 stockstar1138 is offline
Banned
 
stockstar1138's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mrbakeman View Post
Be more specific! I think i was very specific. I didn't see any other posts related to this. It's not just Warner, according to the coming soon releases Journey is a New Line release.
New Line = Warner now. They fully control the company as of earlier this year.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 02:36 PM   #8
mrbakeman mrbakeman is offline
Member
 
Sep 2007
Dacula Ga. (Hometown San Diego)
29
575
1702
950
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stockstar1138 View Post
New Line = Warner now. They fully control the company as of earlier this year.
Did not know that, that explains it i guess. Thanks!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 02:44 PM   #9
DeadLikeSteve DeadLikeSteve is offline
Junior Member
 
Sep 2008
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MOONPHASE View Post
most movies on blu-ray only use a 25gb disc except for the hottest movies but on those 25 gb discs they max it out with extras, way to many language options, etc. like Speed Racer Blu-ray is only on a 25gb disc. so the better question is why isn't warner trying to use more 50gb discs and just put the extras on a 25gb disc?
Money. They are cutting corners where they can and people still buy their movies. There are a few people on this forum that will not buy from anyone if the disc is not lossless. They are in the minority and Warner knows it. Until the movie buying population completely stops purchasing non-lossless audio movies these kinds of activities will continue.

Calling or writing the movie houses wont change these business practices only sales numbers will. vote with your wallet.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 03:15 PM   #10
stockstar1138 stockstar1138 is offline
Banned
 
stockstar1138's Avatar
 
Apr 2007
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadLikeSteve View Post
Money. They are cutting corners where they can and people still buy their movies. There are a few people on this forum that will not buy from anyone if the disc is not lossless. They are in the minority and Warner knows it. Until the movie buying population completely stops purchasing non-lossless audio movies these kinds of activities will continue.

Calling or writing the movie houses wont change these business practices only sales numbers will. vote with your wallet.
There is actually a shortage of 50GB discs out there.

See earlier this year, there was still much uncertainty over blu-rays success.

Paramount and Universal did not support the format at all and blu-ray marketshare was less than half of what it is now.

Then, WB goes BD exclusive and within months Parmaount and Universal competely switch sides and start churning out every new release and catalogs on BD too.

On top of all that Kojima, Media Molecule and Insomniac go, hey Sony we can't fit our games on BD25s, we need BD50s and between all 3 of them, nearly 10 million BD50s get sucked up.

Due to this though, Universal has been limited I belive to BD25s and their audio has been loseless, which proves to show that WB NEEDS TO GET WITH THE PROGRAM!!!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 03:26 PM   #11
J.Cornelius J.Cornelius is offline
Active Member
 
J.Cornelius's Avatar
 
Jun 2008
Default

I wonder if it has anything to do with box office success? Speed Racer was a total bust, estimated cost was like 150M and took in about 44M. Maybe the executives did a cost benefit analysis of adding a lossless audio track to the Blu Ray release. Pure speculation of course.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 03:34 PM   #12
davcole davcole is offline
Power Member
 
Aug 2007
Cincinnati, Oh
138
407
25
146
9
Default

Seriously, is there any one other than Warner/Newline who is releasing DD only on it's theatrical releases?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 03:36 PM   #13
bajor27 bajor27 is offline
Blu-ray Guru
 
bajor27's Avatar
 
Nov 2007
BC, Canada
1031
2
5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Cornelius View Post
I wonder if it has anything to do with box office success? Speed Racer was a total bust, estimated cost was like 150M and took in about 44M. Maybe the executives did a cost benefit analysis of adding a lossless audio track to the Blu Ray release. Pure speculation of course.
The money argument might work for Speed Racer, but it doesn't work for Journey or Get Smart.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 03:47 PM   #14
mrbakeman mrbakeman is offline
Member
 
Sep 2007
Dacula Ga. (Hometown San Diego)
29
575
1702
950
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bajor27 View Post
The money argument might work for Speed Racer, but it doesn't work for Journey or Get Smart.
I don't know if i want to go as far as boycotting everything Warner because let's face it, it was Warner who ended the format war with their decision to go exclusive blu. My question would be does it really cost them that much more to put the lossless track instead of the DD track?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 03:49 PM   #15
JimShaw JimShaw is offline
Blu-ray Samurai
 
JimShaw's Avatar
 
Jul 2008
Menifee, CA
49
1069
141
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadLikeSteve View Post
Money. They are cutting corners where they can and people still buy their movies. There are a few people on this forum that will not buy from anyone if the disc is not lossless. They are in the minority and Warner knows it. Until the movie buying population completely stops purchasing non-lossless audio movies these kinds of activities will continue.

Calling or writing the movie houses wont change these business practices only sales numbers will. vote with your wallet.

Exactly
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 03:59 PM   #16
Lucy Diamond Lucy Diamond is offline
Blu-ray Champion
 
Lucy Diamond's Avatar
 
Apr 2008
The Tomb of Annihilation
-
-
-
-
2
3
Default

They re-released Superman returns.

This fact, to me, throws all arguments out the window and poses all new questions.

They must be aware of the issue and they must want their movies to be the best they can possibly be. There are production and duplication timelines and shortages to consider at this (still) early stage of the game, so maybe they just want to get their stuff out there.

We'll see what happens, but I don't buy the "it's good enough - ship it!!" theories at all.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 04:30 PM   #17
Tempest Tempest is offline
Senior Member
 
Apr 2008
223
7
Default

We should create a black list of all titles not containing lossless audio so people can reference it quickly for titles NOT TO BUY.

Also make a list for horrible transfers.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 05:01 PM   #18
cydetrakd cydetrakd is offline
Active Member
 
cydetrakd's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
Pensacola, FL
359
1
9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stockstar1138 View Post
There is actually a shortage of 50GB discs out there.

See earlier this year, there was still much uncertainty over blu-rays success.

Paramount and Universal did not support the format at all and blu-ray marketshare was less than half of what it is now.

Then, WB goes BD exclusive and within months Parmaount and Universal competely switch sides and start churning out every new release and catalogs on BD too.

On top of all that Kojima, Media Molecule and Insomniac go, hey Sony we can't fit our games on BD25s, we need BD50s and between all 3 of them, nearly 10 million BD50s get sucked up.

Due to this though, Universal has been limited I belive to BD25s and their audio has been loseless, which proves to show that WB NEEDS TO GET WITH THE PROGRAM!!!
this was news to me but it doesn't come as a surprise sony and first party developers wants to make the best quality product they can for the ps3 and movie studios want to do the same with the exception of Warner even though we owe them for winning the war for us. Hopefully bluray disc manufacturers will step up their game and make more 50gb discs asap which will mean all movies will be best quality if warner starts making all their releases full hd instead of just hd pic
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 05:02 PM   #19
cydetrakd cydetrakd is offline
Active Member
 
cydetrakd's Avatar
 
Feb 2008
Pensacola, FL
359
1
9
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tempest View Post
We should create a black list of all titles not containing lossless audio so people can reference it quickly for titles NOT TO BUY.

Also make a list for horrible transfers.
it should even be a sticky
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2008, 05:23 PM   #20
Alan Gordon Alan Gordon is offline
Blu-ray Ninja
 
Alan Gordon's Avatar
 
Aug 2007
Dawson, GA
867
2455
437
1874
2065
4091
1896
44
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stockstar1138 View Post
Due to this though, Universal has been limited I belive to BD25s and their audio has been loseless, which proves to show that WB NEEDS TO GET WITH THE PROGRAM!!!
For the record, Universal has released several movies on BD50s.

Quote:
Originally Posted by J.Cornelius View Post
I wonder if it has anything to do with box office success? Speed Racer was a total bust, estimated cost was like 150M and took in about 44M. Maybe the executives did a cost benefit analysis of adding a lossless audio track to the Blu Ray release. Pure speculation of course.
SR's Dolby Digital soundtrack at 640k is a separate soundtrack from the DVD release... meaning that if WB decided it wasn't worth it, it was simply because they didn't want to spend the money on a BD50 (which is probably what you meant), but some titles from WB have been found to have room to spare on the BD.... regardless of whether or not it's a BD50 or BD25. Don't remember about SR though...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucy Diamond View Post
They re-released Superman returns.

This fact, to me, throws all arguments out the window and poses all new questions.

They must be aware of the issue and they must want their movies to be the best they can possibly be. There are production and duplication timelines and shortages to consider at this (still) early stage of the game, so maybe they just want to get their stuff out there.

We'll see what happens, but I don't buy the "it's good enough - ship it!!" theories at all.
Pioneer (or Panasonic... one of the "P" companies, though I'm pretty sure it's Pioneer) PAID for WB to add a "lossless" track to SR. WB probably just sold out of their original run of SR discs, so it really didn't cost them anything to do a new version... unlike Sony.

~Alan
  Reply With Quote
Reply
Go Back   Blu-ray Forum > Movies > Blu-ray Movies - North America

Similar Threads
thread Forum Thread Starter Replies Last Post
Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HD Master Audio decoding Home Theater General Discussion Preeminent 7 07-05-2009 11:06 PM
DTS-HD Master Audio vs Dolby TrueHD Audio Theory and Discussion alphadec 26 05-18-2009 12:51 AM
Dolby TrueHD and DTS-HDMA Audio Levels Home Theater General Discussion MrRoy 41 09-03-2008 01:39 PM
Dolby TrueHD vs. DTS-HD Master Audio Blu-ray Technology and Future Technology Zinn 11 10-10-2007 04:29 PM
BD-P1200 and lossless audio truehd/dts hd Blu-ray Players and Recorders vanbit 4 07-01-2007 08:25 AM



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:55 PM.